Catholic Exchange

Hernándo Cortés and Our Lady

Hernando Cortés, Spanish conquistador, explorer and Catholic. The latter title is not one that comes readily to mind in today's politically correct atmosphere. Modern historians often portray him as a ruthless brute, annihilating the native people and plundering their treasures.

In reality, Cortés was a great soldier of the Church with a deep devotion to Mary. He landed on the shores of Mexico on Good Friday, April 22, 1519. Many schoolbook historians broad brush the past and attribute Cortés and his men with motives of greed for gold and glory. However, that view fails to reveal what this deeply religious soldier and leader viewed as his true mission upon landing on the shores of what then was truly an evil empire.

Because so much of the written history we rely on today is from an Anglo-Protestant perspective, Spain's role in bringing the Christian faith to the new world is minimized by many early historians. It is important to remember the deep essence of purpose Cortés and many of his soldiers held. Cortés and his men never entered into a march or a major battle without having their confessions heard and Mass said. Cortés carried blessed medals of both St. James the Apostle and Mary close to his heart. Many of the men also carried rosary beads with them. Little did Cortés or his men realize, when they landed in 1519, what large a role Mary would play in birthing a New Spain.

The Landing

When Cortés and his soldiers first encountered the indigenous people of Mexico, some of the first Aztecs thought Cortés was the god, Quetzalcoatl. In ancient Mayan-Aztec mythology, Quetzalcoatl, ironically, was light-skinned with light-hair. Legend held that he had left their lands centuries before to the east but promised to return one day to reclaim his throne and bring back the knowledge of the "one true God" to his people. Cortés never claimed to be Quetzalcoatl but this legend held back the Aztec Emperor Montezuma II from sending warriors and immediately wiping out Cortés and his soldiers when they landed in 1519.

 Upon landing, Cortés planted a cross on the eastern shores of what is now Vera Cruz (English translation: True Cross), Mexico. He had Father Olmedo say Mass for his men on the sandy shores. Then a delegation from Montezuma (who was deeply troubled that Cortés/Quetzalcoatl had come on ships described by his spies as "floating islands") welcomed him, gave him presents of silver and gold and promptly asked him to leave immediately. In the banquet prepared for Cortés and the soldiers on board his "floating islands", the Aztecs sprinkled dried human blood on the food, as a test for Cortés. For if he were indeed Quetzalcoatl, perhaps he would be pleased to taste human blood again. Cortés and his men reacted with utter disgust, spit the food from their mouths and ordered Montezuma's envoys off their ships.

The sprinkling of dried human blood was nothing compared to the horrors of what lie ahead over the next two years. The Aztecs practiced human sacrifice on a scale unimaginable to the Spanish. No one will ever know exactly how many men, women and even children were sacrificed across the lands ruled by the Aztecs and the other Mayan-tribes for centuries before that. The law of the Aztecs required a thousand to their god Huitzilopochtli, the god of death, sun and war, in every temple every year. Historians tell us there were 371 temples when Cortés arrived. There were other ritual sacrifices as well to other gods. One Mexican historian estimated that one out of five children were sacrificed. Sometimes entire tribes were exterminated by sacrifice.

Month after month, year after year, in temple after temple, sacrificial victims came down the long roads leading to the pyramids, climbed the steep steps to the top of the platforms, and were bent backwards over convex slabs of stones. An immense knife with a blade of midnight black volcanic glass rose and fell, gutting the victim open. His or her heart was torn out while still beating and held up for all to see, while the ravaged body was kicked over the edge of the temple where it bounced down the steps a hundred feet below. The Aztecs priests who performed these sacrifices then consumed the blood that was collected, especially enjoying the consumption of the victim's heart. Other body parts were saved for other rituals, the dried blood saved to garnish at special ceremonial meal times. It was a culture of blood, death and gore on a scale that was unimaginable to the Spaniards.

