Catholic Exchange

What’s Wrong with “Western Values”

As the Global War on Terror sputters along and the best laid plans of geostrategists seem to gang aft agly, there are various discussions going on all over the media and the blogosphere about the West's lackadaisical and baffled response to Radical Islam.

Not that 9/11 did not galvanize the country.  It most certainly did.  Nobody sentient on that day will ever forget the fury, the sense of purpose, the feeling of closing ranks that steeled us as we witnessed the outrages committed on our nation.  Even here, in the Soviet of Washington where I live, one had the overwhelming sense that "the ents were resolved."  The air was heavy with the will to avenge this crime and stamp out the monsters who had done it.  It was a feeling we will never forget.

But then, falling in love is also a feeling we will never forget — even those 50% of Americans who divorce the person for whom they once had such strong feelings.  And so now we ents find ourselves five years down the road to Isengard, with Iraq sliding into civil war, Afghanistan again menaced by the Taliban, an administration that assures us Osama bin Laden is no longer especially "relevant" to the War on Terror (despite his promises of More to Come), Europe and American elites more likely to regard Bush than bin Laden as Hitler Redux, mobs of Muslim thugs burning down Europe, and reporters for FOX News converting to Islam at the point of a gun.  There seems to be something more to winning a War on Terror than having felt something once upon a time.

What that "something more" might be comes to us in hints from every facet of our culture.  For ever since 9/11, the West has been trying to confront the inflamed disease of Radical Islam with something vaguely called "Western Values."  Yet just how these values are world-winning is no small mystery. 

 Consider: Our proclamation of our glorious war-winning "values" stumble over the very term 9/11.  For it is no small mark of our cultural hollowness that the West was unable to even assign a name to the Day the Postmodern World Changed Forever.  Up till the barren postmodern present, the children of Adam at least retained his ability to give a name to things, including great calamities or dates worthy of note.  Nobody during World War II spoke of "12/7" or "9/1".  11/11/18 was "Armistice Day."  The Stock Market crashed on "Black Thursday," not "10/24."  Even November 22, 1963 is remembered by those who lived it as The Day Kennedy was Shot, not "10/22."  But 9/11 is just 9/11: the first postmodern solemn memorial for a culture that has succeeded so well in extirpating the notion of the sacred and the common that we were never able to decide on anything to call it besides the bare data of its location on the calendrical grid.

Other symptoms of our troubles abound.  Over here, we see the New York Times refusing to show the Danish cartoons out of exquisite sensitivity to Muslim feelings, even as they re-run images of Piss Christ and lecture Christians on their philistinism for taking offense.

Over there is Madonna's latest "Ecce Ho!" moment: mounted on a great big glittering crucifix for the titillation of the Chattering Classes.

Here is a guest on a conservative Talk Radio program, saying that the reason we are losing in Iraq is because we, the nation that invented television and marketing, have done a bad job of "selling" democracy in the Islamosphere.  We need to concentrate more on sales, says he.  Yeah.  Sales. That will fix it. 

Then again, there's Ron Suskind recording that, after subjecting high-ranking Al Quaeda member Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to everything from porn to waterboarding (which, our President assures us, is not torture), the CIA, that bastion of "Western Values," told Mohammed that his children, ages 7 and 9, and in American custody, would be harmed.  Mohammed replied that if we killed his children they would be with God — and refused to talk.

Meanwhile, from the US to Israel to Europe, we also have the phenomenon of an imploding birthrate among Westerners even as Muslim births skyrocket.  As pundit Rod Dreher puts it, "When a culture has to be persuaded to have children, it's over."  If babies are God's way of saying he thinks the world should continue, then contraception is man's way of saying it should end.

Both here and across the Pond, legislators, pundits, teachers and thinkers labor to find ways to relieve the comfortable of the burden of the most helpless via euthanasia.  Every day in the US, a 9/11's worth of babies are put to death in abortuaries, but there are no days of mourning for this because privatized violence is not a crime against the United States, but a glorious right won only after bitter struggle to keep Christians from imposing their rosaries on people's ovaries.

Even in realms as innocuous and dumb as Saturday morning cartoons, we find NBC trying for whatever dollars it might harvest from suburban religiosity by airing Veggie Tales, yet eviscerating the show of any mention of God or the Bible.  In the deathless secular faith in democratic capitalism's power to heal and redeem that has served us so well in Iraq, NBC carries on the constitutional struggle for the separation of Church and Everything.

