Catholic Exchange

Undocumented in the Driver’s Seat

My dear brothers and sisters in Christ,

Several articles ago I invented my own rules of the road, taking off on guidelines from the Holy See on rules for the road in a Christian context. Recently, an issue has confronted the State of New York regarding Governor Spitzer's attempt to issue driver's licenses to undocumented aliens.

Perhaps the first rule of the road is that no one should drive without a driver's license. In order to obtain a driver's license one must pass the driver's test, which is a good way to ensure that whoever drives knows the rules of the road and has some incentive to follow them since the issuance of the license depends upon it.

Unfortunately, there was a reaction to the Governor's proposal which was not unexpected. The New York State Catholic Conference issued a careful statement which explained the predicament in which we find ourselves in our country with undocumented aliens who are in the work force and who need to get to work, while at the same time giving keen consideration to concerns for the protection of our country against alien terrorists.

Only by backing comprehensive immigration reform will we address the situation that faces our nation, namely the problem of having 12 million persons in our country without documents. Having a secure nation is a good rule to which we must adhere, but how to accomplish it is in dispute.

Again unfortunately, one of our newspapers had a headline stating, "New York State Catholic Conference Blesses [Governor Spitzer's] License Law." The conference's statement in no way attempts to bless the law, nor is it our place to curse any law. The place of the Church in the public forum is to apply moral teaching, moral laws and the Church's social teaching to concrete situations. The Church's judgments are based on careful consideration. Of course, some judgments follow from unbreakable moral laws, such as if one were to cooperate in evil by allowing laws favoring abortion to remain the law of the land. This case of the driver's licenses certainly is not an issue of moral law, but rather is derived from an understanding of the social teaching of the Church.

As I have repeated many times in the past, the problem of undocumented aliens is a labor market problem. These aliens would not be here if there was not work for them in the labor market with employers willing to hire them. Certainly it is not the sole fault of employers that they need employees and that they find a way to obtain them.

When I did my doctoral studies for my degree in social policy, my thesis topic was, "Profiling Undocumented Aliens in the New York Metropolitan Area." The research took place in 1984-85, and actually interviews were done in Brooklyn as well as in other dioceses all over the metropolitan area, with clients who had come to our immigration services seeking assistance. There were over 800 interviews and an amazing profile was developed of undocumented workers.

The results of that research demonstrated that the undocumented are well integrated in the workplace of the New York metropolitan area. They work side-by-side with permanent resident aliens and US citizens. They are undistinguishable in the workplace from others. At that time, most had Social Security numbers that were legal and real, since a Social Security card was easy to obtain. Their employers were paying their payroll taxes and the aliens were paying their income taxes.

New residence policies have the unfortunate result of trying to drive the aliens from our country. We have driven them further into hiding by ignoring the laws which are there to protect them. One such instance is the issuance of driver's licenses. Again, the driver's license is only a symptom of a greater problem of not recognizing the social calamity we have in our midst. We have allowed persons to enter and have integrated them into the labor market, but now through sporadic enforcement of immigration laws we hope that they will leave and no others will come. Unfortunately, I do not believe that this is a workable or wise policy.

The history of immigration in our country is a spotted one. We call ourselves frequently a nation of immigrants and yet our immigration laws have shown clear racist tendencies that have been highly discriminatory.

In 1924, the McCarren-Walter Act, perhaps the most racist law the United States Congress ever passed, discriminated against southern and eastern Europeans by holding them to a quota from the 1890's before they came in great numbers. This favored northern Europeans and those from Western Europe. Only in 1965 was that highly discriminatory law overturned. This was a prelude to the new immigration law that we are struggling with. Already in 1986, legalization of almost three million undocumented persons took place, since the immigration law itself is not adequate to deal with the needed labor in our country.

In 1996, another highly restrictive law was passed whose intention was to discourage people from coming without proper documents. Unfortunately, its scope has not worked. In 2002, in the wake of the attacks of 9/11, the Patriot Act was passed that had highly discriminatory provisions aimed at aliens. Its enforcement has caused unnecessary family separation.

As an advocate for immigrants and, I believe, a student of immigration history and a researcher into the facts of immigration, I am constantly frustrated by the American public's lack of understanding of this complex social issue. Truly, we need to step back and study the facts and not listen to a biased media which seems to exploit this issue in order to gain ratings or to give certain commentators a chance to show their deep-seated prejudices against aliens in our land.

Another situation that we face today is the attempt by city and state legislators to enforce immigration laws or pass laws that are clearly discriminatory. For example, several cities have passed laws against the rental of apartments or houses to undocumented aliens. In effect this makes landlords enforcers of immigration law. Those laws have been found to be unconstitutional in some states already.

