Catholic Exchange

Governor Schwarzenegger Says Marriage Could Be Eliminated in Future

In legal briefs submitted to the California Supreme Court, which is considering whether to license "same-sex marriages" next year, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown both stated that a future Legislature could abolish marriage and yank marriage rights from a married husband and wife. A group hoping to place a question on the 2008 ballot to defend traditional marriage suggests that the briefs are evidence of the urgent need for the ballot initiative.

In the governor's brief, filed by his team of lawyers, Schwarzenegger says, "The Administration submits that use of the words 'marry' and 'marriage' is not required by the California Constitution. Thus, the name of the legal relationship now known as 'marriage' could be changed."

In his brief, Brown says similarly, "…the words 'marry' and 'marriage' have no essential constitutional significance under the California Constitution. Thus, the Legislature could change the name of the legal relationship now known as "marriage" to some other name without any constitutional impediment."

In the briefs the Governor and Attorney General also suggest that marriage rights and marriage benefits for a husband and wife can be eliminated by the California Legislature.

Said Brown: "…except for this essential ability to choose and declare one's life partner in a reciprocal and binding contractual commitment of mutual support, any of the statutory rights and obligations that are afforded exclusively to married couples in California could be abrogated or eliminated by the Legislature or the electorate for any rational legislative purpose."

Schwarzenegger's brief states: "…except for the ability to choose and declare one's life partner in a reciprocal commitment of mutual support, any of the statutory rights and obligations that are afforded to married couples in California could be abrogated or eliminated by the Legislature or the electorate for any rational legislative purpose."

"This is proof positive that the VoteYesMarriage.com initiative, which will prevent marriage from being abolished and prevent marriage rights from being eliminated, is absolutely needed to protect the sacred institution of marriage from activist judges and liberal politicians," said Randy Thomasson, an organizer of the VoteYesMarriage.com California Marriage Amendment, which is aiming for the 2008 ballot.

"Protecting the word 'marriage' in the state constitution is useless if the politicians can still get rid of marriage and marriage rights for a man and a woman," concluded Thomasson. "Clearly, the VoteYesMarriage.com amendment, which will override the judges and politicians and preserve everything about marriage for one man and one woman, is the only way to protect this special institution for future generations to respect and enjoy."

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Isn't the governor Catholic?

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The domestic church continues to be under attack just as the church does.

    When marriage is constantly trying to be re-defined and marriage is reduced to a contract, it is no wonder that there is a family crisis in todays families.

    It looks like "The Terminator" is trying to terminate the sacramental dimension of marriage. And, yes, the governor is Catholic.

    We need to pray just as hard for the domestic church as we do for the Church.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Gosh, Governator, why bother keep ANY of English Common Law?  Why not redefine "son" so that I can inherit all your money?

    This is not merely an attack on marriage and family, as pernicious and evil as that is.  It is an attack on meaning, language, and law. 

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    The Governator is a putz! Fool and idiot, however ‘Catholic’, like his Kennedy-clan wife, or, say, Gray Davis, or the Pat-and-Jerry Browns of California!

    Return address: Thal, Austria: stamped “Return to Sender”

    Remember, I love you, too

    Reminding that we are all on the same side – His,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Yes, dear Elkabrikir, he claims he is Catholic.  So do Edward Kennedy, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, et al.  Just because I live in a garage doesn't make me a car.

    This is sickening.  Poor California.Cry

Leave a Reply