Catholic Exchange

USCCB’s Review of Shrek the Third

Not that it will matter to most how critics — or even the august Office for Film & Broadcasting — weigh in, but we're happy to report that Shrek the Third (DreamWorks) lives up to the high standards of the first two films, and therefore can be warmly recommended for family viewing, albeit with some minor cautions.

Near the start of this new installment, everyone's favorite green ogre, Shrek (voiced by Mike Myers) finds himself scarily on the precipice of assuming the throne, as his frog father-in-law (John Cleese) is about to, uh, croak.

Just before he does, the king blurts out the name of another potential heir who might assume the burdens of statehood: one Arthur Pendragon.

Dreading the restrictions of royal life, Shrek is determined to find this substitute ruler at all costs, and sails off posthaste with his trusty buddies — Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) — to find young Artie (Justin Timberlake), not the knight he first espies (Lancelot), but a bullied loser at a high school. (Today's teenage jargon — "like" and "totally" peppering every utterance — is hilariously on target.)

While Shrek is away, however, the evil Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) has talked a host of fairy-tale villains and ne'er-do-wells — Captain Hook (Ian McShane) and Snow White's Evil Queen (Susanne Blakeslee), among them — to rise up against the heroic characters.

So, astride witches' broomsticks and accompanied by fearsome Wizard of Oz-like anthropomorphic trees, they fly into Far Far Away, wreak havoc on the town, and capture Shrek's wife, Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz), and the other princess divas, Cinderella (Amy Sedaris), Snow White (Amy Poehler) and Rapunzel (Maya Rudolph).

Shrek hears of this dismaying news, and with the help of retired wizard Merlin (Eric Idle) gets magically, if clumsily, transported back home so they can rescue Fiona and liberate the kingdom. (In the process, Puss in Boots and Donkey end up in each other's bodies, making for more amusing silliness, and Murphy and Banderas are in top form.)

Writer and co-director (with Raman Hui) Chris Miller's latest installment has a somewhat darker edge (for example, the king's death and funeral and the destruction of the town), though there's no stinting on laughs. (And there are plenty of witty asides and smart cultural references — like the opening jibes about dinner theaters — to keep adults smiling as much as the kids.) So, too, the animation is better than ever, and visually the film offers a rich palette.

The careful emphasis in Miller's script on good values such as believing in yourself, sacrificing for others, eschewing violence and trusting in mankind's innate goodness override the occasional crude and mildly suggestive gags, which necessitate the A-II classification, but which many parents may choose to overlook in a story decked out with such a positive message and so obviously kid-friendly on the whole.

The film contains implied ogre nudity, some mildly off-color humor and innuendo, and the death of the king. The USCCB Office for Film & Broadcasting classification is A-II — adults and adolescents. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is PG — parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    i have difficulty understanding how the us conference of bishops office for film and broadcasting, can rate things the way they do.

    also in this movie, a woman lifts her skirt to show a man her bare thigh so that she can distract him. 

    i read that there is also a scene where they change the sign outside of a restaurant to say "hooters" and men go charging in, cheering..

    there is also a scene where a ogre stands naked.

     any catholic that defends this by saying, well, these aren't serious things and we can just overlook them to see the other good and funny things in the movie is not being a good catholic.

    does the restaurant "hooters" not offend Our Lord?  so why can we let it be promoted in a movie where, it is not looked upon in a bad way, but instead cheered..  is this the message we should be giving to our daughter's and to our son's. 

    no, we should be teaching them not to support movies that have things in them that are "morally offensive" to God and to us.

    we as catholics need to protect our purity and that of our children by not allowing them to see such movies.

    we should also write to the bishops and let them know how we disapprove of these ratings.  they  have a right as sheperd's tending their flock, to tell catholics what movies they may and may not see..

    some of their reviews of other movies, are terrible and apalling.

    they give some movies that support horrific things such as contraception and nudity only a Adults Only rating or an L for Limited audiences..

    they should be putting an N for nobody can see these movies without being in mortal sin..

    let us pray for the bishop's that they may change their position on how they rate movies, and that they may not worry about being too strict, and what liberal catholics are going to complain to them.

    but rather that they may worry about our eternal souls and what is appropiate to see and not to see when it comes to our eternal souls.

     

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have given up on looking to the usccb's movie ratings.

    For absolute and direct information about what is contained in a movie, I go to http://www.ScreenIt.com (if you can tolerate scrolling past a few ads).  Just ignore their "subscribe" stuff and go to the bottom and click "No Thanks" and you can still access the site and all its info.

    It will be a complete spoiler, but you know exactly what is in the movie and make informed decisions about its content.

    This is a purely secular site, but they do a fantastic job.  I heard there was a Christian one similar, but this one has done it for me for years.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    eileen breen

    Maybe I'm getting paranoid but no mention was made of the unnamed princess who seemed remarkably "manlike", was she a he or a she?  With a deep voice and towering over the other princesses, what was that all about? 
  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have only seen the trailer, but my youngest five children (<13) will not see this movie. The three older ones (>13), if they opt to see it, will have to pay for it themselves, report back on what they thought of it, and endure a parental discussion.

    Screenit is a very good resource for parents to review films for their children to view or not.  They enumerate and describe everything from smoking, drug use, alcohol, sexual innuendo, nudity, guns, and disrespectful and imitative behavior. It even highlights issues to talk about.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Yes, it makes me scratch my head too, but the USCCB's movie recommendations are totally unreliable.  In addition to the site already mentioned, "decentfilms.com" is a good site to check for movie reviews.  It is done by a Catholic, Steven Greydanus.

Leave a Reply