Catholic Exchange

What Lies Ahead for Our Catholic Schools?

Last month, I submitted an editorial to the Grand Rapids Press, a newspaper in my hometown of Grand Rapids, Michigan.  The topic of the editorial was Catholic schools.  Specifically, my article responded to a proposal by the Diocese of Grand Rapids and Grand Rapids Catholic Secondary Schools to create two new middle schools. 

Many Catholics in my diocese, including myself, understood the proposal to mandate the closure of the seventh and eight grades at each of the parish schools.  Apparently, however, Catholic parents will have a choice between continuing with the parish schools or sending their children to the new middle schools.  (This fact first became apparent in a recent article published in the Grand Rapids Press on November 21st.  Prior to then, this was never made clear by anyone from the Diocese of Grand Rapids.  Regardless, this fact does not change my analysis of the issue.)

The new middle-school proposal is presented as a solution to a steady decline in enrollment in local Catholic grade schools.  Being myself a product of one of these schools, I mulled over the decision of whether to submit an op-ed to the local newspaper and spent a considerable amount of time drafting the article.  The point I raised in my article is that the best way for Catholic schools to stem the decline in enrollment and convince local Catholics that the expenditure on tuition is worthwhile is to rediscover and reclaim the schools' true Catholic identity and sense of purpose.  What I found especially troubling by the proposal is that it comes after a period widely noted for a failure to do this very thing.

A Look at Where Growth Is Taking Place

 To support my point, I made a general reference to the religious orders, schools, and dioceses that skirted conventional wisdom and, through sheer love of and commitment to orthodox Catholic teaching and tradition, have witnessed tremendous growth in the past few years.

Incidentally, Time magazine recently ran an article about the "new nuns," the female religious orders that have experienced this growth.  Overall, Time presented a decent synopsis of this renewal and seemed to capture the essence of the driving force behind it.  What is causing these young women to answer the call and dedicate themselves to a lifetime of service?  I find symbolism in a rather simple thing: the habit.  These new nuns, as the Time article points out, wear the habit and live what it represents — a courageous announcement of their public witness, an identifiable community, a loving embrace of their religious and cultural heritage.  They seek to live a certain life in a certain way, to work in the world but not be "of" it.

This news may surprise some.  Nuns?  Yes, nuns.  They're back!  For years we've prepared ourselves for their extinction, as though they were some breed inadaptable to modernity, a mere product of a bygone era that bears no relation to the present-day.  Many female religious orders literally threw the habit out in the wake of the Second Vatican Council and embraced a new identity and mission.  History is now providing valuable insight into those decisions: these orders are not the ones attracting the "new nuns."  This same phenomenon can also be observed in the priesthood.  In light of this renewal, I proposed the same courageous embrace of orthodoxy and tradition as the solution for the Catholic schools in my diocese.

Overall, the article received a positive response.  "This is what I've been trying to tell our school for years," one woman told me after Sunday Mass.  The article provoked much discussion around the diocese.  I even received a few letters, some from home-school families who felt they had few other options: public school or a Catholic school that has lost much of what makes it Catholic.  To say the least, I didn't quite expect such a widespread, positive reaction.  But it is telling: a layman who does not particularly have any "expertise" or experience in the realm of education (least of all Catholic education), I merely expressed a common sentiment.  But maybe this issue doesn't require any "expertise."  Could it be, in fact, that this issue has suffered from a bit of over-expertise in recent decades, which has only worked to cloud the heart of the matter: what makes these schools Catholic?

Of course, there were a few adverse reactions.  One letter to the editor, written by a former Dominican nun, decried my apparent call for "Churchianity" (whatever that is) and said we don't need to "re-circle the wagons" now.  But that aside, my article received an answering op-ed by a former Catholic school principal.  He felt my solution was "too simplistic," noting that how we got to where we are today is the result of a complex set of historical forces.  Our schools' answer to such things as declining enrollment, therefore, requires something a little more than a "mere" rediscovery of their Catholic identity and mission.  He cited the need for "innovation" and "new marketing strategies."  In short, he felt that the proposal to build new middle schools would attract more students, noting one particular reality of the present-day marketplace: Catholic parents today are less likely to follow Church doctrine and attend Mass.

I drafted a brief reply and contacted the Grand Rapids Press again.  Unfortunately, I was told that such "back and forth" is not permitted in their newspaper.  (Perhaps I was merely thinking like a lawyer: in court briefings, a party is usually permitted to file a reply to the opposing party's response brief.)  I thought there were a few additional points worth noting, so having brought you, dear reader, current on the discussion, I'll recite them here.

