Catholic Exchange

The Golden Compass Brings Nietzsche to Narnia: The Philosophical Underpinnings of His Dark Materials

When parents look at the beautiful covers adorning the gift-boxed sets of Philip Pullman's fantasy series, His Dark Materials, they might be forgiven for believing that these books follow in the tradition of J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings or C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia. In fact, the publishers are counting on it. The display tables have arrived just in time for Christmas and the release of the screen adaptation of the first volume: The Golden Compass.

What Pullman's promoters desperately hope is that parents will not get beyond the colorful covers, which appear to depict nothing more than an action/fantasy series filled with talking animals, exciting battles, and a child protagonist. What they desperately fear is that parents will discover the dark and sinister philosophy that unfolds within the pages of Pullman's work — a philosophy that condones the killing of children to advance knowledge; disparages virtue and glorifies cunning; and which poses the idea that the solution to humanity's problems is the killing of God. In short, the philosophy that underlies much of Pullman's fiction is Friedrich Nietzsche's — a German philosopher whose work was influential with the Third Reich.

Nietzsche's major philosophical ideas include the Will to Power, the Superman, and the myth of the Eternal Return. While the third idea is hinted at in the last book in the series, it is the first two ideas that fill the pages of His Dark Materials. It is important for pastors and parents to understand these concepts so that they can be prepared to talk about their impact. Briefly, then, I will sketch these ideas, then show how they appear in The Golden Compass and throughout His Dark Materials, and finally demonstrate how these books — aimed at children — attempt to inculcate Nietzsche's worldview.

Nietzsche's View of the Way the World Works

The Will to Power

The main theme running throughout the writings of Nietzsche, gaining full force in his work, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, is that life is a demonstration of a will to power. Nietzsche rejected external authority, arguing that since all morality is subjective — a mere expression of the will of others — there is no reason why any one morality should be preferred. What marks humanity, Nietzsche argued, is a desire to assert one's own will, or, in other words, to do that which is right in one's own eyes.

Dana Villa, the Packey J. Dee Professor of Political Science at Notre Dame, explains that Nietzsche's belief in the lack of absolute values — a lack of an objectively "true world" — leads to the destruction of "shared appearances" (291). As a result, to the extent that there are any values in the world, they ultimately find their grounding only in the perspective of the person doing the valuing, and in no other. Nietzsche advocated absolute moral autonomy. To illustrate, Nietzsche, in The Antichrist, defines "the good" as:

 All that enhances the feeling of power, the Will to Power, and power itself in man…Not contentment, but more power; not peace at any price, but war; not virtue, but efficiency…The weak and the botched shall perish: first principle of our humanity. And they ought even to be helped to perish. (128)

Nietzsche scholar George Allen Morgan identifies four key "sins" — lust, thirst for mastery, self-seeking, and cruelty — that, under Nietzsche, are revalued as "goods:" lust is the good which draws toward the future; thirst for mastery drives the powerful to exercise their power over lower people; self-seeking is the source of discriminating taste and causes refinement; and cruelty leads to a lusty vitality (180-181). The masterful types will exert their will to power over lower types, and the extent of their mastery will be measured in their ability to do so. Morgan declares for Nietzsche that "True advance is measured by the mass of humanity sacrificed to 'the growth of a single stronger species of man'"(81). Ultimately, this planned evolution is designed to breed the superman.

The Superman

In order for Nietzsche's ultimate expression of the will to power to arise — the superman — it is first necessary to kill God. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche portrays the murder of God at the hands of The Ugliest Man, who chokes God to death on His own pity.

Theologian Norbert Schiffers explains Nietzsche's position:

With his own instinct for the good, man is strong enough to be ashamed of his belief in the God who alone is good. Even before The Will to Power Nietzsche makes his man with the instinct for the good, his Zarathustra, say that to his eyes and ears God goes against his taste. It is in the power of this instinct and with this taste that Nietzsche says in full awareness: the God of metaphysics, the God of the Moralists, the God, too, of a Christian philosophy — they are dead. (71)

The superman is the embodiment of the will to power and makes up an aristocratic class that rules over Nietzsche's other two types of people: the higher men and the herd classes (Fowler 157). According to University of Warwick philosopher Keith Ansell-Pearson, such a person, freed from any cultural or theological moral restraints, "is master of a free will, and which gives him mastery over himself, over nature, over less fortunate creatures who have not succeeded in achieving sovereignty" (278-279).