The Mission

Cortés and his men quickly realized the extent of the Satanic society they were up against. They knew their primary mission was to stop the evil practice of human sacrifice and bring souls into the Church. The gold and riches for the Spanish crown was secondary. Some of the soldiers were there for treasure to be sure. But throughout the next two years, it would not be gold or silver that would win the battles against the 25 million indigenous people that Montezuma ruled over. These Spanish soldiers knew that the true treasure to help them survive the battles to come would be the treasures of the Church: Jesus, Mary and the sacraments. Gold and silver was of little value in battle. When fighting for one's life, prayer was key.

Friar Diego de Landa writes in his book Yucatan, Before and After the Conquest in 1566, translated by William Gates: "(Cortés) preached to them the vanity of idols, and persuaded them to adore the cross; this he placed in their temples with an image of Our Lady…"

In fact when Cortés finally did reach Montezuma's capitol city of Tenochtitlan (today Mexico City), he boldly ordered that the top of one of the main human sacrificial pyramids be stripped of its evil idols, the human-blood stained walls be cleansed and that an image of Virgin Mary and a cross be erected in its place. Everywhere Cortés went, Mary and the cross were their companions. The soldiers wore the emblem of the cross on their steel helmets, on their breastplates and carried it on their banners. Mary was carried close to their hearts in medallions and by the recitations of rosaries. And when the Aztecs did capture Spanish soldiers throughout the campaign and drag them away, Cortés and his men knew they might become victims of the very practice they were determined to stop.

As the (Protestant) American historian William writes in his book, History of the Conquest of Mexico, originally published in 1843:

As the long file of (Aztec) priests reached the flat summit of the pyramid, the Spaniards saw the figures of several men stripped to their waists, some of whom, by the whiteness of their skin they recognized their own countrymen. They were going to be victims of sacrifice…what sensations the stupefied Spaniard must have gazing on this horrid spectacle, so near they could almost recognize the persons of their unfortunate friends, see the struggles and writhing of their bodies, their screams of agony.

Mary's Intervention

Human sacrifice as practiced by the Aztecs when Cortés landed, was on a scale we cannot imagine. Or can we? In Aztec society, in Mayan society before that and other American-indigenous societies some of the brightest, most educated, well-trained and respected leaders were standing atop those pyramids in Aztec-Mayan society carrying out the bloody deed of human sacrifice to satisfy the hunger of their evil gods. Today some of our brightest, best educated and well-trained and respected leaders have convinced people in our society that it is a basic human right to sacrifice an innocent child in a Mother's womb. And instead of throwing that baby down the steps of a pyramid for everyone to see, it is quietly taken out with the trash. Satan still desires death. Our society today has passed laws to give him want he wants; convincing many that slaughtering their most innocent citizens in their mother's wombs is a basic human right.

Cortés conquered Aztec society in a bloody conflict. He immediately sought peace afterwards, opening the doors for his Spanish missionaries to convert the millions to the Catholic faith. Language and cultural barriers threatened the peace almost immediately after the battles ended. It took Mary's sudden appearance to St. Juan Diego and her self-portrait left on Diego's tilma (cloak) to convert people en-masse to the Church. Nine million Aztecs asked to be baptized by 1540 and tens of millions more were added within twenty years.

An incredible list of miracles, cures and interventions are attributed to Mary because of this image. Yearly, an estimated 20 million visit her Basilica, making her Mexico City home the most popular Marian shrine in the world, and the most visited Catholic Church in the world next to the Vatican. In all, twenty-five popes have officially honored Our Lady of Guadalupe. His Holiness, the late John Paul II, visited her sanctuary four times: on his first apostolic trip outside Rome as pope in 1979, and again in 1990, 1999 and 2002.

If we want the evil of abortion to end, let us be reminded of how a great devotion to our Blessed Mother has brought down evil societies, transformed peoples' hearts and led nations back to the Church. We always find in Mary the perfect mediator of God's grace to mankind. Nearly 500 years ago, she was there for Hernando Cortés, his soldiers and St. Juan Diego and his people. Surely Our Blessed Mother will help us again if we call upon her intercession.

