Catholic Exchange

The Battle over the Mass

Why is such a battle over the Mass occurring now, 40 years after the Second Vatican Council? Because Benedict XVI wishes to restore what has been lost.

Pope Benedict XVI, against the opposition of many, is preparing to issue a "motu proprio," or personal decision, allowing wider celebration of the old Mass. We applaud his decision and urge him to publish it quickly. The time has come for the restoration of the perennial liturgy of the Church. It has been too long since the sublimely beautiful and holy liturgy of our ancestors, and of our own youth, was abandoned for light and transient reasons.

Cardinal Jorge Medina Estevez has stated publicly that the document's publication is imminent, so it would not be surprising if the document were issued even before this issue of Inside the Vatican appears. It would be good if it were so.

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, a "motu proprio" is "the name given to certain papal rescripts on account of the clause motu proprio ('of his own accord' or 'by his own decision') used in the document." The encyclopedia continues: "The words signify that the provisions of the rescript were decided on by the Pope personally, that is, not on the advice of the cardinals or others, but for reasons which he himself deemed sufficient… A Motu Proprio was first issued by Innocent VIII in 1484. It was always unpopular in France, where it was regarded as an infringement of Gallican liberties, for it implied that the sovereign pontiff had an immediate jurisdiction in the affairs of the French Church. The best-known recent example of a motu proprio is the instructions issued by Pius X on 22 November, 1903, for the reform of Church music."

There are those who have argued that such a papal decision will "cause confusion," will be "too abrupt." But the decision which caused our current confusion was the decision after the Second Vatican Council to change the Mass, abruptly. That decision was taken virtually overnight, without consultation with the faithful around the world. And so let the return of the old Mass be brusque, let it come quickly and decisively, as the banishment of the old Mass was quick and decisive.

 Pope Benedict has argued that the profound root of the ecclesial crisis of our time is liturgical, that the crisis of the sense of the sacred, the crisis in the sense of God's presence, which has characterized our time, is a liturgical crisis. If he acts now to restore the old liturgy, he will be coherent with everything he has been saying and writing for 50 years. A decision to delay the document, or set it entirely aside, would be out of keeping with his own expressed convictions over a lifetime of reflection.

The International Federation in support of the old Mass, Una Voce, on January 29 published an eloquent manifesto in support of the Pope. "There has been much speculation in the media in recent months about the expectation from Rome of a document that will grant greater freedom for the celebration of the traditional ([so-called] 'Tridentine') Roman rite of Mass," the document begins.

"There have been some highly critical comments from certain quarters, especially from the French and German bishops, who do not agree with the prospect of loosening the very tight restrictions imposed by most bishops around the world. It is a fact, for whatever reason, that these bishops oppose greater freedom for the celebration of the traditional Mass and have no interest in the opinions of the laity or even of many of their own priests who long to celebrate this ancient rite; a rite that has never been abolished and is still valid…

"In 1971 many leading British and international figures… presented a petition to His Holiness Pope Paul VI asking for the survival of the traditional Roman Catholic Mass on the grounds that it would be a serious loss to western culture. The then Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Heenan himself appealed to Pope Paul for the continued celebration of the traditional Mass. The full text of this appeal in 1971 was:

'If some senseless decree were to order the total or partial destruction of basilicas or cathedrals, then obviously it would be the educated — whatever their personal beliefs — who would rise up in horror to oppose such a possibility. Now the fact is that basilicas and cathedrals were built so as to celebrate a rite which, until a few months ago, constituted a living tradition. We are referring to the Roman Catholic Mass. Yet, according to the latest information in Rome, there is a plan to obliterate that Mass by the end of the current year. One of the axioms of contemporary publicity, religious as well as secular, is that modern man in general, and intellectuals in particular, have become intolerant of all forms of tradition and are anxious to suppress them and put something else in their place. But, like many other affirmations of our publicity machines, this axiom is false. Today, as in times gone by, educated people are in the vanguard where recognition of the value of tradition is concerned, and are the first to raise the alarm when it is threatened. We are not at this moment considering the religious or spiritual experience of millions of individuals. The rite in question, in its magnificent Latin text, has also inspired a host of priceless achievements in the arts — not only mystical works, but works by poets, philosophers, musicians, architects, painters and sculptors in all countries and epochs.

'Thus, it belongs to universal culture as well as to churchmen and formal Christians. In the materialistic and technocratic civilization that is increasingly threatening the life of mind and spirit in its original creative expression — the word — it seems particularly inhuman to deprive man of word-forms in one of their most grandiose manifestations. The signatories of this appeal, which is entirely ecumenical and non-political, have been drawn from every branch of modern culture in Europe and elsewhere. They wish to call to the attention of the Holy See, the appalling responsibility it would incur in the history of the human spirit were it to refuse to allow the Traditional Mass to survive, even though this survival took place side by side with other liturgical reforms.'"