With the "repressive" moral power of the dead god removed, the superman is free to express and develop his will to power. The superman stands atop the hierarchy of humanity. To those not yet among his peers, even to those of the "higher men" he would be a being fearful to behold. "Since man must become 'better and worse,' a superman will possess the 'evil' urges to maximum intensity; his kindness would be terrible; the best of us would call him a devil" (Morgan 175). It is Nietzsche's supermen — filled with will to power — that seek the death of God in His Dark Materials.

Bringing Nietzsche to Narnia

His Dark Materials are fantasy novels aimed at the youth market. They tell the story of Lyra and Will, two twelve-year-old children who are major actors in a titanic struggle between God and humanity. The first book, The Golden Compass, seems to deliberately borrow from C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia. In both books, the action begins when a little girl hides in a wardrobe. Both books contain magic and talking animals. When we are introduced to Lyra, she is living at Oxford University — where Lewis went to school and, later, taught Medieval Literature while composing the bulk of his books. It is also the university from which Pullman received his bachelor's degree. Lucy, in The Lion The Witch, and the Wardrobe, rides on the back of Aslan, the Great Lion. Lyra, in The Golden Compass, rides on the back of Iorek, a great armored bear.

But when it comes to morality and redemption, the worlds created by Lewis and Pullman could not be farther apart. Lewis' world is infused with Christian imagery. Within The Chronicles of Narnia, a reader would encounter everything from Creation and Fall, to the death, burial and resurrection of Aslan (the Christ figure), to discipleship, and even The Second Coming and the End of the World. The central idea of Narnia is that there the children can learn to know and love Aslan, so that later, when they have grown up, they might more easily recognize Him (as Jesus) here.

In His Dark Materials, Pullman has crafted a world in which the most natural thing would be to desire the death of God. Pullman stated, in an interview with The Sydney Morning Herald, that "My books are about killing God." Like Nietzsche, Pullman needs God to be dead in order to liberate humanity from what Pullman deems a repressive, absolutist morality so that people will be free to be themselves — by which he means to follow their human nature, to be what nature intended them to be without supernatural interference or restraint.

The human embodiment of this oppression is The Church. Pullman cleverly constructs his ecclesiastical universe so that Catholicism and Protestantism can be derided together. He accomplishes this by having John Calvin, in this alternative universe, elected Pope (GC 30). Calvin moves the papacy to Geneva, and then the office is dissolved upon his death, though the institutional structures — such as the Magisterium and the General Oblation Board — are maintained.

The Church is filled with power-hungy zealots. Its leaders are greedy abusers of the poor. As an institution, it is to be feared. The archbishop is described as a "hateful old snob" (GC 84). The Church operates the General Oblation Board which lures children from the streets, and then spirits them away to a place where they become the subjects of a frightening blend of medical and theological experimentation in which their externalized souls are separated from their bodies. Pullman's world is populated by Christians who are inquisitors and witch burners. When the reader reaches the third book, The Amber Spyglass, Pullman introduces a priest, Semyon Borisovitch, who is described as fat, with dirty fingernails, a soiled cassock, and a long, unkempt beard. He is a drunk, his place reeks of tobacco. Pullman stops just shy of revealing Semyon as a pedophile when twelve-year-old Will comes knocking at his door: "The priest kept leaning forward to look closely at him, and felt his hands to see whether he was cold, and stroked his knee" (AS 98). Later, after plying the boy with vodka, the priest hugs Will "tightly" while apparently praying for him. The scene is written to appear creepy, and to build mistrust. And if there is any lingering doubt, Pullman has Mary, an attractive character, tell the children that "The Christian religion is a very powerful and convincing mistake, that's all" (AS 441). If these are God's representatives, then God must be a fraud, unworthy of our allegiance.