Cortés died in Spain, 460 years ago on December 2, 1547 at the age of 62 on his way back to Mexico. The historian Bernal Diaz tells us he was still wearing medallions of St. James the Apostle and the Blessed Mother when he passed onto eternity.

Comments

28 responses to “Hernándo Cortés and Our Lady”

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I might note that Cortes was stripped of his rank and sent back to Spain because he was trying to defend the Indians from land-grabbing noblemen who wanted to profit by the total enslavement of the local population.

    The consecration of the main Aztec Temple in Tenochtitlan in 1487 (Juan Diego was a boy at the time) may have taken the lives of at least 20,000 over a period of four days (estimates range to over 80,000). The Aztecs made lousy neighbors, since most of their victims were not Aztecs. It is no small wonder, then, that the native tribes supported the Conquestators in overthrowing the Aztecs.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Great article. 

    Warren Carroll's book on this subject is exceptional for those who might want to read more.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Toward the end of this article, you say, "We always find in Mary the perfect mediator between mankind and God." Surely this is not intended. I hope you "mis-spoke". Did you mean to say "intercesor" and not mediator? There is only ONE mediator between God and man, the man Jesus Christ"

    Other than this, I find this article to be an inspiring read. Satan will be defeated and Mary will be the one God will use to "crush his head under her feet"!

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Decent article, even if a little biased. Of course, the main prism of history today is not seen through an Anglo/Protestant lens. When that was the case in the early 20th century through the end of World War Two, Cortes wasn't demonized like he is by today's progressive media.

    The truth is much as the article states, the Spanish vanquished a demonic society being used for evil purposes. It's great to see that story told again. Mary was a great inspiration for them (and should be for us), and Seagull makes a stirling point that Jesus Christ is her Saviour as well. She should never take the place of Christ as our mediator. We would do well to remember Luke 11:27-28 27 It happened that as he was speaking, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said, 'Blessed the womb that bore you and the breasts that fed you!' 28 But he replied, 'More blessed still are those who hear the word of God and keep it!'   

    I don't understand why Catholics are so scared to to tell the truth. Some will smear Protestants at every angle, but are basically gutless when it comes to pointing out that every major media company is owned by Jews. Someone please ask progressive Murray Rothstein (Sumner Redstone) head of CBS Viacom, to stop pushing homosexuality on our kids via MTV. That is a terrible lifestyle fraught with disease and misery for anyone trapped in it's evil clutches. He's literally a "pusher" of death on these kids. Period. 

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    This article highlights how education has both changed and been politicized. I was taught all this, the human sacrifce of the Aztecs and the motivations of Cortez, when I was in (public) elementary school in the 1960's.

    Our school had a Spanish teacher who came to all classrooms, and who shared the history and culture of Latin America with us. She was wonderful. So even though I raised with the typical American attitudes against Catholicism, I was aware of how the (Catholic) Spanish Conquistadors had halted these atrocities.

    Fast forward to a couple of years ago. I was teaching in a homeschool co-op, and I had to try to dispell the notion that even these Catholic homeschoolers had absorbed: that Columbus came to the New World seeking gold. I tried and tried to show them the illogic of Columbus "knowing" there would be gold before he ever arrived, let alone that he'd "know" he'd be discovering new land. I'm not sure I ever got through.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mankind will not have peace until it turns with trust to God's Mercy. Kent C. Bois

     

    I just posted this over at Digg. It should get some lively attention. Just another way to propagate the Culture of Life.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I'm no apologist for the horrors of the Aztec empire, but I don't think that we should forget that Cortes, deeply religious though he was, took advantage of his native interpreter, and made her his mistress, committing the sin of adultery against God, and his wife back home. (To be fair, he did acknowledge and care for the son she bore him, and he broke off the relationship when his wife arrived from Spain. )

