Catholic Exchange

Parish Lawsuits About Greed, Not Abuse

America's legal system has become the envy of the world by promising "equal justice for all." We don't seek different penalties for a given offense on the basis of a defendant's religion or economic status. Unless, of course, the defendant happens to be the Catholic Church.

How else can we explain the fervor of abuse lawsuits against the Church, while no comparable attention is paid to public schools? There, sex abuse is statistically hundreds of times more prevalent, but without the context of religion or private assets.

A 2004 study by the U.S. Department of Education showed that nearly 10 percent of America's public school students have endured unwanted sexual attention from teachers or school employees. Fully 6.7 percent reported suffering sexual "contact misconduct" — which may range from pinching, to kissing, to full-scale sexual relations with a school employee. Meanwhile, it has become common for school officials, fearing scandal, to release offenders with a favorable job recommendation. Michael Crowley, senior editor of The New Republic, writes that administrators actually refer to this practice as "passing the trash."

Sex abuse is intolerable — regardless of the context. Abusers deserve the fullest punishment of law, and it makes no difference whether the abuser is a teacher or a priest. So why does our attention focus almost exclusively on the church?

San Diego County is home to one million Catholics. About 150 abuse claims have been filed, representing approximately 0.015 percent — fifteen-thousandths of one percent — of the local Catholic population. And these claims have been aggregated over a 50-year period. In other words, public school students are statistically about 450 times more likely to suffer sexual abuse at school today than San Diego County Catholics have been, over the past 50 years, in their parishes.

 For a better understanding, suppose you could use one pencil to represent a single allegation of sex abuse. Your desk drawer can hold 150 pencils — the total number of complaints against the Diocese dating back half a century.

Now imagine 3.3 million pencils. Most of us can't. So, think of a chain of pencils, end-to-end, about 400 miles long — starting in Temecula and stretching all the way to San Francisco Bay. Each pencil represents one child from the 6.7 percent of students who reported suffering sexual abuse from a school employee in the government's 2004 study.

Should we find this surprising? We know the Church's official teaching on sex outside of marriage, and the sanctity of the sexual relationship. Should it shock us to know that sex abuse is about 4,500% more prevalent in public schools, where we preach a values-free religion of "tolerance" toward every sexual urge, with no mention of marriage?

Shouldn't we instead be celebrating the success of the Church, in keeping sex abuse almost nonexistent by comparison?

Nowhere do we read about $100 million lawsuits against offending public school employees, schools or districts — despite the facts reported by their own federal governing authority. The few living Catholic priests named in the complaints don't figure prominently either. Why?

Ignoring religion for a moment, the answer is private assets. San Diego County contains some of the world's most valuable land, and Catholic parishes collectively represent a lot of real estate. If there were some way to aggregate the land assets of individual parishes, and declare them to be the property of a single entity — the Diocese of San Diego — some lawyers might view the church as a $100 million opportunity just waiting to happen. And against the Church, which created society's concept of sexual morality, allegations of sex abuse carry a greater retributive power than slippery sidewalks or too-hot coffee.

The situation could hardly be more ironic. Lawsuits could threaten to dismantle our Diocese and close Catholic schools. The social-welfare functions of the Church, from caring for the sick to feeding the homeless, could ultimately be damaged beyond repair. And why? Because the Church's sex-abuse record is 450 times safer than that of the typical public school?

Sex abuse is a hideous crime. But these parish lawsuits are about a different kind of abuse. By intentionally "singling out" the least offender to pay the greatest damages, they're an abuse of America's legal system — and one of the most egregious examples of discrimination on record.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Absolutely!  Protestant parishes, whose rate of abuse is comparable to Catholic parishes, are not targeted by lawsuits because they don't have deep pockets;  they aren't insured at the level that the Catholic churches are, and they also don't keep meticulous records that make it easy to track the abuse.  The Catholic church is punished for being well insured and for keeping meticulous records.  Of course, abusers need to be accountable.  But this trend of lawsuits toward the Catholic Church is out of control.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "Shouldn't we instead be celebrating the success of the Church, in keeping sex abuse almost nonexistent by comparison?"

    It is a dangerous precedent, to compare ourselves with other groups. If (as we believe) the Church possesses the fullness of God's revelation, God will hold us to the strictest standard.