Will to Power and the Supermen

The Nietzschean heroes of His Dark Materials who are tasked with toppling God include Lyra and Will, and by the end of the series, even Lyra's parent, Mrs. Coulter and Lord Asriel shed what at first appears to be "bad guy" status to become the first martyrs in the battle to destroy the Kingdom of Heaven to replace it with the Republic of Heaven. Other heroes include Iorek Byrnison — an armored bear whose kingdom has been usurped, and Serafina Pekkala, the queen of a clan of witches. As Pullman draws out each character, it is clear what he finds compelling about them: their rejection of God and the absolute morality God represents, and their will to power. Here is a brief sketch:

Lyra, as her name suggests, is a notorious liar — and she benefits by it. Ma Costas, a Gyptian boat wife, tells Lyra that it is a compliment in their culture to be considered effectively deceptive (GC 112). Lyra maneuvers through the adult world, getting what she wants by manipulation, pretense, and cunning. She occasionally speaks frankly about killing her enemies, or making others do the killing for her (SK 163). She is an apple that has not fallen far from the tree.

Will does not appear until the second book in the series: The Subtle Knife. He is aptly named. Will gets what he wants by determination or force. Will kills people, and threatens to kill Lyra if she gets in his way (SK 61). To get the titular knife, Will must fight the current possessor for it. To the victor goes the spoils or, in other words, might makes right. Learning to use the knife to cut a hole between worlds is Will's epiphany. Lyra describes the scene as seeing an authority descend upon Will — but that it is Will's authority; he is creating it. In a confrontation with angels (who turn out to be weaker than humans), Will says, "If I'm stronger, you have to obey me. Besides, I have the knife. So I can command you: help me find Lyra" (AS 11).

Mrs. Coulter, Lyra's mother, does not ascend to superman status (though she is very close), but from her introduction in The Golden Compass she fits into Nietzsche's "higher man" category. She runs the General Oblation Board for the Church, uses her charm to snatch children, mercilessly experiments on them, uses sex as a weapon, brutally tortures prisoners, and treats others in the Church as inferiors. She is admired by Lyra for her style, grace, power and passion. Readers are encouraged to applaud Mrs. Coulter's defection from the Church, and are expected to overlook her many atrocities (Mrs. Coulter never repents of them) once her love for Lyra is revealed.

Lord Asriel, Lyra's father, is described as an explorer, easily angered and passionate, with "a hatred of priors and monks and nuns" (GC 123). He is a man who is not to be defied. He murders Lyra's friend, Roger, to pull energy from him as part of a successful experiment to build a bridge to another world. Despite that, his raw power excites in Lyra grudging admiration. By the final book, Lord Asriel has assembled a large army that he intends to lead into battle to defeat God — an army favorably compared to the one commanded by Lucifer when there was a war in heaven, eons past. One character notes Lord Asriel's limitless ambition, "He dares to do what other men and women don't even dare to think" (SK 47). Loved and feared, Lord Asriel is a Superman.

Iorek and Serafina represent states of nature. Each wants to be left alone to live life as nature intended. The Church has polluted bear culture; the new king of the bears wants to be baptized as a Christian, and wishes to model his kingdom after the humans. Iorek rejects this move with disgust, ultimately fighting and defeating the weaker bear king. Serafina chronicles centuries of abuse by the Church. She explains that Christianity has always suppressed nature and has been against every good feeling. She declares that if a war breaks out, the witches only need to align themselves against the Church and they will be on the right side.

These are Role Models?

All of these characters embody, to varying degrees, Nietzsche's idea of Will to Power. They reject any morality as having authority over them. They are people of command. Whether the issue is sexual license, lying, torture, or killing — they all feel justified in doing as they will to obtain their desired results. They serve themselves, and they revel in power. These are the role models that Pullman has served up to impressionable children looking for vacation reading. They don't even know it yet, but once Pullman hooks them with the sanitized version represented by the screen adaptation of The Golden Compass — a move that will likely lull many parents into complacency about the books — then he will have the freedom to use his fantasy series to pour into their hearts Nietzsche's terrible lessons.

There is, however, a potential silver lining. Christians can explain that the desire to transcend our own humanity is not, in itself, evil. Nietzsche tried to accomplish that transcendence from below — a weak creature willing itself to power. God, however, can provide it from above. God promises to everyone who comes to Him in faith not some bland sameness, as if we were nothing more than members of the herd, but real true individuality. As Bernhard Welte points out, the Lord has promised to inscribe His name on our foreheads (Rev. 22:4). Welte explains the significance of that promise for believers:

That means that God's name, that is, the superhuman and divine radiance is inscribed on the human forehead as, therefore, the radiance of man himself. It indicates the authentic superhumanity of man. It does not arise from the self-intensification of the finite will, but much more as a pure gift from above, in the setting of the City of which it is written that it descends from heaven, from God, and therefore cannot be constructed from below (57).