The Manfesto then concludes: "We appeal to His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI in 2007 to allow the free celebration of the traditional Roman rite of Mass, the Mass of Ages, the Mass of Antiquity, on the altars of the Church."

Inside the Vatican joins its voice to this appeal

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    no one  said it was going to be easy. Pray for him. 

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The Second Vatican Council was abrupt? the change in the Mass was made for light and transient reasons?

    The Second Vatican Ecumenical Council
    Dedicated to "The Immaculate".

    Sweet is the Providence that Overrules Us." Seton

     

    "Vatican II"

    Opened Under Pope John XXIII in 1962

    Closed by Pope Paul VI in 1965

    The First Vatican Council was adjourned in 1870, following the solemn definition of papal infallibility. Only a part of its task had been accomplished, but it was destined never to meet again. Pope Pius IX died in 1878, and five popes had come and gone before the Second Vatican Council was proclaimed by Pope John XXIII.

    Pope John announced his intention of summoning the Oecumenical Council in January, 1959, within three months of his election to the Chair of Peter; he signed the Apostolic Constitution, Humane Salutis, on Christmas Day in 1961. Meanwhile, ten commissions had been formed to prepare draft decrees to be debated in the Council. At first, seventy decrees were proposed, but gradually their number was reduced to seventeen.

    Pope John wished the Council "to increase the fervour and energy of Catholics, to serve the needs of Christian people." To achieve this purpose, bishops and priests must grow in holiness; the laity must be given effective instruction in Christian faith and morals; adequate provision must be made for the education of children; Christian social activity must increase; and all Christians must have missionary hearts. In Italian, he was bale to express his desire in one word — Aggiornamento — the Church must be brought up to date, must adapt itself to meet the challenged conditions of modern times. More than words, Italians appreciate expressive gestures; so also Pope John, when asked to reveal his intentions, simply moved to a window and threw it open, to let in a draught of fresh air.

    http://www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/v1.html

    Angels fly because they take themselves lightly. G.K. Chesterton

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The article didn't say that the Second Vatican Council was abrupt, but that the changes to the Mass were. And the article did not mention this, but the changes to the Mass after the Council are not entirely consistent with the Council documents. To take just one example, Sacrosanctum Concilium (the Second Vatican Council document on the liturgy), while allowing for increased use of the vernacular, says,

    "36. 1. Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites."

    and later,

    "54. In Masses which are celebrated with the people, a suitable place may be allotted to their mother tongue. This is to apply in the first place to the readings and "the common prayer," but also, as local conditions may warrant, to those parts which pertain to the people, according to tho norm laid down in Art. 36 of this Constitution.

    Nevertheless steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them.

    Now, how much Latin has the average Catholic heard at Mass lately? And how many Catholics today know the Mass parts (Sanctus/Holy, Holy, Holy, Gloria, Angus Dei/Lamb of God, for example) in Latin?

    Like I said, that's just one example. I suggest further reading such as Fr. Thomas Kocik's Reform of the Reform, available from Ignatius Press.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I also welcome a more widespread celebration of the Tridentine Rite, a rite which I think I can rightly call beautiful even though as a recent convert, I have only experienced it through the descritions provided by others. Nevertheless, I am skeptical that any changes in liturgical practice will be forthcoming just because it is no longer required to have explicit episcopal permission to celebrate the ancient rite.

    The reason I say this is that the Novus Ordo rite, as staceyjohnson rightly demonstrates, prefers the use of Latin — and nevertheless there is almost zero use of Latin in the modern Novus Ordo rite as practiced. Thus, no permission is required to celebrate Novus Ordo in Latin, even if the extent of the Latin consists only in a prayer or song, with the rest in the vernacular. And yet, we are stuck with a state in which Latin has been completely banished in some quarters and almost completely banished in most others.

    Given that this is the state of the liturgy today, even though Latin is supposed to have a more prominent role, on what basis can we hope that a freeing up of the Tridentine rite will serve as a cause whose effect is to bring back a more widespread celebration of the ancient Mass in our parishes?

