Catholic Exchange

Spiritual Pollution, Part 2

Last week we talked about the curious taboos that marked the Old Testament. As we discussed, such taboos are not really very strange to us if we think about it, which is why you did not start your day with a heaping helping bowl of nutritious insect larvae, despite the fact that they are perfectly healthy to eat.

My point was that God has taken this natural impulse to say, "Ick" — to regard certain things as "defiling" — and, as with many other natural things, raised it by grace to teach a spiritual lesson.  The image of food too gross to eat and things too disgusting to touch was and is an apt image of sin, which sickens the soul as much as maggots sicken the stomach.  The problem is, it's easy to confuse the image for the reality.  That is why Jesus had to starkly instruct his followers that it was not food that defiled, but sin.

The beauty of this ugly image is that it really does communicate the social nature of sin, something that is lost on many moderns.  The common belief sounded in our culture is "Who cares if somebody sins in private?  It doesn't hurt anybody else!"   But the reality is that spiritual pollution, like physical pollution, is everybody's problem.

The funny thing is that those who deny the reality that sin can pollute a culture have no problem seeing that hydrocarbons can pollute an atmosphere.  Those who are often most acutely sensitive to the dangers of exposing a region to electromagnetic radiation have no problem exposing that same region to electromagnetic radiation known as "the lyrics of the latest cop killer rap" or a filthy TV show.  Such people are oblivious to the fact that sin is a sort of "air pollution" too and that what we exhale in private is inevitably inhaled elsewhere.

Take Madonn a.  I've never bought a Madonna album, never attended one of her concerts, never seen any of her (reputedly terrible) films.  But I know all about her.  So do you.  We know all about the various blasphemies, the various incarnations and transformations from Material Girl to Crucified Dance Diva.  You can't get away from it.  It's in the very water we drink.

Our kids can't get away from it either.  In a classic column, Peggy Noonan described the culture in which the Columbine killers — and we — live.  The air is full of:

. . . was found strangled and is believed to have been sexually molested . . . had her breast implants removed . . . took the stand to say the killer was smiling the day the show aired . . . said the procedure is, in fact, legal infanticide . . . is thought to be connected to earlier sexual activity among teens . . . court battle over who owns the frozen sperm . . . contains songs that call for dominating and even imprisoning women . . . died of lethal injection . . . had threatened to kill her children . . . said that he turned and said, "You better put some ice on that" . . . had asked Kevorkian for help in killing himself . . . protested the game, which they said has gone beyond violence to sadism . . . showed no remorse . . . which is about a wager over whether he could sleep with another student . . . which is about her attempts to balance three lovers and a watchful fiancé . . .

"This", says Noonan, "is the ocean in which our children swim. This is the sound of our culture. It comes from all parts of our culture and reaches all parts of our culture, and all the people in it, which is everybody…"

Which is why God chose to use the image of pollution–of some all-soiling, all-pervading contaminant, like an infectious agent, or cooties, or leprosy, or sewage-stained water — to portray what sin is and what it does.  Because sin is not something that happens in private. It is not something we can keep to ourselves.  It inevitably gets out, like the ebola virus, and wreaks havoc with the whole of human society.

This pervading polluting quality of sin is also why Christ refused to make the cure for it — mercy and forgiveness — a purely private and individualistic affair.  Instead of simply saying, "All you have to do is pause briefly where you are, tell God you are sorry for your murder, theft, adultery, and blasphemy, and then go on free as a bird" he insisted upon instituting the sacrament of Reconciliation — so that the Body harmed by sin can participate in the healing of that sin and be the means by which the sinner is brought back into a love relationship, not just with God, but with the people he has harmed.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Proverbs 14:34 states that "Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people." Mark's presentation on "spiritual pollution" helps explain why sin, even if private, brings reproach upon a people.

    Thus, a true national patriot works inward to bring righteousness into his own life and outward by actively engaging in "temporal affairs", "directing them according to God's will." (CCC 898).

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Minor point — I would have appreciated the article without the picture of Madonna.  A picture of garbage floating in water would have been less nauseating.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    If the news bothers you, then turn off the tv set. If your children are being bombarded with bombast, then explain to them why it is harmful to focus on the deeds of darkness. What Mark fails to understand, is that all of the poor examples he cited can actually be used by parents to contrast the good with the bad. Centuries ago, this task was more difficult because all the evil was "hidden". Now that it is out in the open, it is much easier to identify and condemn and better still, everyone can come to agreement on what is bad for society no matter how liberal your thinking is. Our work is to live in the world we were born into and today's apostles have their work cut out for them. The major problem with Mark's article is that he fails to follow scripural advise from Saint Paul, "If you have a disagreement with anyone,  reprove that person first, if the person fails to listen to you, then reprove that person before witnesses, and if that fails, then bring the matter before the church". Poor Madonna was not even given a chance by Mark to explain the reason for her behavior. Mark simply jumped right over the prescription of the testament to make a spectacle out of Madonna. I hope you are reading this comment Mark because it is meant for you. I suggest that you immediately apologize to Madonna formally.In the Holy Love of God I am your brother in Christ and my name is Roy

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Upon reading the article and comments, I offer a thought.