[Watch for the Next Article The Golden Compass: Sexualizing Children in the World of His Dark Materials]

Works Cited:

Ansell-Pearson, Keith. “Nietzsche on Autonomy and Morality: The Challenge to Political

Theory.” Political Studies 39.2 (1991): 270-286.


Fowler, Mark. “Nietzschean Perspectivism: ‘How Could Such a Philosophy Dominate?’"

Social Theory and Practice 16.2 (1990): 119-162.


Meacham, Steve. “The Shed where God Died.” Sydney Morning Herald, December 13,

2003, online:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/12/1071125644900.html?from=storyrhs.

Morgan, George Allen, Jr. What Nietzsche Means. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1975.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Antichrist. vol.16. The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche. ed. Oscar Levy. New York: Russell and Russell, 1964.


—. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. trans. Walter Kaufman. New

York: Modern Library, 1995.

Pullman, Philip. The Golden Compass. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1995.

—. The Subtle Knife. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1997.

—. The Amber Spyglass. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 2000.

Schiffers, Norbert. “Analyzing Nietzsche’s ‘God is Dead.’” trans. Robert Nowell.

Nietzsche and Christianity. eds. Claude Geffre and Jean-Pierre Jossua. New York:

The Seabury Press, 1981. 65-77.

Villa, Dana R. “Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of

Political Action” Political Theory 20.2 (1992): 274-308.

Welte, Bernhard. “The Ambiguity of Nietzsche’s Superman.” trans. John Cumming.

Nietzsche and Christianity. eds. Claude Geffre and Jean-Pierre Jossua. New York:

The Seabury Press, 1981. 53-57.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Wow. I had no idea. Let's hope and pray that Christian parents, and the rest of us, will see through the lies and that the scheme this movie represents will backfire in a huge way. I saw a preview for this movie recently, and I was shocked at the way the characters used the term "Magisterium" to represent the epitome of evil. This is perverse and vile stuff.

     

    "I praise you Father, Lord of heaven and earth, for the things you have hidden from the wise and the learned you have revealed to the merest children." -Matthew 11:25

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The USCCB reviewer (Forbes) for their Commucations Department said this is an okay movie! He aslo said the Brokeback Mountain was okay even though it taught the active homosexuality was an okay thing. If you would like to express your respectfull opinion to the USCCB here the communcations web site: commdept@usccb.org <commdept@usccb.org>

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I hope people will take the time to read through this — we usually don't put things quite this long and "philosophical" in the lead space, but I thought this was important and that our audience would appreciate it.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ok, so how come the UNITED STATES BISHOPS are SUPPORTING THIS MOVIE????  AND YES, I'm YELLING!!!  WHAT are they thinking???!!!!!

    –You have made us for yourself, O Lord; and our hearts are restless until they rest in You. — St. Augustine

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "That means that God's name, that is, the superhuman and divine radiance is inscribed on the human forehead as, therefore, the radiance of man himself. It indicates the authentic superhumanity of man. It does not arise from the self-intensification of the finite will, but much more as a pure gift from above, in the setting of the City of which it is written that it descends from heaven, from God, and therefore cannot be constructed from below (57).

                      -Silly Catholics, Yes, your religion makes you feel semi-secure.. but deep down-in your hearts- you know something isn't quite rght, there's just something missing in the ultimate scope of clarity. Having faith in God is really all you must do, just be sure not to get caught up in allowing any outside source to control how you feel. Striving towards heaven our whole lives is the basic idea of why we're here.. But on our journeys of following our hearts, we discover that heaven can be created on earth!! Yes, the feeling of peace, which dwells inside, attainable by accepting All That Is, which is Love. WE ARE LOVE. God is not some far off being, God is the Truth of light and love within us. God is the LIFE. We are living to LIVE! To BE HAPPY! Not to go around playing power games over our own siblings. That is not the right choice. We are not here to find the parts of ourselves that we don't quite understand or like, and tear them apart, of course no answers will come when we think we already have them. We have to be open. LOVE YOUR ENEMIES! I know I know how easy it might be to get carried away in the literal sense of the written word, but it is time now to reach deeper, so we may be able to see the light of God, which is all around us, here on earth!  But honestly, just LOOK at what you're saying. Come on people open your eyes a little, please?..

