Catholic Exchange

Our Own Worst Enemies

If I had told you 10, even five years ago, that by the year 2009 Catholics would hold major positions of power in national government and significantly influence the political and cultural climate of the United States, what would your response have been?

Most faithful Catholics, after overcoming the shock of the suggestion, would have applauded such a prophecy. They would have envisioned a nation functioning in accord with God’s commandments, respecting the dignity of each human life, and standing as a beacon of hope to the rest of the world.

And they would have been wrong, wrong, wrong.

We now have people who call themselves Catholics in unprecedented positions of authority in government, and it’s the worst thing that could have happened to us. In the showdown of the political and cultural war that is rapidly escalating since January’s presidential inauguration, these baptized Catholics have been our worst enemies. They blaspheme, they cause public scandal, and they flagrantly defy Church doctrine while insisting they are “good, practicing Catholics.” With Holy Communion on their tongues, they support unrestricted abortion on demand legislation, homosexual rights agendas, irresponsible fiscal policies, and social service initiatives designed to increase public dependence upon government-run programs.

What’s scandalous about these leading Catholics is that, despite rejecting Church doctrine, they refuse to reject the Church Herself. They insist that they are Catholics “in good conscience,” whatever that phrase has come to mean. They revel in media coverage of their spiritual sincerity and seek to enlighten the rest of us that we, too, can pick and choose our beliefs regardless of the Magisterium. They refuse to leave the Church. Instead, they seem content with remaining a thorn in Her holy side.

And that’s the place where ignorance crosses the line into the diabolical. No matter how unformed, how poorly catechized these elected officials are in their Catholic faith, they must be held responsible for the intrinsically evil agendas they are promoting in our nation. Their positions of power underscore the seriousness of their sins as they jeopardize their own souls and the souls of countless others who are led by their example and word into heresy and mortal sin.

Why do Catholics in the U.S. put up with this scandal? One answer is that most Catholics don’t know what is right or wrong, particularly in the arena of morality, and specifically on the subject of sexual sins. If you consider that most people who have been baptized into the Catholic Church are contracepting, divorcing, and don’t know what the inside of a confessional looks like, it’s easy to understand how they can be numb to scandalous actions and comments by Catholic lawmakers.

Another answer is confusion about the definition of conscience. Catholics don’t (or shouldn’t) form their consciences according to political polls, national trends, or personal preference. Our consciences are formed by instruction based on Holy Scripture and 2,000 years of Church tradition, dating to when Christ walked the earth and taught the first apostles. If you are going to allow a public figure to inform your conscience, please forget Nancy Pelosi and read St. Augustine, who was just as much a public figure and can tell you everything you need to know about sexual sin.

During the French Revolution, when many Catholics found it difficult to accept the unbridled bloodshed of the new regime, they were told it was simple to overcome their consciences: just go out, commit a mortal sin, and then receive Holy Eucharist. It was the surest way to kill a conscience then, and it still is.

Just as “conscience” has been contaminated by post-modern thinking, so has “compassion.” The things we Americans let slide in the name of compassion! Homosexual adoptions, late-term abortions, pornographic classroom materials, environmental hokum, unethical mortgage lending, you name it, we’ll swallow it as long as it’s coated with a sob story about how someone isn’t being treated “fairly.” We’d rather be called foolish than prejudiced, and we’d rather condone serious sin than be considered prudes.

Approximately one-quarter of the 111th Congress is Catholic, a number slowly rising in recent decades, according to the Catholic News Service. However, an ever-growing number of Congressional Catholics are Democrats who use their legislative clout to defend their party’s anti-Catholic agenda on issues of life, marriage, finances, taxes, government regulation and more.

The likes of Catholics such as Speaker of the House Pelosi, Vice President Joe Biden, soon-to-be-confirmed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and other cabinet and Congressional members will continue to erode opportunities for a true Catholic voice to be heard in the national arena. Their presence undermines Gospel values and the clear role of Catholics in today’s confused world.

What should our response be to our own worst enemies? We pray for their conversions, and the salvation of their souls. We also look to St. Paul, who reminds us “…that to (those who) love God, all things work together unto good…” (Romans 8:28). For every Joe Biden, there is a zealous young man studying for the priesthood. For every Nancy Pelosi, there is a mother teaching the undiluted faith to her children. For every public official who is staining the Bride of Christ with their lies and dissent, there is a parish community immersed in the sacraments, which bring life and light to our consciences and empower us, despite our imperfections, to be faithful followers of Christ in and out of season.

The very presence of unfaithful Catholics on the national scene, and their perverted representation of the True Faith, is assisting in a renewal of Catholic expression, thought, and learning within parishes, schools, convents, seminaries, and most importantly, in homes. It is a movement that John Paul II prophesied would be a new springtime for the Catholic Church, and it is happening now. The inspiration is from the Holy Spirit, but much of the fuel for the fire, so to speak, is provided by the enemy within as they continually prick our determination to defend the Church of Christ.

Men and women of orthodox Roman Catholic faith are entering the ranks of law, education, mass communications, and yes, even politics. We are already seeing young priests and religious changing the course of the Church in America, as well as the thousands of young families who innately flock to them. In another generation, the numbers will multiply and the groundswell will continue to gain power.

Although the secular world may laugh at the thought of seemingly unpowerful people influencing the course of American politics and culture, they are wrong. They fail to see the eternal irony of God, Who takes the lowly and raises them up; Who takes the weak and makes them strong; and Who chooses to use the small to accomplish the greatest things.