    I don't ask this question lightly, nor do I intend to be cynical. Indeed, our family is ready for the Latin liturgy: we've even incorporated Latin into our homeschool and into the payer life of our Domestic Church. I ask the question because I don't know the answer.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I believe people will become more aware of the sacred at this mass; the "smells and bells" as they say, will give a sense of the Heavenly.  I believe people will understand more thoroughly why it is called a "Sacred Assembly."  We need that today when this is lost to so many Catholics.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I think this is a grand move on the part of Pope Benedict XVI, and it would be nice to have the option to attend a Latin, Tridentine, Mass more easily. However, I don't believe it will "catch on". I foresee a handful of more traditional parishes offering a Tridentine Mass, but I believe things will go on as usual in a great majority of parishes. Most people will claim they don't see the point in attending a Mass in a language they don't understand: can I be effectively praying if I don't know what I am saying? These are serious ideas to consider (some close to me have this opinion). I think this is not the tide-turning event so many believe it will be to returning to the "traditional" Mass (I base this on what I read on other sites; I am new to CE). Hopefully, most see it as simply an increase in freedom to celebrate the Tridentine Mass. My biggest hope is that the Holy See is beginning to put great effort into ceasing the Protestantization of the Catholic Church, especially here in America. Maybe this is a first step.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ave Maria!

    I await the freeing of the Traditional Latin Mass.  I have only been to two of them in my adult life as they are not supposed to be 'allowed' in our diocese.  Our Masses are banal that I have taken to bringing my old missal to pray and prepare to receive Our Lord.  The songs are terrible! They are not worshipful of God but only about us! Many are not Catholic at all. I am not singing these secular songs about being bread or some such nonsense. Our pastor recently gave a homily with his explanation of Mass–a gathering of the community to give thanks and share a meal!

     

    We  have lost the knowledge of the HOLY SACRIFICE We are told that everything we do is holy and we are wonderful and that God loves us as we are and we need not do more. Everyone is welcome at the 'table'. Sunday Mass has become something to endure yet the Prize is priceless so we endure.  There is a whole false theology being presented.

    The novus ordo was the anglican book of common prayer liturgy from the 16th century. When we lost our Mass, we lost the knowledge of sacrifice and the need for conversion and repentance before God.

    As we pray, so we believe.

    It will take time but with our Liturgy restored, it is beleived by many that our faith will deepen.  We lost the 'Mysterium Fidei'–the mystery of faith that Christ is truly present in the most Blessed Sacrament!

    The cost in souls has been great. May the Holy Father not delay!

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Where the Latin Mass is in a church,the whole neibour hood improves. In

    Ky, and Ohio, and Chicago. And the chuchs fill up.

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I too hope the motu proprio occurs in the near future.  Even if not all parishes include the practice of offering the Tridentine Rite, the ones that do and, beyond that, the gesture itself toward hieghtened worship and reverance can't but help to have a positive influence on current modes of worship and behaviors, both in and out of Mass. 

     

    However, I wish to caution against referring (without significant theological qualification) to the widespread inclusion of the rite as ushering in the so-called "traditional Mass" which had putatively been "swept away."  There is, properly speaking, one Mass, inaugurated co-temporaneously at the Last Supper and Calvary, which Catholics heretofore participate in (and all other Christians in a state of grace however remotely).  Nothing essential was lost at the introduction of the Novus Ordo.  The New Order or Rite was, is, and always will be, a part of the living Tradition of the Church.  The Novus Ordo is therefore, essentially and metaphysically, theologically, traditional (and so too are all those (imprudent?) remissions of the Latin by bishops and pastors at the approval of the Holy See). To deny this would be folly, for it would imply that the Magisterium can act outside the living Tradition of the Church.  Referring to the "Traditional Mass" as "perennial" and "ancient" also needs to be qualified.  Yes, the Mass is such, but the Tridentine Rite wasn't around in the early centuries of the Church. 

     

    I point to these rather obvious qualifications, in part, because the tone of the above article has a certain "told you so, stupid" quality to it that acts against the unity of the (orthodox) Church, which certainly is what Pope Benedict is all about.  We have to be strongly united interiorly if we hope to lead the charge toward a unified Christendom–one of the current pope's (and Christ's!) major appeals.  

     

     

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Humbly, I submit some often overlooked benefits regarding the "freeing" of the Traditional Roman Rite: the seminaries where in priests are prepared for offering the Traditional Mass and Sacraments are, on the whole, much better prepared doctrinally, philosophically and liturgically, and they are nearly always more well-formed with respect to character and moral behavior.  The proof here is in the pudding – I speak not only from experience – but also from the statistics of those said priests who have continued to be faithful to their duties and the very few who have given any type of scandal for heretical beliefs, offensive liturgical insensitivity and "inappropriate conduct" in regard to children.  The Old Mass makes a priest more disciplined – partly because there are practically no "options" or "this or similar words" added to the rubrics, as is numerous in the new Missal.  Perhaps further study should be done on this aspect of the Old Mass's benefit for priests, not just for the eager faithful.