    WE ARE GOD'S CHILDREN!! We are made in His likeness and image, our goal is to become one with Him, and yes, there are some good guidlines set for us, but there is so much more. Just go WITHIN. Everything will make sense, even though it might be painful to face the past, but the point is to live in the PRESNT(it is a gift after all). The "radiance of man himself"  Is God's light shining through our hearts when we keep them open.  Jesus= Forgiveness, which leads to acceptance of pure love, which in the end, is the only thing worth living for, and the only thing we can take with us when we die. Love, Love, Love. Stay OPEN to the deeper messages God is showing you through EVERYTHING surrounding you. Never stop stretching towards becoming one with God(this is true heaven, becoming whole in the Light.)

    I love you all. God is inside of all of us, as One.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    LoveIsAllThereIs, I can be the silliest Catholic of all, dancing attendance on our Father, Savior and Spirit.

    suz slu –

    We don’t seem to be heard, no matter how we yell at most of our bishops.

    They are more likely to be attending a coffee-klatsch party for someone the likes of Pullman.

    I would ask any American Catholic ordinary who reads this article, the other comments and my sad commentary just above to stop by. Please, in terms of the USCCB approbation for this movie, calm my frazzled soul.

    Cardinal Francis George, a son of yours in the Chicago archdiocese, I really want to hear from you.

    And, kind Eminence, stop by often . . . 🙂

    Remember, I love you, too .

    In our delighted glory in our Infant King,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    My wife found out that this book series is in the library at St. Paul's elementary in Westerville, Ohio where our children attend school.   She tried to talk to the librarian about the anti-christian themes in the book and see if they might remove them from their shelves but she simply stated that the Bishop's office had approved it for their use.  It is unfortunate that we have to use this as a teaching opportunity solely at home and can't have it reinforced within our Catholic schools.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thank you for this article. I have printed it out so I can re-read it later and share it with others-

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it. and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men —  when we can do it — is no less a sin than to encourage them." ~ Pope St. Felix III (6th Century)

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Its not specifically from Archbishop Chaput but this article from the CNS appeared in the Denver Cathokic Register: 

    http://www.archden.org/dcr//news.php?e=445&s=1&a=9328

     In this day and age Parents need to be more discerning and not leave it up to staff members of the USCCB to decide what is appropriate for their children. We are after all called to leaven society with our faith and witness.

    Dado

    AMDG

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Dear LoveisAllThereIs

     

    God is Love. And He is so much more. He is Truth and Beauty. He is true freedom.

     

    You said: "-Silly Catholics, Yes, your religion makes you feel semi-secure.. but deep down-in your hearts- you know something isn't quite rght [sic], there's just something missing in the ultimate scope of clarity."

     

    I say to you — in all charity — that you are wrong. I do not feel "semi-secure." On the contrary, I feel completely secure, that all the Catholic Church teaches is rightly ordered, and that I see the world in complete clarity.

     

    Yes, we are all God's children, but we are creations, and we will never be the Creator. One of the beauties of the Catholic faith is that we can be partakers of the divine nature, but we will never BE God. I can "look within" all day long, but that will NEVER make me God.

     

    Nor do I strive to BE God. I am happy to merely be loved by Him. And I am so very happy to be able to receive Him in Holy Communion. What joy. What a privilege. I pray that you may experience such joy.

     

    As my friend Pristinus Sapienter says, "Remember, God loves you too."

     

     

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    LoveisAllThereIs— why is that your brain does not explode from the pressure of containing completely incompatible ideas?

    You wrote: "Having faith in God is really all you must do, just be sure not to get caught up in allowing any outside source to control how you feel."

    Well FYI — God is an outside source. God is Other. Yes, it is true that His Spirit dwells in us and we are His children, but when you reduce worship to navel gazing or the contemplation of the Wonderfulness of Me, you are in deep trouble and divorced from the Christian faith. And BTW that very same Jesus who you say "=Forgiveness" is the one who started the Catholic Church that you feel so free to disrespect.