And right in the middle of all this, columnist David Warren declares his profound disappointment with the FOX news guys for caving in to their kidnappers and converting to Islam, just to escape death.  Can you imagine?  Embracing the core beliefs of our mortal enemies in a time of war, just to save their own skins?  How could they?

My answer:  Very easily!  And if they were not Christians or Jews, why not given the "Western values" that undergird our culture's confrontation with Radical Islam?  Because in our zeal to become a purely secular and de-Christianized country, these "values" have managed to rob the vast majority of our population of any sense of the Transcendent or of the common Good.

This brings us right back to the core question, never really answered in the volcanic surge of Western rage after 9/11: Why are we fighting?  What exactly are we fighting for?

For most in the West, "Western Values" means, basically, a tepid commitment to My Personal Truth of the Moment, modified by various fears of such things as theocracy, lack of abortion rights, getting killed, and having bad cable access. It also means "unfettered commitment to the needs of my groin" and "a vague sense that I am entitled to something." Oh, and there are a few gauzy sentiments about baseball, "God Bless the USA" anthems on country music stations, and remembrances of the Greatest Generation (much as Decadent Rome recalled the noble days of the Republic).  A few other things go into the stew as each Imperial Autonomous Self seasons their "Western values" to taste. But what does not go into it is a common creed or even a sense of the common good.

Consequently, Westerners do not know what to do when our decadent spirituality instantly converts to Islam at gunpoint while the inflamed spirituality of Radical Islam is quite willing to let its children die (at the hands of torturers dedicated to preserving "Western values").

Make no mistake.  I'm not one to boast "Lord, even if everyone else were to deny You, I will never deny You!" I've heard that song before and pray "lead us not into temptation" lest I make an idiot of myself were I in the place of the FOX reporters. I hope that, as a Christian, I would have the stones to take a bullet or be beheaded rather than renounce my Lord, Who bought me with His blood. But I don't know what I'm made of, the heart being desperately wicked and all.

However, that said, I have to add that, if I were not a believer and guided only by "Western values," I don't see what the big deal would be if I pretended to convert to Islam in order to save my skin. If all I'm betraying is Madonna, Planned Parenthood, the Glory of Sodomy, and You Deserve A Break Today, then I don't know that some inchoate tribal fealty to the Abercrombie and Fitch brand label would persuade me to make my wife a widow and my children fatherless.

So, unlike Mr. Warren, I'm not particularly amazed by the gutlessness of the FOX News guys in the face of forcible conversion, since I have no particular reason to think they were betraying some ultimate trust.  Looking at the post-Christian and often anti-Christian "Western values" in which we have been steeped for the past generation, I have no particular reason to think they even have a concept of an Ultimate Trust.

The bottom line is this, Mr. Warren: If the FOX journos were Christians or believing Jews, it would have been a different story. Such people are commanded to remain faithful to the covenant they have received unto death, if necessary.  In their case, your disappointment would be justifiable.  But our culture has labored for 40 years to create a populace in which all reference to the Transcendent has been stamped out of existence. To suddenly be appalled when a citizen of that culture demonstrates that his vision is no higher than a cow's is a strange reaction to men who acted exactly as all our Manufacturers of Culture have programmed them to act.  It's a bit hard to, in the words of C.S. Lewis, "castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful."

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    WOW, RIGHT ON THE MONEY! I MUST ADMIT, I, TOO, HESITATED OVER WHETHER IT WAS WORTH DEATH TO LIE ABOUT A GUN-FORCED “CONVERSION”. ALTHOUGH IT WAS DISHEARTENING TO WITNESS, I’M NOT UPSET THAT THOSE REPORTERS AVOIDED BECOMING MARTYRS. YET, IMAGINE THEY HAD BEEN KILLED FOR THEIR REFUSAL – WOULD THIS HAVE BEEN MORE AMMUNITION AGAINST TERRORISM? I’M NOT EVEN SURE IT WOULD, FOR WE HAVE SEEN BEHEADINGS ON TV AND STILL NO COLLECTIVE “THAT’S IT! NO MORE!” I’M AFRAID YOUR CONCLUSION ABOUT THE U.S. AND US IS SO TRUE – WE HAVE NO COMPELLING REASON TO DIE FOR ANYTHING – MUCH LESS RISK OUR CHILDREN’S LIVES. AND HERE’S A QUERY, DO I WISH TO BE A PERSON WHO WOULD? DOES THAT MAKE ME A LUNATIC? ALTHOUGH I ADMIRE THE COMMITMENT, I FEAR THE MINDSET WHICH SEEMS TO BE A TAD TOO EAGER TO DIE FOR A CAUSE.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    WOW! I can only say that Mark hit the nail right on the head. People today won’t even say “Merry Christmas” for fear of offending someone, why would you expect them to die for their faith (that’s assuming they had any in the first place)?