    The Aztec record is horrendous enough to condemn their society without whitewashing the failings of the Conquistadors.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Interesting that y'all wrote this article. After reading about Mel Gibson's film "Apocalypto" and the Mayan culture in National Geographic, I recalled the quote used in the teaser for Gibson's film: "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it is destroyed from within." (W. Durant). I realized that, as disturbed as we are by the thought of hideous human sacrifice, we have no place criticizing their culture. What's the difference between child sacrifice there and abortion here? We sacrifice our own children in this civilized country! The doctors at the clinics are the high priests, and the mothers are giving consent to CHILD SACRIFICE. Don't we love our children? And, as a teenager, I am disturbed at the service of society's own pagan gods: drugs, alcohol, premarital sex, false religions. I'm not saying that we will fall as a country anytime in the near future, but we certainly aren't going in a good direction if we keep killing our unborn children and abusing alcohol, drugs, and one another. It's inspired me to pray the Rosary more.

    I think it is fascinating to read about other cultures and compare them to our own, if possible. In this case, it is.

    God bless, and thanks for reading!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    seagull35fn,

    Check the Catechism of the Catholic Church (I use the 2nd. Ed of the Libreria Editrice Vaticana) in Part One, Chapter Three, under Article 9 [969] "…Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix." Mediatrix is the feminine form of Mediator.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have fixed the language of the article regrding Mary being a mediator in order to avoid confusion. Christ is the mediator — the only mediator — of the New Covenant.  No one comes to the Father except through Him.  But when the Father sent the Son, the Father sent Him through Mary.  Christ is the way we get to the Father; Mary is the way the Father sends the Son to us.

    Advent blessings to all,

    Mary Kochan, Senior Editor, Catholic Exchange

    (Thanks to the above poster for the Catechism quote.)

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Zephyr,

    Luke 11:27-28 27 It happened that as he was speaking, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said, 'Blessed the womb that bore you and the breasts that fed you!' 28 But he replied, 'More blessed still are those who hear the word of God and keep it!'

    We *do* believe this; it's part of the readings for one of the Marian feasts — because Mary heard the word of God and always kept it. 

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    A man within his historical context. Not to be glorified or condoned but at the same time not to be ignored for the very important part he did play in history. Ultimately it was Divine intervention that turned the tide which may say somthing to us in our time.

     

    Mankind will not have peace until it turns with trust to God's Mercy. Kent C. Bois

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks for the article.  I have been to Mexico nine times over the past twelve years and I have spent some time studying the 'Conquest.'  I have celebrated the Mass at the Basilica of OLG and at Tepeyac numerous times and I have also been to Vera Cruz where Cortés landed.  It is true that Cortés had a couple of priests with him on his journey and that there was a great deal of devotion amoung the troops.  I agree with the comment that the evil of human sacrifice had to be stopped.  Righteous people try to stop injustices.  It wasn't pretty, however.  There was a great amount of greed and there were massacres, as there have been in many wars throughout human history.  I think that a comparison of the Aztec human sacrifices to the abortions of today makes our culture appear lower.  The Aztec religion believed that the sun needed human hearts to continue to burn.  Their sacrifices were in support of this false religious belief.  It was only after the sacrifices were foricbly stopped that they realized that the sun didn't need those hearts to provide sunshine.  Many, not all, of those having abortions today are not trying to keep the sun burning, but are simply eliminating lives because it is 'inconvenient.'  Some are for purely selfish / self-centered reasons. 

    For those interested in reading what I think are fair and scholarly accounts of the conquest of Mexico, I would recommend:   Conquest:  Cortes, Montezuma and the Fall of Old Mexico by Hugh Thomas and Conquistadors by Michael Woods (A PBS sponsored Documentary and Companion Book)

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mediatrix is a proper title for Mary, but we should keep in mind that making Latin nouns masculine (e.g. medaitor –> mediatrix) often provides subtle changes to meaning. Another proper title for Mary is Genetrix (Ora pro nobis, Sancta Dei Genetrix, from both the Angelus and the Rosary). Genetrix comes from the same Latin verb, generare, meaning to beget or bring to life. We see this same verb take on a different noun form in the Latin Creed:

    …Et in unum Dominum, Iesum Christum, filium Dei unigenitum

    In this case the unigenitum is Jesus, literally, the only begotten Son. Just as significantly, the genitor, or begetter, is God the Father. And so, genitor (masculine) means begetter or father while genetrix (feminine) has an equivalent meaning in reference to a woman: the one who brings forth, which is to say, mother. These subtleties of semantic expression are often lost in English texts because English rarely uses word inflections (e.g. genitor for father and genetrix for mother) to distinguish such shades of meaning. This is one reason why it can be perilous to draw some conclusions from an English translation of Scripture — unless one is aware of the linguistic and cultural norms of the the society in which the Scripture was written (the phrase, James, brother of Jesus, where brother means cousin or other relative, comes directly to mind here).

    But back to Mediatrix, a proper title for the Blessed Mother. Mediatrix is certainly the feminine form of Mediator, but Mediatrix does not merely take on the same meaning as Mediator when applied to a woman. Rather, it takes on a specific meaning that is proper for the Mother but distinct from the meaning of the masculine term Mediator, properly applied to the Son. Frankly, my Latin fails me in understanding this subtle difference, but no matter. We can simply turn to John Paul, writing in Redemptoris Mater:

    At Cana in Galilee there is shown only one concrete aspect of human need, apparently a small one and of little importance ("They have no wine"). But it has a symbolic value: this coming to the aid of human needs means, at the same time, bringing those needs within the radius of Christ's messianic mission and salvific power. Thus there is a mediation: Mary places herself between her Son and mankind in the reality of their wants, needs and sufferings. She puts herself "in the middle," that is to say she acts as a mediatrix not as an outsider, but in her position as mother. She knows that as such she can point out to her son the needs of mankind, and in fact, she "has the right" to do so. Her mediation is thus in the nature of intercession: Mary "intercedes" for mankind. And that is not all. As a mother she also wishes the messianic power of her Son to be manifested, that salvific power of his which is meant to help man in his misfortunes, to free him from the evil which in various forms and degrees weighs heavily upon his life (Number 21, emphasis mine).

    "She acts as a mediatrix not as an outsider, but in her position as mother." Herein lies the difference. Mary is not the Son but she is the Mother — our Mother as well as His. And this state of being (i.e. universal Motherhood) is what defines her role as Mediatrix.

    Masculine and feminine inflections in language are not merely syntactic devices, put in place to avoid embarrassing each other in speech or writing. Rather, these syntactic devices reflect deeper Truths about who we are as persons and as aggregations of persons – that is to say as peoples or cultures. These meanings can only be understood properly if we do not obscure them, either by explaining away masculine and feminine linguistic distinctions on a superficial level or by hiding the explicit masculinity and femininity in our sacred texts by replacing it with neuter language.

    If we are to change the text, I would change "We always find in Mary the perfect mediator of God's grace to mankind" to "We always find in Mary the perfect mediatrix of God's grace to mankind," in order to emphasize Mary's proper role.

  15. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    There may be a Cortes City somewhere in Mexico but I don’t know of it. There is however Vera Cruz, and up our way – Santa Fe, Los Angeles and not Los Conquistadores.The point is that the mission of these conquerors was primarily a spiritual one. Compare that to New York, Pennsylvania and Charleston. It is easy from our comfortable vantage point to impugn the motives of these explorers. Whatever motive we would assign to these brave men would be correct. Along with the faithful ones came greedy and vain ones also. That’s always the mix in any dangerous venture. The gentlemen, governors and bishops came when the dirty grunt work of making roads was done. The task of converting the likes of the blood thirsty Aztecs could not have been accomplished by the gentile. The greatest conversion in history is attributed to Our Lady. Where would these converts have gone if the groundwork of the faith communities was not laid by those conquistadores?

    The ripping out of beating hearts for religious reasons is not any less evil than doing it for monetary and convenience reasons. The elimination of the former required a heavy hand and a spiritual crusade. Those who think the latter will fade into history with only prayers and demonstrations are deluding themselves. All gods required sacrifice. Our God also wants us to put something tangible on the line or the conversion will not be accomplished.

