Catholic Exchange

Cardinal Murphy O’Connor Versus the Poles

It has been a busy Advent and Christmas season for the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster. He has, in a space of a few months, outraged, shocked and disgusted a surprisingly broad cross section of his flock. Polish immigrants, noted for the vibrancy of their Catholic faith; Catholic pro-lifers who have held the line for decades in the fight with little help from the hierarchy; and Catholic traditionalists who have spent decades living in near-exile from their own Church, have felt the back of Cormac Cardinal Murphy O'Connor's hand recently.

He started the season early with his official rejection in November of Pope Benedict's document removing the power of bishops to block the celebration of the pre-Vatican II rite of the Mass, an issue that has broad connections to acceptance of Catholic doctrine in a variety of areas, including moral issues.

Traditionalist Catholics are almost universally pro-life and pro-family, whereas many of those who have actively fought against the re-instatement of the ancient liturgical practices have also consistently championed a "progressive" Catholicism that rejects the moral law, particularly in sexual morality.

By the end of December, a week after his Christmas homily in which he urged Britons to be more accepting of immigrants, Murphy O'Connor had blasted Polish immigrants who are pouring into Britain in search of work.

In a homily, the Cardinal who heads the Catholic Church of England and Wales, urged the Polish community to learn English and integrate into local parishes. He claimed the Catholic Church in the UK was in danger of dividing along ethnic lines. The comments shocked both the Polish Catholic community and Catholic observers who have seen the influx of devout Poles as a desperately needed boost to sagging attendance and the increasingly grim outlook for the future of the Catholic Church in this country.

With photos appearing in the Telegraph of Poles kneeling devoutly on the sidewalk to hear Mass broadcast outside an overcrowded church, it is perhaps unsurprising that Polish leaders responded to the Cardinal's comments saying they felt "violated" and "spiritually raped". The comments made many Catholic commentators wonder aloud just what kind of Catholic immigrant the Cardinal would prefer.

But Britain learned just before Christmas what kind of Catholic their Cardinal does think is suitable.  His real coup de grace, and perhaps his largest insult to the most faithful Catholics in the country, came at his unconditional reception into the Church of the man SPUC head John Smeaton identified as the major "architect of the Culture of Death" in this country: Tony Blair.

Cardinal O'Connor received Blair in a "private" ceremony in the Cardinal's own residential chapel. Neither the Cardinal's office, nor Blair's offered any explanation or retraction of the former Prime Minister's long record of anti-Catholic and anti-life policies.

To add insult to injury, an unnamed "Church source" presumed to be close to the Cardinal's office, had even chastised critics in the Daily Mail for daring to question the Cardinal's Christmas-week generosity. The Mail's source said, "Whatever he previously believed or did is a matter for individual conscience."

But the pro-life community, particularly its Catholic contingent, are so wearied by the decades of flaccidity, compromising and temporising and outright irreligion of its religious leadership, it hardly bothered to give a collective sigh of disgust. Among the pro-life Catholics of my acquaintance, the response was largely a quick shake of the head and a sickened laugh. In Britain's Catholic Church this latest outrage from its leadership was nothing more than business as usual. 

At the same time, the odd news that Catholic attendance at weekly church services had, for the first time since the Reformation, outstripped that of Anglicans brought forward headlines like "Britain has become a 'Catholic country'" from the Telegraph. But the notion brought only sour and grim amusement to many British Catholic bloggers who have faithfully chronicled the growth of secularist anti-Christian hostility in British society, heavily abetted by the BBC's virtual monopoly on broadcast media. Despite the wild suppositions in the mainstream media, those who have been keeping track know that the news reflected only the continuing general collapse of British religious adherence.

The truth is simply that the native British have abandoned Christianity. It is easy to see what has alarmed Cardinal Cormac. The Poles are, quite simply, making him, and the Church he leads, look bad.

The robust, generous and stalwart faith of these people, tested through generations of brutal Communist suppression, has given them an ability to see through the fog of nonsense that has emanated out of British chanceries since the 1960's. And the Cardinal knows it. It is clear that the divide between the faith of the Poles and the dreary, watery, and half-hearted British Catholicism, content to allow the last dregs of its faith and devotion slowly to evaporate, is greater than one of language.