The Essentials: Identity and Mission

First, whether the topic is our schools, parish, diocese, or Church — even our own family life — we have to be extremely careful not to operate from the false historiographical premise that "where we are today" is somehow the byproduct of a set of complex, omnipotent historical forces that were unstoppable as they occurred and that are undoable now.  Why are we now "here?"  Because, in so many ways, this is precisely where we put ourselves.  By labeling an issue "complex," we truncate our ability to analyze it fully.  That amounts to nothing more than intellectual laziness.

Second, the principal cited the need to get beyond a "parochial mentality" in determining how to "move forward" with our Catholic schools.  If that was meant as a call to fund our schools at the Diocesan level, with each parish contributing regardless of whether they have a school, then I certainly agree.  However, as a general matter, I don't think it is some nebulous "parochial mentality" that hinders us; rather, our schools have simply lost sight of themselves.  A Catholic school has the potential to provide an education that no other educational institution can provide.  Regardless of whatever form a Catholic school takes — whether a new middle school or a traditional parochial grade school — the same problem will exist if the true identity and mission of those institutions is not clearly identified and focused upon as the primary aim of education.  Any structural solution, absent this cultural renewal, merely shifts the problem to a different form.

Finally, by sheer logic, the identity and mission of any Catholic institution is fundamental to all other considerations.  That is where the challenge lies.  Without this proper starting point, the entire issue of "how to move forward" remains unripe for consideration.  A truly Catholic (i.e. universal) solution will operate on this base level.  It will treat the disease, not just attempt to control one of its symptoms.  Our parishes, therefore, are critical to any effort to move forward.  It is there where any and all efforts toward true renewal will have their greatest impact.

Far from "simplistic," this has always been our biggest challenge.  Recent history has shown that where this challenge is lovingly and thoroughly embraced true renewal and growth have occurred.  The "new nuns" are but one example of this valuable life lesson, something worth pondering by individual Catholics, parishes, and Catholic institutions everywhere.   

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Really an exceptional article. I changed from teaching in the public sector into teaching at our local Catholic high school about ten years ago because it become evident that sitting around and complaining wasn’t going to change anything. I assure you, there are some extraodinary spiritual battles taking place within our Catholic Schools – and this is a sign of how important they are. The Church documents on education make it clear that the Church considers Catholic Schools as extraordinarily important. But forces within our “progressive” culture (even within the local – US Church) are no longer convinced. Please – Catholic Schools are worth the battle, and Mr. Noto is exactly correct about what is needed. Please – get involved in your local Catholic schools.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I seems all Catholic schools in the Dallas Diocese are not up to speed. I found
    one 7th grader who did not know the difference between Hosts being blessed or
    consecrated, and told the principal, she said she not surprised..WHAT, does she
    not suppose to teach the difference. The child never heard of consecration .

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The problem you still must address and rectify is the mindset that all we have to do to have a “Catholic” school is slap a crucifix on the walls of the classroom. Until my wife and I removed our children from the Catholic school in 2004 and homeschooled them with a truly Catholic curriculum, we had no idea what a truly Catholic school should look like. We stumbled on to this because of our frustration with other issues. It surprised us that our parish school was anything but Catholic! The texts were all secular, and in many of them, the political correctness was over the top. When we went to the Catholic homeschooling program, we were amazed at how Catholic all the subjects could be taught. How Jesus, the Faith, and the Church could be the centerpiece of the curriculum. When our kids were in the parish school, they only attended mass at school on Holy Days of Obligation! The funny thing is that when we started attending daily mass with our kids, some of our “regular” daily attendees complained to our pastor. They felt we were a distraction. After word got back to us that we were not “welcome” at daily mass, we quit going. Our kids went back to school (public) this past fall because they had just had enough of each other. We do our best to teach our children the Faith through our actions and behaviors. Unfortunately, in searching for the best Catholic education, the average parent may fall for “new marketing strategies” or “innovation”. The trademarks of “Catholic” education.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I meet many non-Catholics at my daughter’s all girl Catholic
    academy. They joke about being “forced” to go to mass and
    how their Jewish and non-denominational Christian parents are there
    for the strong academics and definitely not for the Catholic faith.
    This makes me very sad considering the sacrifice we are making to
    have our daughter attend the school. Not only is she in competition
    for a seat with these girls but she gets her faith torn to shreds by
    their lunchroom talk. It makes me wonder if the goal is to run a
    challenging school, or to build our Catholic faith. My hope is that we
    are there for the faith of our children and not just to facilitate a good
    SAT score for those families who think our faith is a joke.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    In agreement with Mr. Noto’s commentary, as Pope John Paul II stressed, it is By Way of the Family that we learn our mission and identity. In addition to the importance of parishes’ role in moving forward, where families are nourished in the sacraments and where catechesis is ongoing thru instruction and exegesis during homilies and, in many places, weekly Bible study programs, evangelization efforts to lapsed Catholics are necessary. Many families deal with the effects of divorce with subsequent remarriage outside of the Church. Unless we are honest with the fact that Christians in general are currently poor witnesses to the sanctity of marriage ‘until death do us part’, families will continue to suffer greatly with the effects felt by all children and thus, schools. Back to focus on our Catholic identity and mission, students and families can be nourished with the fullness of the truth within solid Catholic education helping to form good, strong-in-their-faith Catholics leading to solid, strong in their faith vocations. Seeking to know and do God’s will and building a culture of life which counters the materialism and relativism that so often obstructs God’s calls for vocations will solve current challenges. I question a schools’ identity when mass is offered only four times a year with the use of popular, secular music and where those students who helped plan and choose such “music” are applauded after mass. There is a gap between the majority of parents and students who do not recognize such a lack of reverential worship and those who do. Often it is the majority who determines a school’s identity. Despite financial difficulties, should a Catholic school request dispensation from bishop and bishop grant it, to hold a fundraiser during Lent and sell beef dinners on Friday? Wherever possible, could schools offer confessions on first Thursdays with mass on first Fridays of the month?