     

  16. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks for the comments.  I hope everyone understand that when we wrote the article about Mary's role we were talking about her as an intercessor.  Thank you for the contributions on this point.  Further let us not lose sight of the big picture of Mary or what we can learn from history.  Prayer is the most powerful weapon the world has ever seen.  When St. Peter and others wanted to use the sword, Jesus rebuked him.  If we use prayer as weapon, there is no doubt in my mind we can change the world.  Remember if we even have faith the size of a mustard seed what we could do?  We live in a different world today than the Catholic Spaniards did.  Our sacrifices must therefore be not of their world, but of our time and place.  The message we continually hear from the Saints and from Mary is to love one another, to pray, to fast and to sacrifice.  That is not the message we hear from our culture is it?  That is our challenge, to be counter-cultural and to listen with our hearts and souls to what Our Lord and His Mother are telling us.  Just as Cortes changed a culture then, I believe with the spiritual tools and weapons we have been given by God, we can change our world too.  Thanks for reading our article and have a wonderful, prayerful Advent!

  17. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    To the Armstrongs: Thanks for this article, and for the message you are communicating through it.  I wholeheartedly agree that the weapons of our day are prayer, fasting, and personal sacrifice.

    To goral: Not all the explorers who settled the east coast were "non-spiritual", dear.  Otherwise, how to account for "Maryland" and "Virginia" and "Philadelphia"!  (There are others, but not as well known.)

  18. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Re: Cooky642‘s post:

    "Not all the explorers who settled the east coast were “non-spiritual”, dear. Otherwise, how to account for “Maryland” and “Virginia” and “Philadelphia”! (There are others, but not as well known.)"

    "Virginia," I thought was selected with an eye towards buttering up the Queen of England. 

    In any case, generally the early explorers weren’t the ones who settled.  Exploration began very early with tentative incursions up bays and l;arge rivers looking for the Northwest Passage.  The settlers came later.  Mayland may be the exception to this, but wasn’t it settled by people who were fleeing religious persecution in England?  For a while wasn’t it the only colony with a Catholic proprietor?

    Regards,
    Old Sigma (Cradle Catholic [Latin rite] & generally inveterate amateur)
  19. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    True, pouliot.

    Virginia was not named for the Blessed Virgin, but after Queen Elizabeth I.

    Plus, Maryland was not named after our Blessed Mother either, but to honor King Charles’ wife Queen Henrietta Maria (Queen Mary).

    But God works in mysterious ways.  And the fact is the states called Virginia and Maryland are the two which surround our nation's capital.

     

  20. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Virginia was named for Elizabeth the "virgin queen."

  21. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Re: Cortez’s Forces

    Cortez marched inland, accompanied by Cempoalans, subjugated vassals of the Aztecs with their own motives.

    Before reaching Mexico City, his forces entered the republic of Tlaxcala which had successfully resisted the Aztecs.  The Tlaxcalans fought bravely but could not pierce the iron armor of the Spaniards.  They lost the first battle. 

    Bernal Diaz, a Spaniard who provides an account of these events, wrote, in part: " we dressed our wounds with the fat from a stout Indian whom we had killed and cut open, for we had no oil."

    One might be forgiven for wondering what Christian virtue was thereby exemplified. 

    At least the Aztecs believed the sacrifices were called for by their deity.

    Naturally we know the Spaniards didn’t sacrifice this man just to get dressing for their wounds.  After all, we have their word for it.

    The Tlaxacans had retreated and sent ambassadors to spy on the Spanish before they would have to fight again. 

    They were denounced to Cortez by his mistress and he ordered their hands to be cut off and sent them home.  I would think such benignity would tend to leave even the Pope speechless. 

    The perspective of the Aztecs towards Cortez was somewhat different than we have presented to us most often.  It comes from one of their own through the offices of a Spanish friar, fluent in the Nahuatl language. 