    Traditionally, the Church has expected its clergy to live out vows of "poverty, chastity, and obedience." I can't help but wonder if part of the reason that clergy in some dioceses have failed to uphold chastity, is that in many cases we have also failed in the arena of poverty?

    In the Middle Ages, when the institutional Church grew fat with worldly wealth, God raised up the mendicant orders to purify and renew the Church. Is it possible that, in these lawsuits, God is simply working to purify His Bride by taking away her baubles?

    Heidi Hess Saxton Editor, "Canticle" Magazine Blogroll

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The comparison of the number of "contact misconduct incidents" reported in "a study", to the actaul 150 criminal complaints filed in San Diego, is not a fair comparison. This is comparing apples to oranges and the "450 times" conclusion is not valid.

    The point about "private assets" is true, but it isn't just the Catholic Church that is being singled out.  The entire legal system works that way. The lawyers call it "deep pockets" – sue the guy with money.

    I am not so certain the America's legal system is the envy of the world. We are known for having too many lawyers, filing too many law suits, for too many frivolous reasons.  Cases like "O. J.", the woman that collected millions for spilling hot coffee on herself, and now the guy that is suing for $28 million dollars because the cleaners ruined his pants, have made our legal system appear comical.

    I don't think that Jack the Ripper is less evil than the Boston Strangler becuase he only murdered half as many women.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    Yes, evil is as evil does, eh? But, the Church in San Diego County as elsewhere has fostered the good and undermined evil better than any other institution, even as some of its active workers turn to evil. I’ll bear the comparisons, thank you, and urge Catholic or home schools over public schools.

    And, danny, while lawyers strike out at ‘deep pockets’ everywhere, the msm doesn’t seem so eager to ‘make hay’ over the bulk of lawsuits as they do with those about clergical abuse in the Church. The lawyers are sleazy hand in sleazy hand with the msm, who regard the Church, at best, with suspicion.

    Our legal-judicial system does give so much hearing that we hear far too much, far too easily. But, better that than most judicial courts of this world.

    Then again, of course, I would love to hear some solid Dante scholar and poetic writer providing an addendum to the Divine Comedy about a place for many American lawyers, and judges, and the various legislators, etc., who make judicial abuse and activism possible. A branch of hell called the ‘Edwards wing’? Or, not to single one, given the probable name of ‘Too Many to Mention wing’ . . .

    Remember, I love you, too

    Through Christ, with Christ, in Christ,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    It was alway about the money and a good dose of Catholic bashing.

    Sure the sinners are and always will be in the Church. When the "poor" victims and lawyers look at the "S" in IHS they see it this way:"$"

    Goral

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    It isn't just a problem with the Judicial system, but with society in general and our sense of entitlement.  We don't want to earn our money anymore, we want it handed to us.  The best way to do that it to have it handed to us in a fat settlement.  Hey, we're entitled to it anyway, aren't we?

     

    What made this country great two generations ago was the hard work of our grandparents.  Now we're standing on the shoulders of those people and its getting into us into trouble because we didn't have to earn it, but we feel we deserve it nonetheless.  This effects foreign policy, our economy, and yes, our belief that everything should be given to us, even though our grandparents and, to a lesser degree, our parents had to work for it.  Its only going to get worse, unless we start to earn our keep.  What legacy are we going to give the next generation?  There are more students in law school right now, then there are practicing lawyers.  Why?  That's where the money has been portrayed.  The 'deep pocket' mentality needs to stop or the run-away frivolous law-suits are going to only get worse.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am impatient with any discussion on this subject that focuses on the wealth the Church is losing because of the pedophile priests scandal. I am impatient because that tends to hide the real problem, the real loss, the one that counts.  Let me astonish you.  Who cares about the money and real estate?  The Church has already lost a lot more than money.  The Church has lost too much of it's voice – it's moral authority – it's credibility – at a time when Catholics, Christians and our country desperately need the Church to speak out against abortion, the degregation of marriage and the family, secular humanism, the right to worship our God, and on and on.  The Church could lose every nickel and every acre, but if they still held that moral authority to speak out against evil they would still be the Church our Lord commissioned.  Loss of that moral authority lessens the ability of the Church to carry out that commission. Christ did not say – Go forth and buy a lot of real estate.   Vocations have been devestated.  There are fewer worshippers in the pews. Catholic politicians openly defy the teachings of the Church with immunity. I heard a moderator ask – "When are you going to invite the Catholic Church to participate in these discussions?"  The panelist answered – "When priests stop kissing their altar boys".  The audience had a very good laugh.  How can the Church teach against evil when the Church is percieved by so many as being – or at least was for many years – an instrument of evil? If you don't think that is the perception of many priests that left, nuns that left, and lay Catholics that left, so very many other Christians, and even more that don't care about religious matters one way or the other, you are mistaken.  The scandal played to a very large and diverse audience.