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Been thinking along your lines for a while, Mark, a looong while.

    I look over at Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” on my bookshelf, and marvel at the 1800-odd pages. Sadly, the girth of the thing has kept almost all modern Americans from reading it. And it did surprise me that his conclusion wasn’t as clear to him as it was to me:

    “The Roman Empire fell because the average Roman, deep in his gut, one man at a time, decided that the whole revolting pile of crap just wasn’t worth saving any more.”

    Of course, I’d also guess that if you’d be able to poll them 100 years later looking back, they’d probably agree overwhelmingly they’d made the wrong choice. But alas, men compare things they way they are to the way they oughta be, not the way they’ll be if we do nothing. And it is the responsibility of the leadership of a nation to keep things reasonably close to the way they oughta be. And ours have failed, pathetically.

    Would I die, and what’s more, volunteer my sons to die, for a nation where you really can’t own anything, you only rent it from the State? (Call it what you want to, $4000 a year in Property Tax on your “fully-paid-for-house” is rent. Period.

    Would I die for a State and a culture that gives unelected officials, many with haphazardly researched pasts, the power to arbitrarily take my children away from me whilst demanding that I prove to THEM why I deserve to get them back?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that guarantees the “right” of women to murder a million children a year in the name of not inconveniencing themselves for 9 months to put the child up for adoption?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that reviles, suspends, and even expels kids for mentioning their faiths in class, yet gets all sanctimonious about the rights of pornographers to spew their filth to those same kids?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that any day now will demand that I and my sons grab a rifle to go kill the Enemy, yet is constantly attempting to take the personal weapons I stand ready to defend my home with?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that supposedly guarantees me the right of free association in it’s Bill of Rights, then forces me to accept anyone that applies to work for me, regardless of how despicable I believe their personal practices are?

    Would I die for State and a culture that perpetuates the largest budgetary Ponzi scheme in the history of the world, and keeps adding to it regardless of political party in power, in the craven name of getting reelected, and passes untold future liabilities to our descendants, who are incapable of defending themselves, even with a vote? (Assuming they escape the abortionist’s knife?)

    Would I die for a State and a culture that spends a trillion dollars supposedly “nation-building” in Iraq in the name of The War on Terrorism, and then not only does nothing to secure our borders, but actively destroys the few politicians who try to seal the borders, leaving the back door open to any bozo with a suitcase nuke bought for a song from some Outer Mongolia rim-based Russian commander? Who are we kidding? How stupid do they think we are?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that bullies and browbeats the major corporations and government agencies into rewarding and “celebrating the diversity” of a childless lifestyle, leaving it to those of us who do have children to rear them to be harnessed with an impossible tax burden to pay for THEIR medical and retirement, all the while their media demands they pay taxes no higher than ours, and calls us “breeders” despectively in the bargain?

    Would I die for a State and a culture that goes out of its way to crap all over everything I hold dear, everything I think noble, everything worth living for?

    Why?

    Sorry. You can’t take away everything this country was when I was a kid, and then insist I keep my end of the social contract. Not with the way the “end” they are holding smells the way it does today.

    And now, when they REALLY need men to go fight for them, to get us out of the botched mess they’ve made, go look at the Drudge Report’s main page today 12/26/06.

    They are already beginning to offer citizenship to foreigners who’ll come fight for us. Because of course, they can’t find anybody in this country stupid enough to believe their siren-song of “liberty and justice for all” any more. Or maybe they’re too scared to find out by re-introducing the draft.

    My God, I weep bitter tears for my country, the one I remember.

    The one they trashed.

    If I wasn’t a Catholic, I’d actually be tempted to stick around to watch them destroyed in a personal paroxysm of schadenfreude.