    (The Aztecs had blundered badly when word reached them of the gigantic canoes that had appeared from where the Sun rises.  They sent ambassadors bearing gifts to Cortez.  These objects were the finest in their realm, beaten gold, colorful, rare feathers and many other things.  Cortez however sneered at the gifts and chained the ambassadors, fired off a cannon to frighten them, plied them with wine and tried to provoke them to resist him.  (It seems he had tried hard to provoke them to violence.)  They had declined and eventually made good their escape.  These events had taken place before the march towards Mexcio City, which I have described above, began.  It is this encounter which led to the record of the Aztecs’ point of view.) 

    "Is this all?" he is reported to have said to the ambassadors.  "Is this your gift of welcome?  Is this how you greet people?"  They answered: "This is all, our lord.  This is what we have brought you." What followed was the mistreatment of them already noted. 

    Suffice it to say the Spanish record of this encounter runs quite differently.

    Oh yes, the Aztecs were oppressors.  They sacrificed many humans on their altars. 

    However, I fail to see where the Spanish had a divine mandate to commit atrocities in the name of Our Lord. 

    If the history of salvation teaches us anything, we ought to realize that God works continually despite the evil that humans introduce into the equation.  Mary’s appearance is an example of that sort of intervention undoubtedly willed by God.  An intervention that took place, many years later, in spite of the climate of the times, not as an endorsement of what the Spanish ahd done and were doing. 

    Cortez came for gold.  To deny this is to indulge in rank self-deception.  Oh, yes, he had friars with him but that was an expedient to secure the backing of the Spanish throne for his expedition.  According to the European doctrine of discovery, the first European authority to "discover" a hitherto unknown (to the Europeans) land, had the exclusive right to negotiate with the inhabitants of that land for trade privileges.  Cortez could not hold the benefit of this doctrine as a private individual.  He had to have a commission from the King, a recognized ruler in Europe.  For his part, the King would not grant the commission unless Cortez took the friars with him.  What motivated the King?  Perhaps the Queen.  In any case, Cortez wasn’t interested in bringing religion to the people he met beyond allowing the friars to travel with him.

    Cortez a Catholic??? Pulleeese. 

    One might be tempted to say, with the leader who was charged with apostasy by the Spaniards (he had been compelled to convert, and when they discovered that he continued to practice his own religion, they had brought him to book over it), «If you are the kind of people to be found in your "paradise" then I want to go to the other place.»

    Regards,
    Old Sigma (Cradle Catholic [Latin rite] & generally inveterate amateur)
  22. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    My thinking is along the line of pouliot's. Cooky, the Pilgrims certainly were spiritual, they just weren't of our ilk. A "papist" was a persona non grata on the East Coast with Maryland being the exception although Lutherville managed to squeeze in there even in Mary's land. Philadelphia is pretty generic. Lord Baltimore made sure his name went down in history. The explorers were a fascinating bunch.

  23. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    My response above was to pouliot's earlier response not the 8:15 post. My thinking is not along the line of this one. (I was too slow on the post)Everyone tries to bend history to their own liking. There is some truth to all of it. But the whole truth doesn't reside in any one particular view.

    Thanks PTR for the Maryland clarification. I forgot that one. What's to stop us from consecrating Virginia and Maryland to the Blessed Lady?

  24. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The United States has already been consecrated to Mary for over one hundred years.  Our national basilica is named after the Immaculate Conception. And she is active in her intercession. 

    Beyond the providential coincidence of the Virginia/Maryland location of our capital, consider this:

    The USA declared war and entered into WWII on December 8, the feast of the Immaculate Conception.

    The Japanese surrendered ending that war on August 15, the feast of the Assumption.

  25. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Cortes is, above all, an unpleasantly fleshy proof that Our Lord casts a wide net in his search for souls. The circumstances of his life were vastly different from those of our own time: he came along at the culmination of a 700-year long existential struggle in Spain. These 700 years of war are the very reason that Spanish military technology was so advanced. And Cortes seems to have been the consummate soldier, no doubt living up to the expectations of soldiers of the time. His own time, for instance, was but 100 years after that of St. Joan of Arc. And St. Joan was remarkable in that she did not simply massacre the soldiers of her vanquished enemies but let them escape home instead, to live in peace if possible. Cortes no doubt embraced wholly the ethic of a soldier living and dying in those terrible times.

