Catholic Exchange

Judge Orders Man to Divulge Religious Beliefs in “Homophobia” Case

A New York state judge has ordered a businessman to state his religious beliefs about homosexuality in a case brought forward by the man's former employee.

Plaintiff John Fairchild alleges that Ted Doudak, a Christian and the president of Riva Jewelry, terminated his employment without reason after discovering that both Doudak and his daughter were homosexual.

In Fairchild's complaint, the former employee of Riva Jewelry accuses Doudak of a "homophobia," proved by a history of "discriminatory" behavior, including expressing his "disgust" with homosexuals, quoting Bible verses that say homosexuals will be condemned to hell, and directing Fairchild to deal with homosexual representatives at Tiffany's since Doudak himself preferred not to.

Doudak terminated Fairchild's employment for "poor work performance" one day after discovering a lesbian magazine on his employee's desk; upon being asked about the magazine Fairchild had explained to Doudak that both he and his daughter were homosexuals.

During the ensuing court case, which is not yet resolved, Fairchild requested that Doudak answer three questions for the court, including whether he believes "homosexuality is a sin against God," whether "gays and lesbians are doomed to eternal damnation," and whether "Doudak regards homosexuals as 'repulsive'."

"A lot of discrimination against homosexuals has a religious motivation," said William Kaiser, Fairchild's attorney, according to the Daily News. "People who hold those views have to know they can't act on them with regard to employment."

The president of Riva Jewelry, however, refused to answer the questions, arguing that his privacy of religious belief is constitutionally protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Doudak also argued, according to court records, that by asking the preceding questions, Fairchild "seeks to equate religious membership in a particular religion as de facto proof of discriminatory animus by inquiring into the basic tenets (i.e., what constitutes sin) of Mr. Doudak's religion."

"You're attacking perceived religious affiliation in an attempt to make a claim," Todd Krakower, Doudak's attorney, told the Daily News. "He's [plaintiff] trying to prove a case through religious affiliation, and that's improper."

The judge that is presiding over the discovery stage of the case, however, has ruled that Doudak must divulge his religious beliefs.

"When it appears that one's religion is relied upon to form a basis of discrimination against a person who is a member of a protected class, to wit: homosexuals," then an individual may be compelled to divulge their religious beliefs, wrote Judge Carol Robinson Edmead in her decision.

Currently New York has in place anti-discrimination laws that explicitly name "sexual orientation" as one of the protected categories for discrimination.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Perhaps the best way to deal with this situation is for employers to demand the right to say that,"well,we won't decide on your suitability for employment,based on your sexuality.However,you must respect our

     belief that the gay lifestyle is perverted and we don't want it paraded around the workplace as if it is normal".

    I used to work in British Government Departments that had their unwritten rules about religious and political arguments in the workplace.We should have a similar unwritten law about gay arguments

    and promotions in the workplace.That sounds a great idea till i remember

    that the same Government Dept.bosses,when it suited,could leak like one of these sieves one might use in the garden to separate soil from any large stones.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Regardless of their disordered desires, homosexuals have as much of God's love and the same route to His salvation as anyone. The proper response to the plaintiff's questions, according to Catholic doctrine, are these:

    1. Homosexuality is not a sin against God; homosexual acts are.

    2. Gays and lesbians are no more doomed to eternal damnation than any other sinner.

    3. God requires the same love be shown to all, no matter if I regard them as repulsive, why I may regard them as repulsive, or how repulsive I may regard them as being.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    <i>"Doudak terminated Fairchild's employment for "poor work performance" one day after discovering a lesbian magazine on his employee's desk; upon being asked about the magazine Fairchild had explained to Doudak that both he and his daughter were homosexuals."</i>

    I wish Mr. Doudak had let the incident pass for 24 hours, and then the next day had called a staff meeting and announced, "Just a heads' up for everybody: Sexually explicit newspapers, magazines, and other material – whether of a heterosexual or homosexual nature – are not be brought into this workplace. This is to be a non-hostile work environment for everybody." Then next time Fairchild has gay material lying around on his desk, if Mr. Doudak would say, "John, as you will remember from the staff meeting that everyone attended, I'm going to have to ask you to put that item away in your briefcase, and report to my office where you will be asked to read and sign a copy of the company policy about sexually explicit material in this workplace."

    Put the onus on the offender!

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Marion,

         I think you're right.  The way he handled the situation unfortunately does give the other side a lot of ammunition.  It is important to distinguish between disapproval of the behavior vs the person himself. 

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Kent C. Bois

    Suggestions on how Doudak should have handled situation are OK but isn't the bigger picture that Christianity is being put on trial? Christianity and christian beliefs are being qustioned in our courts more and more frequently and with far reaching consequences! Where will it end? When Christianity becomes so private as to disapear completely from the public arena? Will any kind of christian expression become outlawed because it may 'offend' someone?

Leave a Reply