    Thankfully, I have a Lord and a Promise.
    Because I don’t know how an atheist can live in this world, I honestly don’t.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    “If babies are God’s way of saying he thinks the world should continue, then contraception is man’s way of saying it should end.”

    What a statment of original sin: I will do it my way and be like God without Him. Very powerful and cogent statement, Mark.

    Fortunately for us, our young men and women in harm’s way see the transcendant values of America that others are throwing away, as they stand between us and jihad. May we turn back to those values and be worthy of these children of ours.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Dying for a worldly cause is not what we Christians should be doing, but dying for a Godly cause is another thing entirely. If we are willing to martyr ourselves like the 1st century christians, and also many christians today by not denying Jesus, it is a worthy cause. We also need to have faith that God will provide for those we leave behind, and pray our loved one’s understand what we did and seek God’s comfort in their time of loss. We don’t want them to hate our enemies, but pray for them. The people who will do or say anything to stay alive are just not ready for Eternity, and what God has promised those who deny Him.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Excellent, Mark, as usual! The cult of the Imperial Self is so pernicious and insidious, it’s downright scary — and the idea of anyone forgetting their own precious “autonomy”, etc., for a Higher Good is, in our culture (both in the US and Canada )tantamount to heresy. The thing today is, “I will not serve!” — and we know who said that first! Yes, it is tough to stand up for the faith in these times, but as Acescalona said, we are blessed to have a Lord and a Promise .. and it’s true, life is tough enough when you have faith, but for the life of me I don’t know how anyone can consciously reject that faith or dismiss it as a bunch of hooey. Without faith, nothing makes any sense. Mary’s faith and trust in God made the Birth of Jesus possible. May God grant us all such faith and trust in Him this coming year.

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    In 1937 Hilare Belloc, a Catholic historian, wrote about the Crusades and Islam, saying many of the same things you are saying now. He concluded that Islam would find a resurgence and that we would have to face the Crusades again, this time from a place of spiritual bankruptcy.

    Raised as a protestant, I was drawn to the Church by the Holy Spirit in spite of the effort of the people of God. I became a “Catholic” in the 1970s at a “Catholic” university, under the “guidance” of a Jesuit priest. Over the years I was a member of parishes run by Dominicans and diocesan priests trained by Benedictines, but I remainded a protestant Catholic because I had no clue what treasures were hidden from the people of God by their leaders and fellow believers. 25 years later, I am finally beginnning to understand what it really means to be a Christian. The faith is so rich and life-giving! Why are we making it our best-kept-secret?

    Why should we be surprised that those we have raised in a culture “protected” from Christianity, where Christians themselves have practiced a form of political shame, should then turn to a religion of whom its adherants are proud? Perhaps their conversion was not a sham–after all, aren’t we created to long for something worth more than our own lives, more than our own meager thoughts? If the culture in which we are raised is ashamed of its core beliefs, enthralled with pagan religions, unwilling to draw moral lines in the sand, then is it not natural for us to look elsewhere for life’s meaning? The anwer to the problem of Islam is for us Christians, especially Catholic Christians, to learn our faith and then radically follow it ourselves, using our lives as 1)songs of praise and obedience to our God, 2)weapons against the enemy of our souls and 3)witnesses for evangelization of our spiritually bankrupt fellow-humans.

    It is time for us to evangelize ourselves, to dig deep into our rich heritage, to draw from the wonderful graces of our Lord, and then to encourage our new-found faith to grow, not just in our hearts, but in our lives. Only then will we be able to withstand the attacks from the pagans, whether they be Muslum or secular.