    This note of understanding, as it were, should not be confused with blindness. We cringe in horror at the news reports out of modern Liberia (for example) where non-combatants have had their limbs hacked off by the soldiery. Such grotesque evil was engineered by the likes of Charles Taylor, and Cortes did much the same during his wars. If Mr. Taylor causes you to cringe, so should Cortes. But it would be too much to simply write off Cortes's career as the mere consequence of circumstance. Many did not choose the life chosen by Cortes. We cannot forget that Martin of Porres and Rose of Lima came on the scene at about the same time. Cortes's courageous contemporary, Bartolomé de las Casas, stood up before the Spanish crown to argue successfully that the indigenous of America had souls, were therefore human, and must therefore be treated as any other bearing the inherent dignity of a living image of God. Now, the good Friar Bartolomé's name has been sullied of late, pressed into the service of banal politics and even seen as a forebear of Liberation Theology. But this usurpation is not the good Friar's fault. The historical Cortes has been similarly usurped as symbolic of the problems with alleged Western hegemony. But the evil of Cortes cannot be presented honestly as a foil for evils of the pre-Hispanic indigenous peoples (or in contrast to their alleged good). (It is interesting that neither St. Martin nor St. Rose has been similarly usurped, but in each case, the saint's greatness is a direct consequence of his real-life humility, lived out under some of the most horrific social circumstances imaginable. Humility does not lend itself well to political causes, and so these two great saints remain largely unsullied.)

    Still, the article serves a useful purpose, I think. The historical Cortes was no mere killing machine, nor was religion instrumental to the mythologized "diabolical" purposes attributed to him. Religion was clearly part and parcel of who he was, and it no doubt served to soften the hardest edges of his martial exploits. Nevertheless, those edges remained harsh and merciless on many levels, and it is not too much to suggest that his terrible exploits created a situation where a genuine, sacramental miracle was required to bring sanity onto the scene — especially since that scene was despoiled of sanity long before Cortes arrived.

    The Blessed Mother provided that sanity with her miracle. We should be thankful and attentive to her wishes. It really doesn't need to be any more complicated than that.

  26. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Re: Hernándo Cortés and Our Lady

    "In reality, Cortés was a great soldier of the Church with a deep devotion to Mary. "

    I guess thie quoted statement, above all, grates intolerably.  Most especially the claim that he was a "great soldier of the Church."

    I know that in many of the communities of the "Native Americans" this statement would be the death-knell of any thought of following Catholicism. 

    As misguided as he may have been, it is not possible to challenge the claim that he was devoted to Our Lady, but it is easy to see how one would be sceptical about the claim’s validity at least at the time of his invasion of Mexico.  If he honestly was, maybe she heard his prayers and so had her attention drawn to the horrible results of his actions (but of course, enjoying the beatific vision, her attention didn’t need to be drawn anywhere).  Perhaps that is what led her to intervene, though much later.

    Regards,
    Old Sigma (Cradle Catholic [Latin rite] & generally inveterate amateur)
  27. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    May I add one more remark, here?  It seems to me that all those denigrating Cortes have one thing in common: they seem to be judging him and his actions according to the "lights" of modern understanding and theology.  I'm not defending what he did/was, so much as insisting that the brilliance of St. Martin or St. Rose (or, even, St. Joan) was the fact that they were so very different than the expectations of their time.  Should we excuse him for that?  I'm just saying that we need to take him in the context of his time and society.

  28. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Re: Cooky642‘s post:

    "It seems to me that all those denigrating Cortes have one thing in common: they seem to be judging him and his actions according to the “lights” of modern understanding and theology."

    Hmmm.  A point to consider, certainly.  However, there were near-contemporaneous condemnations of what the Spaniards were doing.  I’ll take Cortez in that context, but not in the revisionist way he is portrayed here.

    Regards,
    Old Sigma (Cradle Catholic [Latin rite] & generally inveterate amateur)

Leave a Reply