Catholic Exchange

What Colin Powell Didn’t Say

Sunday, October 19 brought a huge surprise from retired Army General Colin Powell. General Powell publicly endorsed Senator Barack Obama for president.

America trusts Colin Powell. He was Secretary of State under George W. Bush from 2001 through 2005, and he is a Republican. His persona exudes integrity, trustworthiness, and depth. As such, this endorsement may very well cause today’s undecided voters to cast their ballots for Barack Obama.

General Powell’s announcement was made in a seven-minute monologue on MSNBC’s Meet The Press. After a bit of back and forth about what our next president will face, which focused mostly on the economy, host Tom Brokaw turned the floor over to Colin Powell with this lead-in:

General Powell, last year you made a campaign contribution to Senator McCain. You have met twice, at least, with Barack Obama. Are you prepared to make a public declaration of which of these two candidates you’re prepared to support?

Take note of that lead: Brokaw mentioned that Colin Powell has met “at least” twice with Barack Obama. Yet General Powell’s answer gave quite a different picture of his relationship with Senator Obama. Right out of the box, General Powell stated that he’s “gotten to know Mr. Obama quite well over the past two years.” That means that from the very moment in October, 2006 that Obama announced he might think about a run for the presidency, General Powell started to get to know him. This seems quite unusual considering what a long shot Obama’s candidacy seemed at first. And it certainly doesn’t line up with Tom Brokaw’s unchallenged statement that Powell has met with Obama “twice, at least.” So how well does Colin Powell really know Barack Obama?

What is certainly true is that twice during this Meet The Press interview Colin Powell said that either Barack Obama or John McCain would be “a good president.” This will get little play in the mainstream media, but it’s an important fact to point out to your undecided friends. So if General Powell believes that either Obama or McCain would be a good president, why will he be casting his personal vote for Barack Obama? General Powell gave the following reasons.

He said that McCain seemed to be “a little unsure” of how to solve our current economic crisis, but that Obama showed “intellectual vigor.” Is this the same John McCain who was willing to suspend his campaign for the presidency in order to perform his duties as a senator? Who was willing to do the work he’s being paid for? Who, according to a first person account, was a voice of reason and sobriety in the September White House meeting on the economic bailout? Does General Powell not remember that Senator Obama seemed oddly detached from the senate economic bailout debate, despite still drawing his senate salary, stating that he’d come back to Washington only “if I [could] be helpful”? This didn’t ring true.

General Powell stressed the importance of Senator Obama’s communication skills. But all the praise of Obama’s “rhetorical abilities” and “intellectual vigor” may merely have been smoke and mirrors. A golden thread wound through General Powell’s seven minute explanation of his vote: the Republican Party has become too conservative for him.

He declared that Sarah Palin’s presence on the ticket signals a rightward shift in the Republican Party that was not to his liking. And in an odd tribute to Hillary Clinton, General Powell claimed that Barack Obama reaches out to “all villages” because “all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values.” Whisps of “clinging to religion” started to permeate the air, and General Powell quickly confirmed that small town values were not to his liking. He point blank stated, “I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that’s what we’d be looking at in a McCain administration.”

So there it was. You had to hear what wasn’t said. Pro-choice Colin Powell is endorsing pro-choice Barack Obama because he doesn’t want two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court.

Not one word about national defense was spoken by the most famous Army general in this country. Not one word was spoken about the dangers of Obama’s socialist ideology of “spreading the wealth.” And though General Powell praised John McCain for being “as non-discriminatory as any one I know,” not one word was spoken about McCain’s bravery, sound judgment, or military experience in these dangerous times.

Despite General Powell’s stated opinion that either McCain or Obama could be a good president, it all came down to conservative appointments to the Supreme Court. This is an important lesson for all of us. Choosing Supreme Court judges is one of the most powerful acts of a president. President McCain would appoint conservative justices, President Obama would not. Because of this, the lives of many of our future citizens hang in the balance.

Comments

14 responses to “What Colin Powell Didn’t Say”

  1. Cooky642 Avatar
    Cooky642

    It’s interesting to me that no one else has responded to this article. Hello? Am I the only one awake?

    General Powell USED to have my complete support and admiration. If he’d run in our current election cycle, I’d have voted for him. I look forward to a black President…..just not Mr. Obama. I’m glad to have discovered my error.