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Way to go Mr. Noto.

    When and if Catholic schools start to really teach the Catholic faith, I will send my 6 kids to a Catholic school. Until then, there are plenty of people who want to go to Catholic schools for the wrong reasons.

    I do wish and pray for improvement, but most Principals will not listen to realists like Mr. Noto.

    I send my kids to public school and teach them their Catholism at home. They go to CCD just so they get a feel of the community of Catholicism. I teach CCD as well.

    GK – God is good!

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    The problem is the schools are trying to keep some very secular parents happy. This is what this principal is getting at by pointing out “Catholic parents today are less likely to follow Church doctrine and attend Mass”. That makes delivering a real Catholic education a big challenge. Then we have school adminstators who are not really interested in meeting that challenge. If the majority of the parents want the faith watered down they are happy to do that. They get into a few fights with the bishop but overall it is the path of least resisitance.

    We need to remind ourselves of why these schools exist. They exist to teach every subject from a Catholic world and life viewpoint. Parents, teachers, and administrators all need to buy into that idea or go find another school. Once there has been a drift towards secularism it is very hard to reverse. I know my bishop is trying and it is an uphill struggle. Some private schoools are trying with uniforms and daily mass. The trouble they run into price. They become too expensive for larger families. Then you end up with a bunch of one and two child families who are really not terribly orthodox. It is complex.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I can surely appreciate the comments being made on this string. However, tne best way to make a Catholic school Catholic, is for good Catholics to get involved. If everyone “gives up” on our Catholic schools, then we will never reclaim our Catholic Schools. Granted, your children might benefit by leaving a Catholic school. But many more children would benefit (including your own) if you could change your Catholic school. Get involved!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I enjoyed Mr Noto’s article a great deal. I think it would be wonderful if the Bishop’s office in Grand Rapids would listen to the parents of children currently enrolled in the elementary schools, as many prefer keeping all of their children at the same Catholic elementary school instead of separating them until it is necessary. Why break up the family and have different schedules when the people who are already choosing Catholic schools are happy? This is an expensive proposition to attempt when it may cause a lot more headaches then the Diocese ever could have imagined.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am blessed to belong to a parish that is orthodox in in Catholic identity and practice and also operates the parish school in a very Catholic way. All the boys from the fourth grade on are assigned as Altar servers. There is a school Mass every Friday. Father visits the children in their classrooms once a month. The only difficulties stem from the Archdiocese (Seattle) and the “progressive” agenda and culture that emanates from it regarding curriculum. I attended a catachetical certification course (the first year of a three year curriculum) and was shocked with the poor instruction. The course model itself is pretty good, but it’s implementation is ruined by the dissenters and “ashamed to be Catholic” instructors who teach the curriculum. One example is the use of the terms CE and BCE (“common era” and “before common era”) as opposed to BC and AD when referencing historical events. When I questioned the instructor about the reason for that I was told that they didn’t want to offend anyone by referencing Christ due to the fact that everyone may not be Christian, (the students were all Catholic school teachers or lay catechists). When I pointed out the absurdity of that explanation there was some mumbling and then the subject was quickly changed.

    My point being, even with a great parish full of well educated and faith filled Catholics there are difficulties because the entrenched powers in the Chancery office often have a very different agenda than providing a Catholic education that is orthodox.

    My solution involves recruitment of good traditional orders of religious sisters and brothers to come back in and teach as their service to the Church. This would lower tuition costs and put the habit wearing religious back in the public eye.

    lastly, the principal who refuted you sounds like a dyed in the wool sophist to me. What successful business today markets itself by obfuscating its true identity and supressing its most powerful asset? Sounds to me like he wants to change the Catholic school’s product.

Leave a Reply