There is another movement afoot. Some call it the New Sanctuary Movement whereby certain cities and even some churches will not enforce immigration laws or follow any laws with the intention of protecting undocumented aliens who live in particular cities or who come to certain churches looking for sanctuary. Again, I believe this is a misguided policy. It borders on civil disobedience. I believe it will not produce valid results or change the root problem, which is the need for comprehensive reform of immigration laws.

As the Bishop of Brooklyn, I cannot help but be concerned about the well-being of so many aliens who are documented but also about the undocumented in our midst. The latest statistics show that half the population of our Diocese is foreign-born, and similarly, almost half the Mass-going population is also foreign-born. We cannot close our eyes to the facts that we are a society that has need of new immigrants but which struggles with giving them the proper welcome.

Each time I write about immigration issues I truly "put out into the deep" because it is usually the only column for which I receive much negative mail. Put out into the deep we must if we will bring the Church's social teaching and a studied knowledge of the facts in this area to the public forum.

Look beyond the media reports. Talk to your neighbors. Try to understand the plight the undocumented face but also the problem we face as a society. Our country must protect itself, but at the same time cannot scapegoat aliens as the only cause of our security problems.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I don't know Bishop DiMarzio, but I assume that he is a competent, caring person. He is also subject to the same temptation that affects most of our bishops, speaking our on matters that are beyond his expertise.

    Does that mean that I believe that the Bishop should not speak on immigration. Not at all. I welcome the teaching of the bishops on the moral principles involved in immigration and other public policy issues. But, the public doesn't need their opinions on issues that are beyond their education and training.

    I also believe that "physician heal thyself" applies to the bishops public policy statements. As a group, the American bishops have done a poor job of managing Christ's Church. Dioceses are going bankrupt, homosexual clergy are mocking Scripture, and the faithful are not being ministered to because of a shortage of priests. Yet, with their credibility stretched to the breaking point, the bishops feel moved to lecture our society on its problems.

    Bishop DiMarzio may be a competent bishop with an above average diocese and above average dedication and holiness. But, he should be smart enough to recognize that, until the American Church gets its house in order, no one is paying attention to him or his opinions on public policy.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ditto, techwreck.

    Also, the bishop mentions the 1986 law legalizing 3 million illegal aliens.  Many would agree that was a mistake then and that it would open the floodgates to more amnesty based its precedence:  exactly what the bishop is arguing for.

    Also, this bishop along with others like John McCain and Sen Lindsay Graham use vicious name calling  such as "racist" and "prejudiced" to describe those who support the rule of law and, in my case, want the countries of origin to be held accountable for their citizens.

    Finally, the bishops regularly say, "We support the rule of law, but……".  I hear that "but" formula a lot from teenagers who are rationalizing their antisocial behavior. 

    Get your house in order, Bishop,…. but I guess its easier to pull the speck from another's eye. 

     

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Part Two:

    Would that the bishops would spend a tenth of the time fighting against contraception and for the integrity of marriage as they do pontificating about immigration (an issue with no clear cut teaching according to the CCC).

    I'm sure the 40-45 million babies aborted in this country alone since 1973 would have appreciated an all out war against abortion and those who support it.  I wonder if the Bishop knows that more African American babies are aborted in Brooklyn every year than are born alive?  Their blood cries out, Bishop!  

    If the Bishop truly wants to "set out into the deep", fighting the dual scourges of contraception and abortion would be a great place to test his sonar depth detector.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am guessing that I read a different article than "elkabrikir" and "techwrech" did.

    The good bishop was addressing the issue because it directly impacts his diocese and his flock. He stated clearly that one-half of the Catholics in his diocese are immigrant. So he is speaking to his diocese. Just because it got picked up by CatholicExchange.com does not mean that his words were meant for you.

    Context, people! Context! Imagine the Bible out of context. Ghastly!

    Are you privy to EVERYTHING that this good bishop has said or done? I, for one, am NOT. He may speak about the issues of abortion and marriage every day. (He may not. I am not saying anything one way or the other.) 

    My point is that you should NOT start mentioning about "specks" or "planks" until you can see the whole person. Beware! You may be blinded yourself. (And you could be a prophet, who am I to judge without full information.)

    I am just saying that maybe you should just take this one statement as this one statement and not as an extrapolation of this bishop's entire mind.

    I am sorry if I offended. If I did, get a thicker skin. I pray for peace among all Catholics so that others may see us as a loving family and desire to join. Amen.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The concerned bishop is simply observing, correctly, that neither policy extreme will solve the problem.  It is obvious to me that, while enforcement against illegals is essential, so also is opening the doors to legal immigrants.  I have a friend whose then-fiance applied for a visitor's visa more than a year ago.  She has since married him and must travel to Mexico to visit him, as his application still waits for a decision.  If he came illegally, he would be lauded as a victim and would be able to work under the radar and get free medical care.  Instead, he and his bride remain separated by an immigration policy that punishes the law-abiding and rewards the lawbreakers.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am not offended by what you said, any more than you would be offended by what I said. This is a forum for expressing our views.