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Bring it back.  It will only improve our wonderful, sacred, Catholic Church!  And hurry.  Why wait?

     

    GK – God is good!

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

     

    The Mass is both the one and only, supreme sacrificial act of Christ, and a "gathering of community around the table to give thanks and share a meal". After all, Eucharist means thanksgiving, for the meal and the sacrifice. I was raised with the pre-Vatican II liturgy, encountering the liturgical changes in college. Having now both celebrated and endured those changes for forty years, I also celebrate the growing appreciation of the "traditional" Latin liturgy. I've sung in church choirs all my life, most of them classical, and have a love of the great liturgical music of the ages and would love to see its resurgence. My son and his family are members in a Latin indult parish, because they find the formality and reverence within the Tridentine Mass both challenging and nurturing of their faith. However, Vatican II has taken root in me, and while appreciating the "bells and smells" and the language of the Tridentine liturgy, it is surprisingly a foreign experience for me.

    A peculiar method of handling differences is practiced in one local parish. Latin is used for the responses, but English for most of the liturgy. At some Masses the priest faces the high altar, but for others, a portable altar is wheeled out to accommodate the priest facing the congregation. It seems a fitting symbol of the confusion we are encountering, and I understand the need to come to some unity that will reflect and promote the Church as one.

    I'm no scholar, but it seems to me that the best of both worlds is a possibility. God is both transcendent and immanent, the Mass is both sacrifice and a meal. It seems to me our liturgy should be inclusive of both. Was Vatican II a mistake liturgically, or just poorly implemented, and even more poorly explained? Whatever comes in the Motu Proprio, let us hope that the local parishes offer guidance regarding the changes, so that we can all embrace them and do not have to endure the same kind of pain and confusion of forty years ago.

     

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    hislittlelamb quoted Vat II as follows: "Pope John wished the Council "to increase the fervour and energy of Catholics, to serve the needs of Christian people." To achieve this purpose, bishops and priests must grow in holiness; the laity must be given effective instruction in Christian faith and morals; adequate provision must be made for the education of children; Christian social activity must increase; and all Christians must have missionary hearts."

    Ironically, I think quite the opposite has happened among American Catholics. especially with regard to holiness of priests and bishops and the instruction of Christian faith and morals.  In case you think I'm harsh, has anybody heard about the plagues of divorce, contraception, abortion, materialism in our country?  You can lay that at the feet of weak bishops and priests.  Maybe they should have done more fasting and less "Kumbaya-ing".  And forget about educating children…there aren't any….or many at least!  Check out a tradional mass and you'll see a place overflowing with children and parents–male and female parents–who are married to each other for the first and only marriage.

    Thank you Holy Father for the return of our culture which embodies our beliefs about the Trinity.

     

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    My pastor astutely teaches that no matter how "bad" any Mass may be (weak preaching, lousy hymns, or poor behavior of the laity) it still merits the same infinite graces as a High Mass concelebrated by the Pope and all the Cardinals of the world. I'm no theologian here so excuse me if I'm wrong, but so long as a validly ordained priest (in good standing) conecrates unleavened wheat bread and grape wine upon an altar, the Holy Mass is licitly celebrated.

    So if the basics are met, should we really care about the quality of the Mass? Of course we should! I believe as many, that the beauty and meaning of our liturgy is important. I shudder to think of the damage caused by Halloween Costume Masses and the like.

    In these times when there is indeed so much bad liturgy, I take particular solace in the Fourth Joyful Mystery of the Rosary. Despite the corruption of the Jewish religious authorities, widespread abuses of the sacrificial system, and the spiritual malaise of many people, Simeon was in the Temple seeking his Savior. He and Anna were not dissapointed and they give us a great example of faithfulness in a time of distress.

    Where there is room for elevating our worship of God, let us do so in obedience to the Church and know that these things will happen in God's time, not ours. I too, look forward to greater piety and reverence in Catholic worship. In the end however, I have to trust the Holy Spirit to be the one who guides us in renewing the holiness of the Mass.

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks to all of you for writing such eloquent words that have taught me a lot today.  However, I still can't get over how early many of you submitted your comments.

    I agree with "factoti" and love that we, followers, are called to be docile and obedient to the Church and trust the Holy Spirit to do its job.  I know I am not a Church leader, so I follow and thank God he has given me the Grace to have a place at the table.