    First I can't help but to agree with almost everyone.

    Second is that I think most importantly we need to put on Love and allow the fruits of the Holy Spirit to grow in our lives. This will not only be a filter for the pollution of sin but will also be the encouragement and nourshiment we all need to battle sin.

    I Have one litte dissagrement with the article. I can't get myself to believe that I'm breathing in someone elses sins. We Live in a world as did the Doctors and Fathers of the Church. There is sin here.  We are called to be a Light set befor all. Sin brings darkness, It is a pollutant to our eternal souls. But not a pollutant to others souls directly. We are all called to follow Christ. We choose this, even with the temtation of sin. So what you suggest about sin I disagree with.  Peace of Christ.

      

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Roy,

    Regarding "if the news bothers you, then turn off the tv set."

    I remember when I first saw a bumper sticker: "Against Abortion? Don't Have One." I was tempted to put on my car: "Against killing animals for fur? Don't buy a fur coat." A myriad of similar questions could be asked: "Against child abuse? Don't hit your child." or "Against drunken driving? Don't…"

    Well, you get the idea.

    All of us – not just "religious" folks – want the law to have a role in setting a certain moral tone. Consider the seventh and eighth commandments: "You shall not lie. You shall not steal." People are constantly breaking their promises (lying) and defrauding (stealing).

    We have no hesitation in using the law to teach the crook a lesson. In doing so we want to impose a little morality on him; to have him acknowledge the seriousness of his actions. We also hope to send a message to other people, that is, to set a certain moral tone for our society.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Wow Roy…

    Mark does not fail to understand anything of the sort. If you have ever read anything else by Mark Shea you would realize that. He is making an entirely different point.

    Madonna doesn't want to explain herself. She was raised Catholic for Heavens sake. The only excuse that she could hope to make for her behavior would be mental illness. She hasn't suggested ever being even slightly repentant for offending MY mother, The Church, so grieviously.

    I do not condemn her as a person, but we do have the right to condemn her behavior.

    "Poor" Madonna has made a spectacle out of herself, and I pray for her. I really do hope that at some time in the future she will help to dispell some of the fog of the culture of immorality that she has made her fortune from.

     

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mark, Thank you for your article and the courage to say things that need to be said so we can dialoge in a way so obviously seen today in these comments. The "sideliners" are always out there waiting to pounce and defend the way they live with every excuse in The Book…. Blessyou&Mary keep you, Rica p.s.  Mtoberjj, Read again. Your "one little dissagrement" is the the whole article.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    This is an excellent article.  Our personal sins do have a ripple affect on others – our family and our community.

    In this week’s Scripture study of the Gospel of John I found: Fish that live in the constant darkness of caverns are blind, and people can also be “blinded” by the darkness of their own sinfulness.  When we choose not to seek the truth but desire to remain in darkness and sin, we are blinding ourselves and hardening our hearts.

    Madonna’s picture in the article could also be a reminder that takes courage to publicly profess our faith in Jesus.

    Peace to all,

     –Vi

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Well thought out article.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Roy:

    I can't help but get the sensation that if I said "2+2=4" you would both take offense and disagree vehemently.  I appreciate your charmingly naive advice that I just pick up the phone and call Madonna to set her straight and I *really* enjoy your denunciation of my making a "spectacle" of a woman who has herself publicly crucified on a glittering mirror cross to the tune of millions of dollars and adoring fans.

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Indirectly our sins do have an impact on our church.  Because we are one in the Body of Christ.  If the body is infested with sin it is not healthy. That is why we need the sacraments so.  But God is bigger than this thought of spiritual pollution. If we are receiving the sacraments regularly and growing in our faith and living it out than we have nothing to worry about. Faith is more than just an awareness it calls us to action. So to say I sin or fall to the temptaion of sin it directly affects my brother in Christ is china is just absurd. The same cleansing grace is there for the both of us. I do disagree with the article on some points but I encourage more people to write articles that bring attention back to our wonderful, diverse, Roman Catholic Faith. Peace of Christ.

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    One point–I thought Madonna was excellent in "Evita".  Just to be fair, here.

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Execellent article again Mark.  To me at least, you seem to hit many points right on the head in your diverse articles.  I thought your comments on torture were also quite apt, and straight out of the heart of the Church.  Thank you!

     

    "[L]et us love not in word or speech but in deed and truth" (1Jn 3:18).

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mark, thanks for another good article. I typically read and remain silent, however, today I did want to respond to mtoberjj's comment.

    First you said that, "I can't get myself to believe that I'm breathing in someone else’s sins. We Live in a world as did the Doctors and Fathers of the Church. There is sin here.  We are called to be a Light set before all. Sin brings darkness, It is a pollutant to our eternal souls. But not a pollutant to others souls directly."

