Catholic Exchange

What Psalm 1 Teaches Us about the Pursuit of Happiness

The pursuit of happiness.

It’s in our Declaration of Independence. It’s an ideal enshrined in many of our laws. It’s why we work so hard. Why we marry. Why we go on diets, choose to live in certain areas, have children, and save money for retirement. Most of us are pursuing happiness one way or another.

The first Psalm offers a different path to happiness.

The Psalm begins with a ‘blessed’ man—‘blessed’ being a biblical term that corresponds to our secular idea of happiness. The Psalm envisions this happy man in idyllic terms as a ‘tree planted near streams of water’ yielding fruit in season, never withering but always prospering (verse 3). The image is one that connotes peace, refreshment, and fruitfulness—what many would consider elements of happiness.

How does one become like such a fruit stream by streams of water? Here’s the answer Psalm 1 gives: “[T]he law of the Lord is his joy; and on his law he meditates day and night” (verse 2)

At first, this might seem the very opposite of joy. When one thinks of joyful reading, law books of any kind don’t even make the list. And, in a biblical context, Leviticus doesn’t exactly have a reputation for being riveting reading. The Psalm, however, goes all in on this point, further suggesting that the happy man even meditates on the law. One wonders whether even the most devoted of law student does this.

But a closer look at this verse reveals that much more is going on here than meets the eye.

First, a clarification. ‘Law’ as used here means more than just simple laws—although those are certainly included. Instead, the word for law in Hebrew is the Torah, which in its broader sense referred to all five books of the Pentateuch—that includes Genesis, Exodus, Deuteronomy, and Numbers, along with Leviticus. And, in the time of David, this would have been extended to include such books as Judges and Job.

(Of course, this is not to say that the actual laws could not be a source of meditation. One thinks especially of the Ten Commandments. For an example illustration of deep reflection on the Ten Commandments I recommend Pope Benedict’s Jesus of Nazareth.)

The creation. The delights of Eden. God’s continuing presence despite sin. The exodus. All are indeed sources of ‘joy.’ The Hebrew word for joy here (chephets, pronounced khā’·fets) is rich in meaning. It refers to one’s desire, something precious (like a precious stone), and also pursuit.

Is the ‘law’ of the Lord our deepest desire? Is it something precious to us? Is it something we pursue?

Psalm 1 says it is for the happy man. And it is from such joy that unceasingly meditation proceeds.

Notice that the Psalm actually begins with the negative: with what the happy man does not do. It lists three activities with the company of sinners: walking, standing, and sitting.

Walking is fittingly first. In the Old Testament, a healthy relationship with God is depicted this way. Enoch ‘walked’ with God in Genesis 5:24 and was likely assumed into heaven. For Abraham ‘walking’ became a way of life: our forefather in faith was called to wander from his home city Ur. For most of his life, Abraham always seemed on the move with his tents, never quite settling in cities, even shunning them. (Think of the stories of Abraham greeting the angels from his tent and of Lot in Sodom.)

This is what we know life in Christ to be: a journey, a walk with God, a pilgrim’s progress to paradise.

But notice how the initial image of the Psalm appears to contrast with the later one. The happy man does not ‘walk’ with sinners. In the context of the Old Testament, the reader would naturally conclude that the happy man thus walks with the righteous—most importantly, the Righteous One.

But that’s not quite the image the Psalm gives us when it positively depicts the happy man. Instead, he is like a ‘tree planted near streams of water.’ This seems to be the very picture of stability, i.e. not walking.

Have we misread the beginning of the Psalm?

I don’t think so. The idea seems to be that in walking with God we find true stability, true rest. What a contrast this is with the unhappy man—constantly changing, first walking, then standing, then sitting with the sinners at the beginning of the Psalm.

Rest. A tree of life. Flowing waters. Sound familiar? Some interpreters see hints of the Garden of Eden here. (Two examples I found are here and here.) It is perhaps not terribly too surprising that the first Psalm is seeking to depict the happy man by hearkening back to the terrestrial paradise. What is surprising is that this Psalm points to a clear path back to Eden: meditation on the law of God.

A note on sources: The author is particularly grateful to his father, biblical scholar G.K. Beale, for initially pointing out the predominant theme of happiness in this Psalm.

Comments

4 responses to “What Psalm 1 Teaches Us about the Pursuit of Happiness”

  1. John Radice Avatar

    The word ‘law’ as a translation for תורה has been a stumbling block for many Christians when reading the OT. It has also led to the caricaturization of Israel’s religion as ‘legalistic’, an Aunt Sally to contrast with the Gospel.

    Torah is based on the root y-r-a with the sense of to aim or direct. The Hebrew for parent has the same root. Hence, the underlying meaning is to direct us in our life, to instruct us in the way we should go. Secondarily, as you say, the word became attached to the body of writings, the Pentateuch; and also to the Oral Law which in turn became written down and is also far more than mere rules and regulations.

    Hebrew has five other words which more closely correspond to ‘law’ in English. All six are repeatedly used in Psalm 119.

    Some translations capitalise Law to alert the reader that it’s Torah, but inconsistently.

    There’s no real solution: it’s the curse of Babel!

  2. Kevin Scholes Avatar
    Kevin Scholes

    i believe there s great blessing in meditating on the law but the bible is progressive revelation and jesus christ has been revealed so it would be better to meditate on him now king david didn’t know God as Jesus but we do and can so meditate on Jesus see Jesus in the old testament in the law not simply on the law itself

  3. John Radice Avatar

    “Progressive revelation”. Certainly, but not to be understood in any way which lessens the truth and inspiration of the older parts. Because of how ‘the New in the Old’ is revealed, we gain more out of the study and meditation upon the OT than we could before, for ‘the Old in the New’ is also revealed. Catholics tend to be less familiar with the OT, and that’s to our loss. One unarguable gain from the Novus Ordo is the new lectionary, which has all parts of Scripture better represented.

  4. Kevin Scholes Avatar
    Kevin Scholes

    Hi there John i agree with you that Jesus can be seen in the old but it is only as a type and shadow but now we have the fullness the substancein Jesus. Theres so much in the old testament thats not for us today and theres so much thats changed because Jesus has come we need to read it in light of the new otherwise you may end up being bewitched having begun in the spirit you might finish in the flesh like paul said in galatians going back to the old covenant We have a new covenant now its completely different from law to grace abrahamic and davidic fulfilled new jerusalem, new priesthood new law, new temple, new way of living by the spirit, prophets longed to see what we see and hear what we hear. He who is least in the kingdom is greater than any prophet in th old testament. GOD has died for us thats far greater than anything the old testment of law a way of leading us to Jesus. Ok Jesus said thers treasure in the old so i hope you find it

Leave a Reply