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am not sure if this will be read by many, but I want to ask you to read the review on the USCCB site. The problem is the spinning that is going on about the subject matter. Stay focused on what needs to be said about Pullman and his dark materials. From the way it appears the movie has been sanitized and can suggest other than what Pullman has intended. I do not like being victimized by Hollywood, and I try to get the whole picture. I love the exposure all of this is getting. But the review on the USCCB is about the movie and what the reviewer saw. And he clarifies how it differs from the books. It is unforntuate the spin doctors use the positive to imply what the critic really doesnt say. But that's what the press does. The critic ought to have been a bit smarter in what he wrote so that the spin would not happen.

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Joe,

    Split those hairs if you wish, but consider a few rather obvious facts here:

    • The Golden Compass is based on the first book in a series of three. We may safely assume future movies are planned.
    • In the books, the story line grows darker and darker in each successive book.
    • The author of the books, Mr. Pullman, has freely admitted the books are about killing God.
    • The producers have admitted they have sanitized some of the book in making this first movie.  Remember, this is based on the first, least offensive book to begin with.
    • The film is being very agressively marketed and is aimed at children.
    • The USCCB reviewer is reviewing films for the Catholic bishops in the United States to help the faithful in their life in Christ — to preach, teach, and sanctify — the three things bishops do.

    The USCCB reviewer, unless he lives under a rock instead of clinging to one, is aware of these facts and of the controversy surrounding the books and this film.

    He has successfully passed through the similar controversy of giving a positive review of the film Brokeback Mountain without losing his position.

    He has deliberately chosen to give this review and to blunt criticisms of the book from the film and to assure the faithful this film is appropriate for adolesccents and above. 

    Now his name and excerpts from his movie review are featured in full page ads in diocesan newspapers across the USA. I'm sure he is praised as a courageous person in certain circles.

    Whatever happened to rejecting Satan and all his works and all his empty promises, eh?

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Protect the Rock — your response is what I wanted to send Mr. Forbes. I agree with you 200%.(BTW -MSNBC has used the excerpts in his review to indicate that the USCCB endorces the film.)  When I was trying to put the note together, I was trying to undertsand what he was thinking and where he was coming from as a critic. I think he ought not to write for the USCCB, period. I wrote to my archbishop mentioning that ( who is on the USCCB). BTW, the  USCCB does not have a good rep in hiring people. There was an instance they had another "upper management" person who was pro-choice. From what I understand is the hiring staff's background check was less than complete. Thanks for articulating what I was not able to.

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I just saw the ad – a black background with a picture of the compass,  the film title and the quote,"An exciting story. Intelligent and well crafted." – U.S.Conference of Catholic Bishops

    Our bishops need to know this is being plastered all over the world in their name connoting their authority and approval.

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    Oh, my good Lord, let us pray to You. We are lost and Your shepherds are out here – LOST – with us!

    The ‘Dark’ movie(s), such as they are, have to be presumed to be designed to sell the books. Have not Tolkein’s trilogy works (plus ‘Hobbit’ and ‘Silmarillion’) become very much more widely read since Peter Jackson’s fine films?

    I feel, so, so weary . . .

    Remember, I love you, too .

    In our delighted glory in our Infant King,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    found this on http://www.IMDB.com

    (BTW – thank you Mr. Forbes)

    The U.S. Conference of [Catholic] Bishops has split with the Catholic League, the nation's largest Catholic lay group, over The Golden Compass. The League has called for a boycott of the movie, which opens Friday, claiming that it promotes atheism. But the official review of the film by the Conference says that "the good news is that … explicit references to this church" found in the book on which the movie is based "have been completely excised." The review continues: "This is not the blatant real-world anti-Catholicism of, say, the recent Elizabeth: The Golden Age or The Da Vinci Code. Religious elements, as such are practically nil." However, William Donohue, president of the Catholic League, has insisted that the movie will encourage young people to read the book. "The idea is to sell the horrors of Catholicism and the virtues of atheism to youth," he said on Fox News Channel Wednesday.

  19. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    The USCCB via Forbes is misleading far more than the Catholic League is mistaken, if the alleged ‘misses’ are going to be weighed.

