Catholic Exchange

Render to Caesar

Despite their flattering words, they were trying to trap him, to force him into a no-win situation.  Consider the circumstances.  They were living under the iron boot of a brutal empire which filled the earth with its idolatry.  Patriotic Jews longed to throw off the yoke of the tyrants.  They prayed for an anointed king who would free them from the Romans as David had freed them from the Philistines.  Anyone advocating collaboration with the invaders could not possibly be the hoped-for Messiah.  No, he would appear as a traitor.  But on the other hand, anyone preaching resistance to Rome would be branded an enemy of the Empire and would wind up suspended from a cross.

So the Pharisees decided to put Jesus on the spot in front of the crowd.  They asked Him a question bound to get Him into trouble one way or the other.  “Is it lawful to pay taxes to the Emperor or not?”

First of all, Jesus teaches us how to deal with a bogus theological question.  He unmasks it for what it is, an effort to trip Him up rather than an inquiry proceeding from a sincere desire to know the truth.  And then, rather than letting Himself be controlled and put on the spot, He takes charge of the conversation and puts the Pharisees on the spot.  He answers a question with a question.  “Whose head is on that coin that you have in your pocket, the coin that you are using to pay for the temporal necessities of life?”  “Caesar’s.”  Next Jesus says something that makes them think, much as He did with the men eager to stone the woman caught in adultery (John 8).  “Then give to Caesar what is Caesar, but give to God what is God’s” (Mat 22:15-21).

Jesus wins the battle.  He transforms an attempt to make Him look bad into a teaching moment recorded for all time, providing all peoples and ages with some very important food for thought

Government is a fact of life.  Rulers, laws, police, taxes.  What should a worshipper of God make of it?

One thing Jesus points out to the Pharisees is that they participate in this societal infrastructure.  They don’t live on a deserted island but are dependent upon the imperial system for everything from the food in the marketplace to protection from thieves.  One rural community in the US recently celebrated their independence after seceding from the nearby township and its taxes.  A few days later, they were unpleasantly surprised when the town trash trucks failed to show up.

Jesus says we can’t have it both ways — if we benefit from secular society, we need to support the infrastructure of society.  This can take the form of taxes, military service, jury duty, and informed, conscientious voting.

On the other hand, Jesus says that we need to give to God what is God’s.  This is the real punch line of the story.  For God has given us everything.  In fact, it is He who raises up kings and nations and through them provides for us.  The Lord used the Babylonians to punish the stubborn disobedience of the kingdom of Judah.  But when the time of exile was completed, God used the pagan Persian king, Cyrus, to break the stranglehold of Babylon and allow the Chosen People to return home.  The prophet Isaiah even calls this unbeliever the messiah or anointed one (Is 45:1-6)!

But there are also times when political rulers overstep their authority.  Sometimes, they demand to be worshiped, as Caesar did.  Other times they attack human dignity, violating natural law which demands that innocent human life be respected and that liberty be protected.  These are times when Christians have a duty boldly to insist that while Caesar is owed his due, we won’t stand by and silently watch him step on God’s toes.

Comments

7 responses to “Render to Caesar”

  1. Arkanabar Ilarsadin Avatar

    It’s my opinion that taking care of the poor, the needy, the less fortunate — in short, social welfare programs — should be rendered to God, not Caesar. See http://arkanabar.tripod.com/grants.html for a more developed argument.

  2. DonHudzinski Avatar
    DonHudzinski

    Arkanabar llarsadin

    Is this a seperation of church and state statement?

  3. mrteachersir Avatar
    mrteachersir

    Don,

    It doesn’t need to be. Prior to the dissolution of the monasteries in England under Henry VIII, the monks and nuns provided for the poor in their nearby communitites. When Henry spoiled the coffers of the monasteries, he brought that responsibility upon government.

    There are also issues of dependability: can we trust a government who excels at wasteful spending and gross mismanagement with the help so many millions nees, or should we trust the charity of the Church and her members, who can see the faces of millions and help their particular needs?

  4. momof11 Avatar
    momof11

    Whose image is on the coin? In whose image is the person made? That made in the image of God belongs to God. Who is to say whether a person lives or dies? Government oversteps its bounds when legalizing that which breaks God’s commands in regards to human behavior…abortion, euthanasia, marriage, sexuality.

  5. Arkanabar Ilarsadin Avatar

    Don,
    it’s a minarchist statement — I am a firm believer that if the government left things alone, they would nearly always be better.

  6. tednkate Avatar
    tednkate

    Here’s an intersting little piece on Roman/Church history. “Faith based initiatives” have a rather long history, and they do not always end so happily.

    http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=3461

    Essentially, once Emperor Constantine gave the Church his blessing, state funds went into the Church coffers. The Church became dependent, and when Emporer Julian cut funding, the Church was crippled for awhile.

    In our own area, a local bishop is publicly supporting a modest (only an additonal $35 on a $100,000 house) property tax initiative in order to give basic health care “for the poor”. (Administered by the County). If this passes, and I think it probably will, it won’t be long before those tax monies go for contraception and abortion, or at least abortion referals.

    And then what? Will the bishop end of having to spend his time and Church monies trying to fight the very thing he help to bring about?

    I agree with Arkanabar Illarsadin. I cannot think of too many good things or good ideas the government hasn’t managed to make a mess of.

  7. noelfitz Avatar
    noelfitz

    This is a great article.

    It is balanced and thoughtful.

    It is amazing how history repeats itself.

    I read in the Letter to Diognetus (written between 150 and 200 AD):

    “5. For Christians are not distinguished from the rest of humanity by country, language, or custom. (2) For nowhere do they live in cities of their own, nor do they speak some unusual dialect, nor do they practice an eccentric life-style…

    (6) They marry like everyone else, and have children, but they do not expose (equivalent to abort, NF) their offspring. (7) They share their food but not their wives. (8) They are “in the flesh,” but they do not live “according to the flesh.” (9) They live on earth, but their citizenship is in heaven…

    6. In a word, what the soul is to the body, Christians are to the world.”

    Michael William Holmes, The Apostolic Fathers : Greek Texts and English Translations (Updated ed.; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1999), 541.

Leave a Reply