    Our Lord will pull the Church through all this on His own schedule, but I doubt if He will worry much about money and real estate – and neither should we. 

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Woah.  Shouldn't the Church and clergy be held to a higher standard?  I think so.  Have any of you ever had a son who served as an accolyte with three — yes three —  pedophiles?  I have.  Although nothing ever happened to my son, which of you would allow your child to be in a sacrasty (or any small room) with a known sex offender?  I wouldn't.  Yet, the bishop(s) who opted to move this trash around took it upon themselves to make that decision for me, the parent.

    Further, I have another son who attends a public high school.  Never has he been taught "tolerance" that remotely resembles an acceptance of sex outside of marriage.  Wisely, that's left to the family — where values are ultimately learned.  In fact, I have found our local public school to be a very Christian atmosphere with excellent teachers and an environment that builds a sense of self-esteem that was lacking in our local Catholic school.
    My oldest is a graduate of Catholic grammar, high school, and college.  My next two are following in his footsteps.  Have any of you visited the dorms of a "Catholic" college lately?  It's quite an eye-opener.  Talk about sex — there's no limit!
    Perhaps you may feel that the Catholic church is being targeted because of it's deep pockets, and maybe there's some truth in that.  But holy Toledo, the Church was ready for a good slap in the face, a wake-up call.  I can't imagine what it would be like to live every day with the devastation wrought by the acts of a "trusted" clergy.  How many of our beloved bishops have actually apologized for "their" role in the sex scandals?  Their apologies are always generic.  
    I love the Church for what it embodies.  I firmly believe in and love the Eucharist.  I am ashamed, as a Catholic, of the long history of the gross misuse of power that has unfortunately become equated with the Catholic church.  I believe we will come through this crisis as a stronger Church, though probably a smaller Church.  There still is, however, an enormous amount of healing and correction that needs to be done.  I think that the heirarchy of the Church is a lot different than the man who came riding into town on the back of a donkey to face a horrific death on a crucifix.  Maybe change will come through the legal system. 
  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I couldn't agree more, Danny.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    This reminds me of an incident at my high school.  It was new and had an agreement with the other local highschools to hire teachers that might want to transfer (as it was 'taking' students that would otherwise have gone to one of those schools).  

     

    One of those teachers was transferred, as it turned out, for precisely the reasons stated in the article.  Within the year he was transfered to our school board's administrative staff, awaiting trial for having sex with one of his students (union rules forbid firing him unless he was convicted so this was the only way to keep him away from students).

     

    It was an eyeopening look at the rules and structures surrounding and sometimes compounding the problem.  The simple fact that the school boards are not allowed to fire a teacher without proven cause due to union rules (at least where I grew up) makes it hard to deal with this as rumours of misconduct can not be considered proof.     At my school the student in question confided in another teacher and was persuaded to testify but this is by the vary nature of the situation unusual.   Most young teenagers targeted by such predators take much longer (if they ever do) to be able to testify to what was done to them. 

    It is hard, very hard when seduced, to first see it for what it is and then to 'betray' the seducer by telling someone else and very, very hard to agree to officially testify, particularly given the high chances that this will become general knowledge.  

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    PGunther,

        I completely agree that the Church should be held to a higher standard, and that serious reforms are needed regarding the way sex abuse is handled in the Church.  However, I do feel it's unfair that the Church is singled out compared with Protestant clergy who have comparable rates of abuse.  And as far as transferring the priests, yes, that was a bad idea, but most of this went on in the 80s when not much was known about sex abuse.  These priests were sent to rehab, and back then experts felt that they could be trusted again after going through rehab.