It is evident that whatever the Catholic leadership of this country has been doing for the last four decades, it has not been a boon to British Catholic faith or practice. If Cormac Murphy O'Connor is aware of the condition of his Church, he has chosen an odd way of expressing his concern by chastising the new Polish faithful for their very faithfulness.

Maybe the Cardinal should try a different tack, and take his own advice and accept the contribution of these people.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

     

    The spirit of the anti Christ comes in many forms. The smoke of satan has indeed entered the sanctuary.

     

    God help our British cousins and God bless the immigrant Poles.

     

    AndyP/Doria2        Yonkers,  NY    HOSEA 4:6

     

     

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    There is a centuries old Polish Christmas Carol that is sung to the dignified beat of the Polonaise. It starts with “God is being born, the powers tremble….” A later verse commands: “It’s your fate, oh impoverished, to acknowledge Him before the rich….”  The immigrants are living out that command and indeed the pusillanimous powers are trembling.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    In his riches man lacks wisdom

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am concerned about the lack of charity in regards to Mr. Blair's conversion. Perhaps we should all go back and read the parable traditionaly refered to as "The Prodigal Son," then let those of us without sin cast aspersions.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    D.H. The comparison of Blair to the Prodigal Son is not really valid. Blair publicly displayed his sins against the teachings of the Church. He has not shown any repentance in the same manner. If he has done so privately than God bless his conversion. Some of us see it more as an extension of politics into the Church which in this case is entirely compatible with the current Cardinal Archbishop. In another instance it just may be a conversion of convenience. I congratulate Mr. Blair however, because this move may yet bear fruit.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The article says that the Cardinal "urged the Polish community to learn English and integrate into local parishes. He claimed the Catholic Church in the UK was in danger of dividing along ethnic lines." Hardly an anti-Polish or anti-immigrant tirade. There may be other evidence that Polish Catholics in England have been wronged, but LifeSiteNews didn't provide them in this story. Just from reading what's here, the Polish response doesn't make any sense, and neither does the article's tone, that we're supposed to jump on the bandwagon and see Cardinal Murphy O'Connor as being prejudiced against Catholic Poles—though he may well be.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    East of Nowhere, the Poles usually do an excellent job of learning English and assimilate very well. What the Poles understood perfectly is what that statement implied – Come into my English speaking, left wing catholic parishes and stop looking for the orthodox ones which generally are ethnic. The implied prejudice against the immigrants is just part of the Cardinal's overall disdain against the orthodoxy of the Church. That's the real story backed by several examples. If you question that, then back it up with examples to the contrary.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    As a Londoner for the past 10 years, I can say there are degrees of orthodoxy across parishes, and non-coincident degrees of commitment to pro-life and other political issues. The problem is the Bishops' Conference which is a tepid mass of liberal drivel, apparently staffed by people who see themselves as working-class, but are really only left-wingers.

    British Catholicism is shredded by alternately conflicting and reinforcing currents of class, party politics and life issues, in that order. For example, there are (mostly older) people who insist that being a Catholic means you have to vote Labour, and what Tony Blair did for the culture of death is just fine, because he upset the Conservatives/middle class. The younger (John Paul II) generation has its collective head screwed on straight – but there aren't enough of them, partly because most of their parents contracepted!

    Not even the Cardinal is uniformly biased against orthodoxy – he has spoken out in favour of reforming the abortion laws, and he has declared that Catholic adoption agencies should close rather than place children with gay couples – and come under massive attack in the press for his pains. I suspect that a lot what he sees, and what he says in return, gets filtered by the politburo in Ecclestone Square.

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks James Hamilton for that "on the scene report" which is more trustworthy than anything so far. It sounds like the politics there are in line with many of our archdioceses. The more conservative groups then become an irritation to the bishops. The only ones who get an ethnic pass with the red carpet are the Hispanics. If Our Lady of Guadeloupe wants it that way, then I say Si, Si!

    As always, thanks to superb editing, this article got an extra day to reach a reasonable and informative conclusion. 

Leave a Reply