  2. […] Original post by Toni Collins […]

  3. Grace Harman Avatar
    Grace Harman

    “Conservativism” means being moral, pro-life, and pro-American.
    I voted for Ken Blackwell (a truly moral, pro-life black man) for Governor of Ohio (but he lost the election to the Democrat).
    I would vote for Alan Keyes if he was a MAJOR party candidate for president.
    I can NOT vote for Obama BECAUSE of his support of abortion, infanticide, “gay” marriage, and socialized medicine (which will cause rationing, “screening out” and eventually FORCED euthanasia of the most vulnerable -expensive- people). It has Nothing to do with his skin color and Everything to do with his lack of respect for human lives and rejection of God’s Laws, plus an anti-American and possibly an anti-“white” attitude. If he wins, millions more of innocent lives will be lost by (racially oriented) abortion and purposeful euthanasia.
    His idea of “re-distribution” of wealth will cause huge tax increases and more economic problems. His “change” will mean a total commitment to the killing of all innocent and vulnerable people, and promotion of a socialist or even atheistic society. This is NOT a GOOD kind of change.

  4. irish_2171 Avatar
    irish_2171

    The whole thing makes me sick. Anyone see this?

    http://thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama's Abortion Extremism_.xml

  5. elkabrikir Avatar
    elkabrikir

    Hello Cooky!

    Last year at this time I would have been awake at 12:51 AM , but, I’m NOT pregnant! And the baby has learned to sleep until noon…….so I’m just getting to my morning routine.

    First, Colin Powell’s cagey positioning was disingenuous, predictable, and rather boring. He must not be making much on the “speaking circuit”.

    Most people could care less that he is a distinguished general or else John McCain’s almost 6 years as a POW would mean something. And Obama’s lack of service, (excepting lip service) combined with cocaine use would influence votes.

    Anybody who thinks about these issues knows that Powell is as pro choice as they come and was so even while serving the Bush administration.

    I think his puny endorsement is about two things in addition to support for abortion.

    First: Payback!!!!!!! He’s mad as a fire ant for playing the Dupe at the UN.

    Second: Race. Pure and simple his endorsement of Obama, is Powell’s embracing of their common African heritage. On Oct 14th during a celebration of Africa, at Royal Albert HallI in London, Powell had this to say to the crowd after he danced hip-hop to revolting rap lyrics,

    “It took a lot of people struggling to bring me to this point in history. I didn’t just drop out of the sky, people came from my continent in chains.”

    As soon as I read that quote I knew who he was supporting. Interestingly, the last phrase is deleted from some media reports. Here’s a link to an article regarding the event. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7670788.stm

    I do not know why African Americans continue to sell their soul for a pot of lentils. It is for freedom that we are all free (in Christ most particularly). However, the black genocide in this country elucidates the continued slavery of blacks in America. Only Master has changed since 1865. go to http://www.blackgenocide.org

    Way to go Grace!!!! I’ve heard Alan Keyes speak. He is brilliant and holy…but not a pandering opportunist who speaks to the worst in people.

    Obviously I have had a cup of coffee already!!!

  6. marcey Avatar
    marcey

    Toni,

    I’m not sure why you think this was a “huge surprise.” Unless you were being sarcastic. It is simply more of the same from the obama camp and yet another reminder that many people don’t seem to care about the subterfuge that is the foundation of the obama platform. I’m not sure why that is, but it is.

  7. Richard Bell Avatar
    Richard Bell

    Oddly enough, the fact that McCain is unsure about how to handle the economy is more comforting than Obama’s intellectual vigor. The whole mess came about because the people collectively paid billions of dollars to predict what the economy will do (so that their clients collectively make trillions) got it so thoroughly wrong. We already know how a president with certainty can start with the wrong idea and repeatedly compound the error by trying to fix a flawed solution, instead of trying another way to fix the problem.

    While both men may have fixes for the mortgage crisis, neither can fix the liquidity issues. The credit crunch is a global problem and the US federal government has not run a surplus in decades. The Federal Reserve is trying to solve the credit crisis by borrowing money– who are they going to borrow it from?

    In the recent past, there were plenty of people with lots of unspent american dollars (the people who receive US trade deficit dollars) and they needed an investment that would not require them to trade US dollars for other currency (depressing the value of the US dollar, which they continued to collect in large amounts), so they bought US government debt. Now, as the US federal deficit is beginning to outpace the US trade imbalance and americans are starting to buy less stuff (which will reduce the trade deficit), the US treasury will have to sell US debt on the strength of the return on investment– we can expect the Fed to start jacking up the rates, as soon as the trade deficit dollars are accounted for.

    The US economic woes in one sentence: Too many american people started spending like the american government.

    They all got burned when their credit maxed out and they could no longer take out another home equity loan. If huge piles of credit do not start appearing on someone’s balance sheet, the US federal government is going to hit the same wall, as they try to float bonds to cover the bailout package.