     

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Go B16! Go!

    GK – God is good!

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    You can't go back to the Golden Age because it never existed.

     

    Latin is fine but to completely abandon the ,odern liturgy and expect nmiracles is silly.

  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    quote:
    The article didn't say that the Second Vatican Council was abrupt, but that the changes to the Mass were. 



    Any change would be considered "abrupt", there having to be a certain point where the old rite is no longer used universally by the Church in favor of the new *universal* rite. Even though the Council lasted over 3 years it still took even longer to actually implement the changes so that it was close to a decade before most Parishes had implemented the Novus Ordo Rite. That's about as far from being an "abrupt" change as I can imagine.


    As someone who lived during this time I can attest that it was quite slow, and awkwardly so as our Parish adapted. In fact, at my home Parish we were still kneeling at the communion rail when I left the Church in the early 70's. 
  19. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Kneeling at the communion rail and the Novus Ordo Mass are not mutually exclusive. For that matter, neither are the use of Latin, the celebration of Mass ad orientam (with the priest and the people facing the same direction, towards the altar), Gregorian Chant (which is supposed to have "pride of place" in the liturgy even to this day) and any other number of things that we tend to associate with the Tridentine Mass.

     

  20. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I pray that your wishes for the revival of the old liturgy (latin masses) is not being driven by the mystics or wonders it brings in to you.

    honestly, I was not able to reach those latin masses, I can only account based on the stories of my parents. We might feel obviously opposite, hearing latin prayers sounds so solemn to me, in fact in our Church quartet where I am a member, I love to sing "Ave Maria" in latin in every Marian feasts. There s something in me that feels so mystified, yet on the contrary I only understand few of these words like "gratia" and "Ave Maria" only, thus making it less penetrating to me unlike the prayer "Hail Mary" in english and "Maghimaya ka Maria" in our vernacular. The benefit of understanding every word you utter in prayer makes it more personal and closer to your heart. Why so? Language is the greatest manifestation of one's culture and custom. Thus making my GOD as close as my whole being, it makes feel so accepted in every aspect of myself. Remember one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit to the apostles? That the apostles were able to proclaim the word of God in their own native languages that made them understood it well. Why not we work at the same way?

    The translation of the liturgy into the vernaculars is the move of the Church to get closer to the people of God than on the other way around. Plus it was made more personal when they change the position of the priest to face the faithful in the celebration to make the faithful to be a co-celebrant of the liturgy. Please be always obedient to the church' teachings. Feel the presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist than paying more attention to the words being used. It is His presence that makes the whole liturgy and none of such revisions could reduce it! Thus, in every celebration whether it is in Latin or in vernacular the presence of Christ is still there and that's where we must look on.

    a young catholic from the Philippines.

    erwin salubre

  21. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I was born in 1970. I welcome any attempt by the pope to correct the liturgy, but like others I don't believe this will have a sudden widespread effect on the abuses that are currently occuring in the American church. I don't see my priest suddenly switching to the Latin mass from his self-styled mass anytime soon. However, what it will do is create an even wider divide between the two Catholic camps in this country. I'm not saying this is bad! I believe there needs to be a clear distinction between the two, because in my mind, they are not of the same church. I think we have to realize that we are really two churches trying to simultaneouly co-exist and as far as I can tell, it ain't working. I'm not saying we should kick those other people out, but we should be honest and fair and say that this IS what the Roman Catholic Church believes and if you do not agree then this is not your Church. I know this does not fit in with the uniting of Christians, but the pope did say that in the future he sees a smaller, more faithful Catholic Church.

    We must do what we can to educate our fellow Catholics in the truth and show them the beauty of the Roman Catholic Church. But this business of having one Catholic insisting that abortion is murder and another Catholic insisting that abortion is a good choice is just plain nonsense! The two can never be reconciled under the same truth. The same goes for any adamant rejection of Church teaching. 

    Many people have been very damaged by liturgical abuse. It's called "abuse" for a reason. Just think of what other kinds of abuse there are – alcohol, drug, emotional, physical, sexual. It always means that someone or something uses its power to overwhelm and harm a weaker victim. It not only affects just the victim, but their loved ones as well. Let's apply this to abuse of the liturgy and we have the priest using his power to distort the liturgy. The victim is in a sense the church or the body of Christ which in turn means us. People's souls are being hurt. This is obviously not good. I have to believe the pope knows this and is going to do what he believes to be in his power to stop this.

    I trust that Benedict XVI is being guided by the Holy Spirit in each step he takes towards reclaiming the liturgy and we must pray for him and for our Church.

Leave a Reply