Catholic Exchange

USCCB’s Review of The Simpsons Movie

If there aren't many out-and-out surprises for fans of the durable TV series (18 seasons and counting) on which it is based, there are chuckles to be had in abundance.

For The Simpsons Movie (Fox) is a glossier version of its small-screen precursor with perhaps a handful of words and expressions and one visual gag that wouldn't pass muster with the TV censors.

The plot — which is more substantial than many episodes — has doltish Homer Simpson (voice of Dan Castellaneta) running afoul of Russ Cargill (voice of Albert — billed as "A." — Brooks), the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, not to mention (in one of the film's funniest conceits) President Arnold Schwarzenegger (Harry Shearer).

Homer has unwittingly dumped his new pet pig's droppings in Springfield's now pollution-free lake. Before this faux pas, sensible environmentalist daughter Lisa (voice of Yeardley Smith) had managed to rally the town into cleaning the murky water. Lisa, by the way, has a new admirer in Colin (voice of Tress MacNeille), an Irish lad, son of a rock star ("not Bono," he tells her pointedly), who shares her environmental consciousness.

The lake becomes grossly polluted, leading Cargill to quarantine the town under a giant impenetrable dome, an action which does not sit at all well with the trapped townspeople who rise, moblike, against Homer.

The family — including long-suffering Marge (voice of Julie Kavner), mischief-making Bart (voice of Nancy Cartwright), and baby Maggie — is forced to flee to Alaska through a handy sinkhole in their backyard that sucks them outside the dome's perimeters.

When they get to Alaska, the family learns of Cargill's plot to blow up Springfield. Marge and the kids decide to go back to do what they can to save the town, leaving selfish Homer behind.

Working from a script penned by 11 people, David Silverman directs a well-paced satire, with many topical gags: "Grand Theft Walrus"; Tom Hanks playing himself; Fox network crawls at the bottom of the screen; Hillary Clinton in the White House; and many more.

There's relatively mild irreverence, mostly from the boorish mouth of Homer. Churchgoing do-gooder neighbor Ned Flanders (Shearer), who takes the lonely Bart under his wing, is not overtly ridiculed. At one point, dotty Grampa (also Castellaneta) has a "religious experience" in church (as Marge later describes it) and actually prophesies the fate that awaits their town.

You may have heard of the scene where Homer dares Bart to skateboard nude through the town. There's a fleeting, fairly witty, glimpse of the lad's (rudimentarily drawn) privates which registers as only slightly naughty.

In Alaska, Homer and Marge have an implied (only) romantic interlude in a snowbound cabin — accompanied most amusingly by some Disney-like birds and animals — a respite from the domestic discord. But, paradoxically, for all the foolery and family dysfunction, there's an underlying pro-family message, and the satiric jibes are generally not malicious. Homer is eventually goaded into having an epiphany, namely, that "other people are as important as he is."

The elements below — by their very inclusion — seem to call for an A-III classification, but parents who have no problem with their kids watching the TV series will probably find this acceptable for their youngsters, though most of the humor, in any case, will be best appreciated by adults.

The film contains fleeting frontal male nudity, an instance of profanity, irreverent worldview, some innuendo, a couple of vulgar gestures, crude expressions, brief sight gags ranging from a same-sex kiss to bigamy to underage drinking, and light cartoon violence. The USCCB Office for Film & Broadcasting classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    what a joke.  i guess people including our bishops justify this filth because it is a cartoon.. look it up on http://www.kidsinmind.com  and you will see once again all of the filth.  our bishops have failed us again..

     

    and i can't believe they said that "parents who have no problem with their kids watching the TV series will probably find this acceptable for their youngsters, though most of the humor, in any case, will be best appreciated by adults."

     

    what the bishops should be saying is no parents should let their children or themselves watch this filth. they should not watch the series on t.v. or in the movie.. those who go to watch it knowing how trashy it is to begin with, should go to confession.

    once again, let's stop offending Jesus and stop making excuses for ourselves and why some of us have such a crude, and immoral sense of humor.. 

     

     

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    We are going to stop running the USCCB's movie reviews.  We have put a number of links to family- and Catholic-oriented movie review pages in our Community section under Movie Reviews.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thank you for doing that, CE!

    I have no doubt there is a connection between the USCCB's dismissive acceptance and even approval of offensive entertainment and the Barna research cited on CE which indicates Catholics are a singularly poor group when it comes to understanding and living their faith. They are both symptoms of the same disease.

    Lord, send us your healing!