         I also completely agree with Danny that the biggest loss is the loss of credibility, and I think this is unfair, too.  Yes, the Church should be held to a higher standard, and the public has the right to be outraged that something like this has occurred in a Church that is supposed to be holy.  But it isn't right that the media and the general public wants to silence the Church and dismiss it's innocent priests and leaders because of the actions of a small minority.

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Clair:  You say that most of the abuse went on in the 80s.  I think that's a very naive statement.  I think that's just the ones we know about.  Perhaps it's that most of the cases that have currently come to the public eye date back to the 80s.  And . . . who cares when they happened?  Ignorance is no excuse for the lack of compassion that was the mark of bishops who refused to admit that they personally made some blatently horrible and life altering mistakes.  The Catholic church, with all its education, health and charitable organizations is a much bigger target than Protestants.  Who cares?  I for one can't blame anyone who may look for vindication as a way of healing from such a trauma as being abused by a trusted member of the clergy.  We need some new leaders in the Church — starting from the top.  We need spiritual leaders — not rulers!  Maybe if the bishops had children of their own they wouldn't have been so eager to reassign pedaphiles. 

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    There are plenty of bishops who made bad choices.  However, a lot of them did so on good faith based on the recommendations of the "experts" who treated the abusers.  I care about the Catholic church being a bigger target than the Protestants because it's unfair that our church shoulders all the blame and loses credibility moreso than the protestant church does.  I don't blame the victims who sue, I blame the lawyers who exploit them and the media who vindicates the Catholic church while ignoring the fact that there is plenty of blame to go around both in other denominations and other professions.  If you read my previous comment, you will see that I agree with you that serious reforms are needed in the Church.  I don't for one moment discount the atrocities that have occurred toward the victims.  I just don't appreciate the fact that the Church as a whole is being demonized for the actions of a small minority, one that exists in other denominations as well.

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    As a Catholic, other denominations are not my concern.  And perhaps you can argue that Bishops made good-faith decisions based on recommendations by experts, but where's the apology or remorse now that we are where we are?  Forget about the protestants, they can handle their own mess.  The Catholic church looks silly in light of all the recent events.  The Catholic church must take its lumps and hopefully move on and learn from our mistakes.  It's time to stop further victimizing the victims.  It's time to be a more tolerant, inclusive, and loving church.  It's time to learn from mistakes.  We exclude gays, divorced Catholics, consider the use of birth control a sin, and until lately protected the clergy beyond what is morally acceptable.  Who did Jesus exclude?  He loves everyone — the leppers, tax collectors, prostitutes.  But I believe he especially loves those who are most vulnerable, those who have suffered at the hands of a trusted clergy.  When the Catholic church opens it arms to all, then I believe the law suits will go away.

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Gays are not excluded.  They are welcome to come to Church, they just aren't allowed to receive Communion if they are practicing homosexual acts, because anyone in a state of mortal sin is supposed to abstain from Communion.  Divorced Catholics are allowed to receive Communion as long as they aren't remarried without an annulment.  You are completely distorting the issues here.  Clearly you have a lot of resentment toward the Church, and it seems to be related to lots of other areas in addition to the one at hand.  It's bad enough when people outside the Church dismiss the Church's teaching on all unrelated areas because of the sex abuse scandal, now we have people within the Church doing the same thing?  The Church has expressed remorse on many occasions, and I would like to know exactly why you feel that the Church is currently victimizing the victims?  This article is not saying anything derogatory about the victims;  it's pointing out that the motivations behind the lawsuits is often greed (not by the victims, by the lawyers).  You are missing my point about the Protestants:  it's not that I'm concerned about them "cleaning up their own mess", it's that I think it's very unfair that the Catholic Church has been completely demonized and has had it's credibility eliminated by a media and a society that has judged an entire Church on the actions of a small minority, actions which are ignored in other denominations despite the fact that they occur at comparable rates.  These lawsuits have nothing to do with the fact that the Church considers the use of birth control to be a sin. Please!

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Yes Jesus loves sinners.  but not sin.  He always encourages the sinner to reconcile themselves to God.  And so does the church.

     

    The greatest loss is the loss of souls.  Ultimately we need to help save souls.  All else is a far secondary concern.

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    why do y'all keep posting these paragraphs, it makes it so's we folks at the bottom never get our comments seen

    anyways, this is a sad example of how our leagal system works today.

  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    stupid law system. (only one line comment on this whole page) =)

Leave a Reply