So our own worst enemies will, in God’s design, serve a purpose after all.

Comments

11 responses to “Our Own Worst Enemies”

  1. SeanReynoldsNZ Avatar
    SeanReynoldsNZ

    So where is the leadership from the Bishops on this? Now, if ever, is a time for decisive leadership from the Church as a unified whole.

    But more to the point, especially with Holy Week beginning, is a time for personal conversion. The hard truth that needs to be swallowed is that the people in power in the United States are there because the people of the United States put them there. It was the same issue that we had in New Zealand with nine years of hard Labour under Helen Clark. (Incidentally she has now appointed to head the United Nations Development Programme. I think Bill Clinton is less pro-abortion than her).

    But you must keep up the fight for life and everything else. What I have noticed from living in New Zealand, and now living in Australia is that the life issues are not fought at all here: The culture is truly one of the culture of death down under.

  2. purnt Avatar
    purnt

    This is a thought-provoking piece. Though some of us priests are not so “young”–I’m 42, a late vocation, and a survivor of the relativist catechesis of the 80’s–those of us in the “middle-aged” portion of the presbyterate have experienced the politically-correct, touchy-feely sham that passed for Catholicism for decades after Vatican II and are well-positioned to dismantle it with a loving, but clear presentation of the truth of Jesus Christ and his Church.

    God bless you,

    Fr. John

  3. christymomof3 Avatar
    christymomof3

    Where are the bishops? Thank God, they are also in the springtime. I am encouraged by the clear words from so many just before the election (too little, too late, but better than nothing), and several have spoken out about the ND graduation scandal. Now we have the Bishops Kevin in Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas, together spring-cleaning their houses, promoting the Gospel, and supporting the Pro-Life Committee in ways unimaginable just a couple of years ago! Praise God!

  4. magalabastro Avatar
    magalabastro

    I saw the comment from Fr. John about Vatican II.

    Did Fr. John imply that Vatican II is wrong? Is the issue Vatican II itself or the application of the learnings from Vatican II– and this mis-application is the one that needs to be dismantled? Isn’t this the heart of the SSPX ex-communication?

    I am curious to know what the stand is of the CE editors about this?

    I am a bit concerned about saying that Vatican II is wrong vs. saying it was not properly applied by the Church. Doesn’t infallibility apply to conciliar teachings?

    Please help. Thanks!
    –Michael

  5. Mary Kochan Avatar
    Mary Kochan

    Are you talking about the comment about a touchy-feely sham? That is not a comment about V II.

    The position of CE should be very clear to anyone who has been reading this site for any length of time. Mark Shea especially has written about it a lot. Are you new around here?

  6. fwtagge Avatar
    fwtagge

    I don’t think Fr. John is implying that Vatican II is wrong — I think he is stating that the application / interpretation of VII has been poor. I believe what he wants to dismantle is the poor teaching and application of VII, and the lack of true and serious teaching and spiritual formation most of us experienced during the 70’s and 80’s.

    I fully agree with Fr. John. As a 50-something year old layman, I grew up with the appalling lack of good catechesis in the 60’s forward. Far too many priests are still delivering “feel good” sermons, instead of solid teaching. Many of us are starving for good teaching! Most of the few really good homilists I’ve heard recently have been young priests, ordained in the past 4 – 6 years and many of these young “on fire” priests are being moved into teaching positions at seminaries. This is needed to raise up another generation of faithful priests, but is leaving many of us in the pews still hungry.

    I pray for priests like Fr. John who are ready to teach us what we need to hear, to give us solid food, and stop promoting the “feel good” church. We need more like him!

  7. Arkanabar Ilarsadin Avatar

    As far as the actual reforms instituted by the II Vatican council, most of the CE community is broadly supportive. However, there are a myriad of “reforms,” particularly in the liturgy, which are excused by invoking the II Vatican council, even though they are contrary to what the documents actually say. Particularly egregious (though satirical) examples can be found here: http://spiritofvatican2.blogspot.com/

  8. jackster Avatar

    Let them be anathema.

  9. timetochange8 Avatar
    timetochange8

    Why do you continue to persecute Catholics who just happen to have been born with a same-sex attraction? You reference “homosexual rights agendas” and “homosexual adoption” as though they are great evils. While I strongly agree with Catholic teachings on abortion, the Church is flat-out wrong with its discrimination against those who are same-sex oriented. It would be far more “Christ-like” for you and other “devout” Catholics to support same-sex marriage. Stop for a moment and think; don’t just accept the Vatican position that homosexuals are “disordered.” How I hope and pray one of your children happens to have been born gay.

  10. wgsullivan Avatar
    wgsullivan

    We must remember that Christ and His Church are one. If the Church says acting out on homosexual temptations is gravely wrong, Christ says so too.
    Abortion and the sterile acts of homosexuality share the emptiness of no possibility of life.
    For the sake of souls does the Church take the real position of love.

  11. Lucky Mom of 7 Avatar
    Lucky Mom of 7

    timetochange,

    I regret that your feelings of persecution. Have you read anything about John Paul II’s Theology of the Body? I think it would help you understand the Church’s position from the correct perspective. Filtered through a presupposition of persecution, I can see why the Church’s position seems unjust. I think TOB would help you understand the Church’s unfailing fidelity to the dignity of human person. That’s what motivates the Church’s position, friend.

    May the peace of Christ be yours.

    Lucky

Leave a Reply