     I answer that, just as original sin affects our soul directly so does a person's personal sin affect us. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that as a society we are "bound together organically by a principle of unity that goes beyond each one of [us].  By means of society each [of us] . . . receives certain 'talents' that enrich [our] identity" (CCC 1880). It stands to reason that if we receive certain "talents" by virtue of society we can also receive certain negative influences, for lack of a better word. Hence, the sin of Adam and Eve, or original sin, affects everyone. The Catechism also teaches that sin results in a "negative influence exerted on people by . . . social structures that are the fruit of men's sins." (CCC 408) Later in CCC 1869, we are told that "sin makes men accomplices of one another and causes concupiscence, violence, and injustice to reign among them."

    Jesus’ admonition that “he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea,”  (Matthew 18:6 Douay-Rheims) is a good example of how the sins of one may affect another. In this case by causing them to sin, especially a little one.

    Second, you said that, “We are all called to follow Christ. We choose this, even with the temptation of sin.”

    Yes, we are called to follow Christ and the Church does teach that “sin is a personal act.” However “we have a responsibility for the sins committed by others when we cooperate in them.” (CCC 1868) We can cooperate by not “disclosing them or by not hindering them when we have an obligation to do so.” (Ibid). Cain’’s question, “am I my brothers keeper” implies that we do in fact have that obligation.

    Blessings

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    A couple of remarks in response to Roy.  Turning off the TV set is a good idea; however, not because it bothers me, but because objectively it is full of so much trash that no one should expose himself to.  There is something inside us (if our conscience is formed well) that enables us to distinguish between right and wrong without having to expose ourselves to the evil present on the silver screen in order to learn what actions or behaviors are right and which ones are wrong.  The catechism is the right place to form one's conscience, not the TV.

    In regard to your remark on Madonna–  She is a public sinner, and as such, her actions need to be condemned publicly.  We do not–in fact, cannot–judge her for her actions, for only God can read the hearts of man.  However, we can, and must say (when the occasion calls for it) that her actions are objectively sinful.  To do so, is to instruct those who (somehow) might fall into sin because of her deeds.  So, I disagree with you that a personal apology is needed.  On the contrary, a public apology is needed on her part for the scandal that she may have caused.  And, of course, when she comes to mind, we should pray for her.  God loves her, and if we call ourselves Christians, we should too.  Perhaps one day, with the grace of God, we will be with her in heaven.

    God bless!

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Dear Protect the Rock, I am a firm believer in, "If you dont like the moral setting and the morality of the people you are with, then be the first one to set a good example by protesting the behavior and disassociating with those who refuse to stop it. How is all this bad behavior going to slow down or end if no one protests the immorality. To coin a new phrase, become a "Catholic Protestant" except do not protest the Catholic church, protest the immorality of the United States or whatever country you live in. In the Holy Love of God I am your brother in Christ and my name is Roy

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Whoah there fella, slow down. I'm not reading where the author has slandered Madonna. What he says is:


    "We know all about the various blasphemies, the various incarnations and transformations from Material Girl to Crucified Dance Diva.  You can't get away from it.  It's in the very water we drink."


    I think you missed the point, or at least the point as I see it is that even though Mark hasn't personally bought any of her albums or gone to see her movies, her actions or antics are all around him so that these images of her mockery of crucifixion in Rome, among others, whether actually seen or not are in our minds. Her blasphemy is ever before us, we cannot erase what we know. 


    It's not about Madonna, he could have just as easily put Rosie O'Donnell or a plethora of other celebrities who we have just TMI about. It's that these actions of those around us poison us in a way, seeping in to our minds like second hand smoke and pollute the moral conscience of society.
    Angels fly because they take themselves lightly. G.K. Chesterton
  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest
    Dear Roy,
    With all due respect, your posts lack charity in tone and expression.  You clearly are acting licentiously in your rebuttals.  You owe all readers of this forum an apology, especially Mark Shea.  You could have taken your own advice and written a nice letter to Mr. Shea, which would have constituted the personal reproof you insist upon.  Posting to the forum as you have is the second step; reproof before witnesses.  Please follow the code of ethics you have outlined and also take time to think about your words before posting again.
    Thank you.
  19. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    As Christians we seek all that is good, true and beautiful. For the most part, commercial TV is anything but "good", "true" or "beautiful." 

    We found the article helpful and easy to read and comprehend.

    I'd love to see another article such as this addressing the 9 ways one  might contribute to another's sin. Can't recall all of them but here's a sampling: via flattery, by encouraging one verbally or otherwise to turn away from Christ and His laws of love,  false praise, intentionally concealing the truth….

    Unfortunately many of us live with the secondary effects of chain smokers and have literally inhaled the excesses of another's vice. Along a similar vein, many have taken in sin in our ears, the detractions spoken in our presence of others. The ill effects of divorce are felt directly in our homes and/or families. The sins of those other parts of the Body is often tangible, felt with one's senses.  

    Christ's peace.  

     

Leave a Reply