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks, Mary…i was just thinking of emailing you that thought.  You read all our minds!  🙂

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thank you for taking a stand CE.  This is a disgrace.  In the wake of the pedophilia crisis, how can the leaders at the USCCB allow for such a comment to be written and then defend it as “OK”?   “There's a fleeting, fairly witty, glimpse of the lad's (rudimentarily drawn) privates which registers as only slightly naughty.” “but parents who have no problem with their kids watching the TV series will probably find this acceptable for their youngsters, though most of the humor, in any case, will be best appreciated by adults.”  Did we not learn anything over the past 4-6 years?  This person should be fired and the bishops should be put to task.  I will be contacting our Archbishop first thing Monday morning to get their movie review pulled.  At least he is still one of a few with common sense. The bishops should only get about 10% of the blame.  This is only one website and only one movie review.  They are not the primary educators of our children (Thank God).  We are.  Further, any “parent” that would allow their child to watch this needs to reconsider what the word “parent” means.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    FINALLY!  I have written CE twice and been told that the USCCBs movie ratings would be removed – the first time was well over a year ago.  Please tell me this will really happen!!  Thank you for listening – the only reason I even look at the USCCB reviews is to see if they actually give bad movies a bad review – unless Steve Gerendaus (sp?) does the review the reviews are typically very bad.  The only fall out from the USCCBs review of that gay/western that came out last year was their pulling the name of the person who wrote the review (They gave an "L" rating to that movie when it should have had an "O" – they later changed the rating due to complaints).  Maybe CE can have someone do the reviews using a combination of the Catholic/Christian reviews already out there – ones that are solidly committed to building up our families, not mocking them!  Almost anything is better than having what should be a very reliable resource become something you use when you want to show how badly a thing can be done.  Thank you, CE, for listening!  God Bless, KMc

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    We are hosting a Champions event this fall using your DVD (w/ permission) at our parish – a Father/Son night w/ a number of local, fired up, and happy to be priests priests!  I will ask our pastor if we can take up a collection at this FREE event to send to CE – we MUST support the few but faithful resources we have!!  I don't know where'd I'd look for news without CE – many times I use your links to purchase items for our Respect Life bins and I always try to use the Catholic Mall for any purchases – you all are great!  I pray my venting did not come across badly.  God Bless, K.Mc

     

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Not in the least.  And thank you for your support!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Update.  We are going to continue to run the USCCB reviews — I'm overruled on that — but they are going to be more judiciously screened.

    However, we have put a list of family-friendly reveiwers under Movie Reviews in our community section.  I urge all parents to check those links before taking your children to the movies. Here is the link: Movie Reviews.

    We will also add this link to the bottom of the page whenever we run the USCCB Reveiws so that parents can conveniently check with other sources.

    Blessings to you all in protecting the innocence and purity of your familes.

    Mary Kochan, Senior Editor, Catholic Exchange.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Well, hmm. Rats.

    Thanks for arguing the point, Mary.

    I hope CE's continued features of USCCB movie reviews will not be the source on continued outrage over our bishops' organization apparently winking and nudging at us on our way to Gommorah.

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but are we really going to kick up a fuss over one of the greatest shows of all time receiving a rating that it definitely deserves?  "The Simpsons" has traditionall been one of the most clever and wittiest shows on tv (well, at least the first 11 years), and the backbone of it has always been the husband-wife relationship of Homer and Marge.  They love each other and sacrifice for each other.

     Do some jokes become a bit liberal and crude?  Sure.  But are they outweighed by the overall brilliance of the world that Groening has created?  Definitely.

     So to those who may be offended by this type of humour, it's ok to not let your children watch it until they are older and can appreciate humour.  But when they do get older, show them "Homer at the Bat" and "Last Exit to Springfield."  Let them appreciate quality humour in it's finest.  Then show them Arrested Development.  But until then, remember that it's not only parents and children that read this site.

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    has anyone tried to approach the USCCB to ask why it is thier reivews often are not trustworthy as far as the moral integrity of what they reccomend for people to watch?

     

    Most catholics parents I know say ' if the bishops page says it's A-III' it must be REALLY BAD, because they consitently underate the moral offisivenss of a show.

     

    Who would we right about that? Who is in charge of that?

    For that matter who does the reivews and why is there never a name on them?

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ultra,

    Saying something is the wittiest show on TV in the last eleven years is like saying something is the best smelling fish in the landfill.

    If we know something is crude and offensive, why waste what little time we have on this earth embracing its crudeness for the relative "brilliance" of its junior high school humor?

    Has our seemingly endless search for amusement eclipsed our very reason for being?

    There are worthy things to watch on television and on film.

    Life is short. Eternity is forever.

    PTR!

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I don't mean to sound condescending or negative, but have you ever watched the show?  It's very difficult to describe the show as junior high school humour, and I think even detractors of the show who actually watch it would agree with me.

    And your argument falls apart when you say it's like the smelliest fish in the landfill, implying that all of television stinks, and yet you claim there are worthy things to watch.

    So apologies to those who are offended by good tv.