    What this bishop wrote for his diocese is the policy of the USCCB. I've seen it articulated by many bishops exactly as he wrote it.

    Further, if he has done a whiz-bang job addressing the issues of which I wrote, I think it would have made the news and been a prototype for other dioceses. Brooklyn, is a at the apex of the abortion holocaust. Over 20,000 babies are killed in that borough yearly! He breathes baby dust daily. Maybe when he wakes up and smells his morning coffee he'll recognize the odor of their ashes rising to God.

    What I read in his article was one long "but" to his "personal" application of "flawed" immigration laws.

    However, as soon as I post this, and make lunch for the kids, I will research the NFP programs in his diocese and his ongoing work to end the scourge of abortion in his house. I'll get back to you.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have posted a link to an article that was written when the bishop was installed in Brooklyn. There is no mention in it regarding his strident support or any support for the scourge of contraception and promiscuity which is ruining this country and his diocese. There is no mention of his zeal for fighting abortion and saving tens of thousands of babies in his midst (including those of illegals). His primary focus is legalizing the illegals. He even says in the article "I think they should all be made legal". That is the focus of his work in Brooklyn as it was in Camden.

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B05E3D9133EF931A3575BC0A9659C8B63&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Subjects/I/Immigration%20and%20Refugees

    In response to christy's post, Your friend and her spouse chose their path. It is also not unique across history for family to be separated for a time for the greater good. There are plenty of sob stories out there and plenty of people lining up and paying big bucks for their green card. I agree, legal behavior should be rewarded.

    As an aside, why are 50 Chinese who stow away in a shipping crate returned to China? Why are a handful of Haitians tossing on the sea and near death thrown back on the shores of their desolate island? Why are millions of Mexicans (according to census figures) allowed and encourage to invade?

    I think the reason why this issue of illegal immigration gets my blood boiling is that I see it as part of a concerted effort to destroy the United States of America as we know it in favor of something like a North American Union.  This issue is less about poor people finding working in our land of plenty and more about corporations and the politicians who support them raping illegals and destroying the Constitution in the process. It is outside the scope of this post to discuss all the ways by which our nation is being subverted.  However, when the primary features of the Culture of Death, Contraception and Abortion, have been allowed to ravage our society unchecked in any meaningful way by the bishops, while millions are killed and families destroyed, while the multi billion dollar pornography industry pollutes family offices, and while the homosexual agenda outlaws the words "mother" and "father" in schools the bishops have been distracted by immigration and frequently discuss it.  I think Satan knows exactly how to destroy this experiment called the USA and the Constitution and Bill of Rights that supports it and a nation FREE to WORSHIP GOD.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "elkabrikir," I think that Planned Parenthood, NARAL and ACLU are working in cahoots with Satan more than illegal immigrants. If "we the people" really wanted illegals out, then they would be out. Ditto for abortion. What makes my blood boil is that my Republican President, Republican-controlled Congress, and Republican-dominated Supreme Court spoke more about illegal immigration than they did about ending abortion. Why did I vote these people into office if they are going to bay at the moon rather than solve my nation's problems? End the illegal immigration problem. End abortion! Don't sit on your duffs in the White House, the Courtroom, or the Houses of Congress and not accomplish anything! END ABORTION!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

     I don't think the illegals are working in cahoots with Satan at all.  I think they are pawns, if anything, of corporate America, who is Godless, and the politicians on both sides of the aisle who support them.  They are also victims of the corruption in their countries of origin.

    Also, I don't think that the bishops, like the one in this article, are looking at the full implication of legalizing this batch of millions of illegals while the freeflow continues.

     Hedonism, in particular sexual hedonism, is destroying our country.  Contraception and Abortion is the battlefield upon which the bishops' prayers and actions should be focused.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have to wonder if some part of the bishops support for aliens is not biased by the fact that most of them are practicing catholics.  Not that a certain amount of 'looking out for ones own' is unhealty.

     

    also, I'd like to point out that this bishop does proport to have studied this issue in great deatail so the idea that he is speaking outside his compentency seems a bit askew.

    Specifically he states:

    "As an advocate for immigrants and, I believe, a student of immigration history and a researcher into the facts of immigration, I am constantly frustrated by the American public's lack of understanding of this complex social issue."

     

    I think it should be acknowledge that he demonstrates a fair amount of intimancy with the problem regardless of weather or not one agrees with his views.

     

    As near as I can tell this article is well balanced.  It does not seem to advocate any specific policy but is focus on encourging deeper consideration of the issues them a simple emotional reaction, which is the custom of our 30 second sound bite society.

     

Leave a Reply