    If this does not finally force the US federal system to spend only as much money as it collects in taxes, nothing else will.

  8. gk Avatar
    gk

    bummer. Colin is good except on life. So, therefore, he ainte no good. Point made. Thanks for clarifying.

    GK

  9. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    I noticed that the General stated that Governor Palin did not have the experience to be President, but he gave no examples of Mr. Obama’s experience. Apparently, running for political office trumps winning important political offices and performing in them with an 80% approval rating.

  10. Toni Collins Avatar
    Toni Collins

    Thank you, everyone, for your excellent responses. I appreciate them.

    Marcey– I was honestly shocked when Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama; I wasn’t being sarcastic at all. In fact, the first two people with whom I shared General Powell’s endorsement were just as shocked as I. We all thought that Colin Powell’s concern for national defense would transcend any other issue.

    elkabrikir– I. like you, thought that this endorsement might be a payback. But then I read this CNN transcript:
    Reporter: [W]on’t it [your endorsement] be taken by some as a repudiation of the Iraq war?
    Powell: I don’t know why. The Iraq war is the Iraq war. We now see that things are a lot better in Iraq. … I’m well aware of the role I played. My role has been very, very straightforward. I wanted to avoid a war. The president agreed with me. We tried to do that. We couldn’t get it through the U.N. and when the president made the decision, I supported that decision. And I’ve never blinked from that. I’ve never said I didn’t support a decision to go to war. (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/19/powell.transcript/)

    Until I read this interview, the media certainly had me believing that General Powell regretted his role in front of the U.N. I now think that must have been media fantasy. And it makes me doubly sure that Colin Powell’s endorsement of Barack Obama came down to the issue of abortion.

    Again, thank you all for your comments on the article.

    Toni Collins

  11. goral Avatar
    goral

    As Pat Buchanan put it, Powell is just playing tribal politics.
    As elkabrikir put it, African-Americans keep selling their soul for a pot of lentils.
    This is not a big surprise and it only matters because it’s about Obama, Powell and the media. It has no weight whatsoever to affect anything.
    Did the two-faced general change the mind of any Af.-Am. who was not already salivating at the prospect of eating lentils?
    Did the boring general change the mind of any other American who was already not in the bag for Obama?
    The media in their deceitful manner overplayed this non-event to leave an impression that any of this actually matters.

    One has to give some credit to the general for not yet changing his name to an African sounding one. Let’s pray that he won’t be doing that in a future Obama administration.

  12. elkabrikir Avatar
    elkabrikir

    Toni,

    thanks for the ongoing discussion. I do agree that abortion is a key reason for Powell’s endorsement of Obama. However, I stand by my statement that it was also “payback” time.

    Here follows a Powell quote from a 2005 interview with Barbara Walters.

    I’m the one who presented it to the world, and (it) will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It is painful now,” Powell said in an interview with Barbara Walters on ABC-News. (Related story: The story of WMDs that weren’t)

    The presentation by the soldier-diplomat to the world body in February 2003 lent considerable credibility to President Bush’s case against Iraq and for going to war to remove President Saddam Hussein.

    In the speech, Powell said he had relied on information he received at Central Intelligence Agency briefings. He said Thursday that then-director George Tenet “believed what he was giving to me was accurate.”

    But, Powell said, “the intelligence system did not work well.”

    “There were some people in the intelligence community who knew at the time that some of those sources were not good, and shouldn’t be relied upon, and they didn’t speak up,” Powell said.

    “That devastated me,” he said.
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-09-08-powell-iraq_x.htm

    What you posted above is not in contradiction to the part of the Dupe that he played.

    By the way, I totally rejected the “need” to go to war with Iraq in 2003. If a country needs a “run up” to the war convincing people of its legitimacy, then the war probably is wrong. However, we’re there now and must see it through to the end.

  13. Jeff Reser Avatar
    Jeff Reser

    Marcey, with all due respect, this endorsement has been talked about for at least a month. It should shock no one and yes, it’s all about abortion. He would rather allow the murder of innocent babies than let them grow up to be soldiers like himself. Isn’t it sad?

  14. stutmann9 Avatar
    stutmann9

    I think that Colin Powell was offered something from the Obama camp to make this endorsement because they needed to recover from the Joe the Plumber blunder. General Powell seemed almost like he was reading from a script or coached about what he was going to say. I bet they offered him an important position in Obama’s cabinet or an offer that he couldn’t refuse monetarily. He had nothing to lose, (except his soul, but that probably didn’t even matter to him) and everything to gain by making the endorsement for Obama. His betrayal will be infamous forever. Guilty of leading so many astray. God have mercy!

Leave a Reply