Catholic Exchange

USCCB’s Review of Sydney White

"We're all dorks!" That's the reassuring message of Sydney White (Universal), a quirky campus comedy about an irrepressible tomboy who becomes the guiding spirit of a group of outcasts at her college.

As raised by her widowed plumber father (John Schneider), Sydney White (Amanda Bynes) is a young lady with a good deal of self-confidence and no airs. Yet she leaves home for college hoping to join the prestigious sorority to which her late mother once belonged.

Sydney soon gains the support of another sorority pledge, Dinky (Crystal Hunt), and of Tyler (Matt Long), a fraternity brother who's quickly smitten with her. Tyler's ex-girlfriend, the snooty sorority president, Rachel (Sara Paxton), on the other hand, is far from impressed. She eventually manages to sabotage Sydney's application for membership, and sends her into social exile.

With nowhere on campus to live, Sydney turns to the residents of "the Vortex," a ramshackle dorm populated by seven of the school's most marginalized students. These collegiate underdogs — typified by the endearing, panallergic Lenny (Jack Carpenter) and the socially inept, intellectually eccentric Terrence (Jeremy Howard) — take her in, and she rapidly becomes their housemother and champion.

Questioned about the state of their living quarters, her new friends explain to Sydney that the student council, of which Rachel is also president, is entirely controlled by, and run for the benefit of, the campus's Greek letter societies. But nothing can be done, they assure her, because no one can unseat Rachel. Even as her romance with Tyler continues, Sydney decides to find out if that's true.

The clever re-imagining of a venerable fairy tale (the title is a tip-off as to which one), director Joe Nussbaum's film is for the most part an appealingly innocent romance. It also possesses a commendable set of moral values.

These are best exemplified in a scene which comes as a surprise both to Sydney and to the audience, revealing as it does an unexpectedly generous aspect of Tyler's character. At other points in the film, Tyler also shows himself to be vulnerable, sympathetic and tolerant.

These qualities, and Sydney's positive response to them, form the basis of a relationship that is not only idyllic, but mature and enduring as well. And therein lies the promise of a genuinely happy ending.

The film contains some crass language, some innuendo, implied nudity, alcohol use, brief gay references and a transvestite poet. Such elements may make the film unsuitable for teens. The USCCB Office for Film & Broadcasting classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Bishps panel, what adults would go see this?

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Most of the time I read the bishops' recommendations I wonder what religion they are shepherding. The Catholic faith teaches to avoid near occasions of sin, custody of the eyes and we hear at Mass the scriptures telling Christians to flee fornication. I've never heard the advice is only for the 18 and younger Catholics. And if this isn't a review by actual bishops, why do they let it out under the title of US Conference of Catholic Bishops?

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I'm wondering about the "implied nudity." That sounds to me a lot like the old joke about "being a little-bit pregnant:" You either are or you aren't.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I haven't seen this film, but couldn't "implied nudity" be something like a person walking behind a changing screen and then various clothes are draped over the screen — or someone is spashing out in the lake and you see a pile of clothing on the bank.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Do most of ya'll loathe your shepherds so much? Why? These bishops can't get any slack, can they? They must either act as absolute saints or they must burn. Why?

    And about these movie reviews, don't you want someone telling you if a movie is good to watch or not? Aren't you getting useful information? Or would you prefer to have a bishop just standing there saying, "Don't go see it." As ADULTS in the Faith, you should have a conscience that is developed enough to act upon teachings rather than just respond to commands. You aren't actually children! They are our TEACHERS. You can either follow or get out of the way. Don't stand at the back of the crowd criticizing everything.

    Additionally, bishops are TEACHING to a congregation that is filled with more than you "saints." They are TEACHING to the rest of us sinners. We sinners would appreciate it more if you didn't try to drown out our teachers with your constant grumbling.

    Thank you.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    twheeler,

    So you're a sinner too?  Welcome!

    And get to Confession!

    (smile)

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Protect the Rock,

    Duh!

    Thank you for your great insight.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    twheeler: don't know if you'll see this, and I did get your 'point'.  And, you're right, of course: we do need to cut our bishops some slack.  They have more responsibilities than most of us know.  I think what you're hearing is a lot–no, I mean, a LOT!–of frustration from the laity.  So many of the bishops are so busy trying to please everybody and keep any-and-all Catholics in church, that they end up not "standing" for anything.  The movie review is a case in point.  Which is why, a couple of articles ago, I suggested prayer and fasting for them.  (And, I might add, for the Pope as he considers new bishops: Lord, send us HOLY leaders!)

Leave a Reply