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have seen the show, maybe 10 or 12 times (granted, small sample compared to the 11+ seasons).  And I agree with both Ultra and with Protect.  (Imagine that…they're both right!)

    UltraMagnus, you are right.  It is brilliant satire.  I have not seen better satire on television.  And it is certainly not for children (although, you must admit, a large portion of the young population watch it anyway).

    Protect, makes the point that life is short, and that there are more worthy things to watch.

    Ultimately, I have had to make some serious decisions about television usage – including whether I ought to watch programs (even if they are purely morally neutral) because time is not my own.  It belongs to God, and if I'm not using it to bring myself closer to Him, then I'm not using it well and I'm breaking the 7th commandment (stealing God's time).  Even when it comes to watching brilliant satire.

    So, although I agree the writing is genius…ultimately it wasn't doing anything for me except whiling away half an hour of my life.

    But this from a mom that lets her kids watch "only" an hour of TV a day in the summer so that they don't while away their life on the tube.

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I agree that children should not be allowed to watch the show.  However, I also don't think children should be allowed to watch movies like "Braveheart" or "Gladiator."  Does that mean that they are not worthwhile or even morally rich?  Absolutely not.  But certain shows or movies (or even books) can still have plenty of merit without being appropriate for children.

    And that's the point of all these arguments.  It's ludicrous to suggest that CE stop running reviews from the bishops or to suggest the bishops are wrong because you specifically do not approve of something.  They gave "The Simpsons Movie" an A-III, a rating that is entirely appropriate, and one that specifically tells what the movie is about.

    And last of all is this idea that you are wasting time if you watch tv.  If the tv show makes you ponder God, or God's world, or the nature of humanity, I tend to believe this is meritorious.  Shows like "Lost" and "Battlestar Galactica" have at their very core the relationships between man and man as well as man and God, or some higher deity.  They both make you think about more than just the simple conceits in life, and unfortunately there's some strange stigma on tv that doesn't allow it to be considered on the same intellectual level as the cinema or theatre.

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ultra,

    Your points are well-taken. Since I watch very little TV (I have never seen Lost or Battlestar Gallactica) I am admittedly unfamiliar with most shows. If they can bring one closer to God without causing scandal or offense – that's great! That's what art is supposed to do and what the Second Vatican Council called for!

    When I mentioned the worthy things to watch on TV, I was thinking about programs which instruct children or promote faith and morals. For example, shows like "Little House on the Prairie" if it is still broadcast, is suitable family viewing — but even then many commercials are highly inappropriate, even in the family hour.

    I'm not sure I understand why you find it ludicrous to have serious concerns about the USCCB's movie reviews. These reviews have demonstrated a pattern of failing to identify Catholic parental concerns, which serves to confuse rather than inform the failthful.

    I like the way lpioch posted about our use of God's time. She often says things better than I can.

    And are you saying it is necessary to watch something in order to determine that one does not want to watch it?

    I have seen commercials for the Simpsons and found no reason to watch. I am pretty confident it is possible, even preferrable, to go through life without the extra training in being a cynic. Of all that wrong with the world, I don't think a lack of witty satire tops the list.

    Satire, while it has some use, often misses the mark.  We see this often enough on these forums.

  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    when it comes down too it 'south park' is as good and probably a better satire then the Simpson’s. 

    However the fact that something may rise to the level of, best of breed within it's genera and medium do not excuse it's actual message and content as factors for making it worthy of intake.

     

    To further my point.  Suppose for a moment that the worlds ‘best’ satire , in this case by best I mean ‘craftiest’ , ‘funniest’, ‘most well composed’ and any other adjective you might add to the satire except moral, was written.

    The subject and point of the satire however is that the catholic church is evil and God does not exists.

    Would the work be worth reading/viewing? The answer is NO!!!

    In fact the Catholic bishops should strongly recommend against reading it and it should be forbidden from catholic curriculums BECAUSE it is the ‘craftiest’ , ‘funniest’ ect it is also the most dangerous to the soul of those who read it.

    We are given talents to use either for God or his enemy.  So too can we turn our leisure and although many things are entertaining, because all being have the same creator, you have to ask yourself,  which type of creatures you are watching.  heavenly or fallen.

     

  19. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The ancient Roman empire came to a point where the daily life of the Roman citizens was centered on amusement — bread and circus. 

    It is pointed to by historians today as one of the signs that the culture had peaked and was in decline.

    Poor Romans. They weren't as sophisticated as we are, I guess.

  20. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    yeah I know exactly what you mean:

    The romans were a highly beruchratic society that documented everything.  They were phenominal engineers and depended on thier technology to help them generate wealth.  They held there empire together with complicated communications networks and used them to spread thier philosophy, language and religion around the world.  They were a republic and believed in religious tolerance ( at least for a while).

     

    No no resemblance there at all between them an us 😉

     

Leave a Reply