    Peace, blessing and faith to all of you!
    Ruth

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    In response to “onelmunn”, may I offer a corollary to a response I’ve given on another matter? In one hundred years (or less), you and your children will all be dead. That’s a fact. Everything that lives, dies. BUT, whether you’ve died for “a cause” or not is entirely up to you. You could die for the cause of “hypocholesteromia” (high cholesterol) by eating an overabundance of animal fats. You could die for the cause of “hypercarnality” by having sexual relations with anything and everything that moves (not limited to humans)and getting AIDS. Or, you could die for the cause of Christ by being martyred. Between you and me, I’d just as soon die as St. Teresa of Jesus (Avila) wished when she and her little brother, as children, ran away from home to go to the south of Spain and be martyred by the Moslems. If they kill me, they do me a favor.
    And, by the way, if you enjoy sports or movies or your children/grandchildren, you call yourself a “fan”. Did you know that the word “fan” is an short-hand term for “fanatic”? Oh, that we all could be “fans” of Jesus!!!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I agree. There is much in America that is weak and shallow. We are our own worst enemy and ill prepared for the onslaught of Radical Islam. Yet everyday our military puts itself on the line to defend our nation with all its potential for greatness. I’m inclined to believe that these men and women are motivated by a belief in the Transcendent, evidence that our system has not completely failed. We too must believe that their courage and sacrifice will not be in vain.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I thoroughly enjoyed your thought provoking article, Mark. As always, I particularly enjoy your Chestertonesque tongue-in-cheek style. This article offered an excellent introspection into the beliefs of the culture of death. There was one thing that sat wrong with me though, particularly after reading Acescalona’s comments (you know – the ‘Would I die” guy). He’s perfectly correct in asserting that there is nothing of value in the culture of death worth dying for. But the souls of those caught up in the culture of death is exactly what Christ died for.
    Our country (and the permissive culture it now tolerates) is still a better place to live than most other places on earth. If you don’t believe me, go travel and see for yourself. I would still rather live in a country of permissive values than one of hard-line radicalism. (At least I can freely travel to any area and still go to Mass and receive the Sacraments).
    As a military member, I can honestly say to Aceascalona that no, I would not die for the Western “values” as presented by Mark, but I would die for my fellow serviceman, for my fellow countrymen, for my Constitution that allows us to freely change the direction of our country if we can mass enough support for that change, and most of all I would die for my family and our right to attend Mass.
    So the question then becomes what would you die for? Or, more poigantly, what would you live for? In this current war, we are engaged with an enemy who wants us to submit to his religion or die. My great-great grandfather was martyred in 1890 in Syria at the hands of this enemy. My family immigrated to the US in 1910 from Lebanon because of this ememy (This enemy has been around long before the creation of the State of Israel after WWII).
    I implore you not make the mistake of thinking that Western ‘values’ are a worse enemy. The culture of death exists because, frankly, we Catholics have gotten lazy and not evangelized the truth to our friends and neighbors.
    So my question to Acescalona then is:
    Would I die to self and visit my neighbor with dual income two kids and explain to him the beauty of the Church;s teaching on openness to life?
    Would I die to self and go to a prison and explain Christ’s life-giving message?
    Woud I die to self and care for the hungry, poor, downtrodden, and dying with my own two hands? Or will I just write another check?
    If you want to change western ‘values’ back then you have to do something about it with love in your heart.

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    To theshahids:

    I try to do something about it every chance I get. I used to hide the books I read at my business from customers in order “not to offend them” until I understood I was denying Him, and quit hiding Him under a bushel, and been repaid with wonderful conversations I would never have had. I have asked Him to use me any way He wishes, to make my will conform to His every day that passes.

    That said, as a citizen of this Republic, I am now in what the Founding Fathers would have called a “State of Nature.” The current government, by both parties, has broken its social contract with me, and has wiped itself with our Constitution. Until self-preservation shocks our ruling elites back into compliance, I am and will stay in protest, and will not support it.

    If drafted, I will serve as a medic, there are never enough medics. But even though according to our Catechism there are conditions under which I may kill in the name of my country, that country, as currently managed, has broken those conditions, and thus I will not slay in it’s name, only heal, with love in my heart, heavy though it might be. Until they get the message.

    I will not let them blackmail me into defending whatever they decide “Western Values” are this year, in the name of turning back a worse Enemy. Many a young German boy learned the hard way what letting your government blackmail you can lead to, in the name of turning back the much worse Bolshevik menace. We’re not there yet, but if we don’t stand up to them, it could eventually get that way. Let them read Gibbon, and think hard, because I’m nowhere near the only alienated citizen out here. And I’m a conservative, always have been. Never a Democrat, and haven’t been able to call myself a Republican in a long time.

    Happy New Year, Americs. You need one, badly.

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    to Cooky642

        It is true, the "cause" is the important aspect, not just the dying.  If I am a "fan" of Jesus, then even at the threat of watching my own children be murdered I would not waver, with the grace of God I could also forgive  their murderers. It definitely would take a miracle to reach that point, but of course God is capable of miracles! Thank God!

Leave a Reply