    The movies, a la the Harry Potter and Ring Trilogy films, will lead to more readers of the BOOKS. We have one scatter-brained Catholic school board already out to endorse the BOOKS. Might they not be able to cite the USCCB/Forbes pabulum?

    Do the ordinary members of the USCCB read much of what is passed off under their authority? As I did above, I would ask any American Catholic ordinary who reads this article, the other comments and my commentaries to stop by. Please, in terms of the USCCB approbation for this movie, give us a shepherd’s take, here.

    Cardinal Francis George, I am a son of yours in the Chicago archdiocese. I really want to hear from you.

    And, your Eminence, come on down and stop by often. 😉

    (Good grief! First, an image of myself in a bonnet – over in ‘Politics’ – and now one as a fat, bald, old sheep

    (BA-A-a-a-D!)

    Remember, I love you, too .

    In our delighted glory in our Infant King,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  20. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The ad for "The Golden Compass" in the entertainment section of The Kanas City Star prominently show the favorable quotes from the "US Catholic Bishops" in large print.

    Shame on us for handing the enemies of the Church a weapon with this.

  21. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thank you, Catholic Exchange, for such an article!!!

     Wow, what an article.  It shows how the modern philosophies are nothing but perfectly perverse inversions of Christian Truth.  In every aspect they are exactly wrong.  And reading their descriptions of what they think of reality, who would want to live in such a world?  It is so twisted that they even break with logic to achieve their evil, because it would show them their error. 

    Their adoration of the "subjective" is just the opposite of what God has done in His creation.  Their souls are "externalized", while in reality our interior life of the soul, hidden from the world's view by God, is the place where God's transformation of us takes place, and when perfected, puts us in power over the external world.  Life, as the Bible points out, comes from within (Jn 1, v4) through God's grace.  Pope Paul VI & JPII both pointed out the personalist expression of the truth of reality, that in heaven, we will experience the personal life of the objective Truth, having been purified of the mere subjective, which in this life is our struggle to submit to the Truth which fills God's world, and comes from Him.  It is the life of virtue which is the substance of our being, and which makes their judgements of us so ludicrous and empty.  They can't touch the reality of God's Love and design with their out-in-the-cold lack of understanding. 

      But this stuff is extrremely toxic and lethal, and can only be safely approached, like in this article, in the scholarly third person.  Part of what makes it so dangerous for infection of the young and innocent is that the books are a vehicle for putting the lethal doctrine and attitudes in the first and second person.  This makes them much more easy to absorb and access.  Pray that any brush up against this stuff is only enough of a dose to serve as an innoculation. 
      Reading this article, with its excellent summation of Nietzsche's philosophy, reminds me of how when in college, when I was supposed to read his writings, I either couldn't bring myself to read them, or for shorter excerpts, got so little out of them, that I can only think it was grace protecting me from them.  And my friends who read them all lost their Faith.  This stuff was everywhere in colleges back in the sixties and seventies, and I can't imagine it has gotten better.  It seems God was forming me the old fashioned way:  learn to know the authentic first, and the counterfeit will be obvious every time. 
    And with that, I wish God's Love to you and yours. 
  22. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Nietzsche's philosophy is far more profound and complex than the above article has indicated– just as Christianity is far richer than is sometimes acknowledged by its detractors. Nietzsche is not morally neutral, nor is his ultimately a relativist philosophy of nihilism, though he does deal with dangerous ideas, and ones that threaten religious faith. But it does no one any service to give uneducated interpretations of it that are not based on long, serious, and respectful study and meditation.

    The Pullman books too are far more charming than the caricature above would indicate. His best characters, far from being amoral, are actually strong and noble-minded, and often also very kind and gentle. They are thus are part of a far more complicated picture of the world than that which is indicated above.

    As with the bible, it is very easy to quote out of context and therefore partly to mis-represent the thoughts of authors.

  23. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    First problem is we wil have to ignore Mr. Pullman's own words that his purpose in writing the books was "to kill God" before we embark on our long, serious study.

    Once we do that, I'm sure we can find much that is profound and complex in the Pullman books and film as well as Nietsche's work.  But recall such profundity and nuance characterized the plot and characters of both Nazi and Soviet propoganda. 

    I would not recommend spending too much time and energy on long, serious, respectful study of them for use in children's literature and film!

Leave a Reply