Catholic Exchange

The Eucharist: Corpus Christi?

The Catholic Church teaches the doctrine of transubstantiation, namely, that in the Eucharist, the communion wafer and the altar wine are transformed and really become the body and blood of Jesus Christ.  Have you ever met anyone who has found this Catholic doctrine to be a bit hard to take?

If so, you shouldn’t be surprised.  When Jesus spoke about eating his flesh and drinking his blood in John 6, his words met with less than an enthusiastic reception.  How can this man give us his flesh to eat? (V 52).  This is a hard saying who can listen to it? (V60).  In fact so many of his disciples abandoned him over this that Jesus had to ask the twelve if they also planned to quit.  It is interesting that Jesus did not run after his disciples saying, Don’t go, I was just speaking metaphorically!

How did the early Church interpret these challenging words of Jesus?  Interesting fact.  One charge the pagan Romans lodged against the Christians was cannibalism.  Why?  You guessed it.  They heard that this sect regularly met to eat and drink human blood.  Did the early Christians say: wait a minute, it’s only a symbol!?  Not at all.  When trying to explain the Eucharist to the Roman Emperor around 155 AD, St. Justin did not mince his words: “For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Sav­ior being incarnate by God’s word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the word of prayer which comes from him . . . is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus.

Not many Christians questioned the real presence of Christ’s body and blood in the Eucharist till the Middle Ages.  In trying to explain how bread and wine are changed into the body and blood of Christ, several theologians went astray and needed to be corrected by Church authority.  Then St. Thomas Aquinas came along and offered an explanation that became classic.  In all change that we observe in this life, he teaches, appearances change, but deep down, the essence of a thing stays the same.  Example: if, in a fit of mid-life crisis, I traded my mini-van for a Ferrari, abandoned my wife and 5 kids to be beach bum, got tanned, bleached my hair blonde, spiked it, buffed up at the gym, and took a trip to the plastic surgeon, I’d look a lot different on the surface. But for all my trouble, deep down I’d still substantially be the same old baby boomer.

St. Thomas said the Eucharist is the one instance of change we encounter in this world that is exactly the opposite.  The appearances of bread and wine stay the same, but the very essence or substance of these realities, which can’t be detected by a microscope, is totally transformed.  What was once bread and wine are now Christ’s body and blood.   A handy word was coined to describe this unique change.  Transformation of the sub-stance, what stands-under the surface, came to be called transubstantiation.

What makes this happen?  The power of God’s Spirit and Word.  After praying for the Spirit to come (epiklesis), the priest, who stands in the place of Christ, repeats the words of the God-man: This is my Body, This is my Blood.  Sounds to me like Genesis 1: the mighty wind (read Spirit) whips over the surface of the water and God’s Word resounds. Let there be light and there was light.  It is no harder to believe in transubstantiation than to believe in Creation.

But why did Jesus arrange for this transformation of bread and wine?  Because he intended another kind of transformation.  The bread and wine are transformed into the Body and Blood of Christ which are, in turn, meant to transform us.  Ever hear the phrase: you are what you eat? The Lord desires us to be transformed from a motley crew of imperfect individuals into the Body of Christ, come to full stature.

Our evangelical brethren often speak of an intimate, personal relationship with Jesus.  But I ask you, how much more personal and intimate can you get?  We receive the Lord’s body into our physical bodies that we may become him whom we receive!

Such an awesome gift deserves its own feast. And that’s why, back in the days of Thomas Aquinas and St. Francis of Assisi, the Pope decided to institute the Feast of Corpus Christi.

image: Renata Sedmakova / Shutterstock.com

Comments

5 responses to “The Eucharist: Corpus Christi?”

  1. MarcAlcan Avatar
    MarcAlcan

    Our evangelical brethren often speak of an intimate, personal relationship with Jesus. But I ask you, how much more personal and intimate can you get? We receive the Lord’s body into our physical bodies that we may become him whom we receive!

    It is true that we do receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ in the Eucharist. But if you poll Catholics, most of them will not have much clue about that.

    Christ wants to be intimate with us and so gives us Himself. But do we really take that to heart? Do you see many Catholics taking that to heart? Do they really believe that they have a very personal relationship with Jesus.

    I like this to a married couple who engaged in the marital act. One of them may be truly giving his/her self to the union. But the other could be completely disengaged and just going through the motions – probably even thinking of some other partner. The man who goes to a prostitute can hardly be said to be having a personal relationship with her.

    The evangelicals are quite right. We need to have a deeper personal relationship with Christ. Just because we go to communion does not mean that we do. It is evidenced by the chattering before and after the Mass, the blasé manner with which we participate in the liturgy and the way we live lives as if God does not matter. Sadly, we see that in many so called “Catholics”.

  2. WSquared Avatar
    WSquared

    The Evangelicals are right in a sense, but they need to go deeper: what does this “intimate, personal relationship with Jesus” consist of, who initiates it, and through what means?

    Simply because many Catholics do not treat that relationship with the respect that they should does not mean that the relationship does not exist. We don’t judge the relationship by those who neglect it, but by those who actually take Jesus up on the offer: the saints. Because they understand the implications of what He Himself is giving them.

    We need to have a deeper personal relationship with Christ. Just because we go to communion does not mean that we do.

    Because part of maintaining that relationship– i.e. Communion with Christ– involves one’s attitude to sacramental Confession. Why do we expect the Eucharist to work effectively in our lives if we insist on not availing ourselves of the very means that the Lord uses to unclog what’s impeding the flow of grace?

    If we want a deeper, personal relationship with Jesus Christ, why don’t we want Him to take away our sins?

  3. MarcAlcan Avatar
    MarcAlcan

    Simply because many Catholics do not treat that relationship with the respect that they should does not mean that the relationship does not exist. We don’t judge the relationship by those who neglect it, but by those who actually take Jesus up on the offer: the saints. Because they understand the implications of what He Himself is giving them.

    And how many Catholics would fall in that category now? Maybe 20%?

    Because part of maintaining that relationship– i.e. Communion with Christ– involves one’s attitude to sacramental Confession.

    Exactly! Have you noticed the line at confession recently? You get a smattering of people at the confessional but the line at communion is a mile long. Everyone gets up to receive. What has happened? Have we suddenly all become saints that we no longer have to go to confession anymore so we can just sally forth to communion? At my friends parish, divorced and remarried and openly cohabiting homosexuals are EHMCs!
    This is my whole point. Few Catholics take communion seriously these days. If you take a poll, I doubt that you get 50% believing absolutely in the doctrine of the Real Presence.

  4. JMC Avatar
    JMC

    Doc, you have a gift for clarification. While I always understood intellectually that it was the essence, not the substance, that changed, somehow I never drew the parallel you do so clearly: The bread and wine changes in essence so that Christ can change OUR essence. What an eye-opener.

  5. nonoy bayohin Avatar
    nonoy bayohin

    Wow! Thank you so much catholicexchance.com you are one of the God-sent messengers in social media, I am personally greatful to my Lord Jesus that in spite of the growing materialism in this area still there are people like you who continue to inspiringly inform people out there about our catholic faith and defend the Church with passion. I am touched by your passion in this ministry because I feel we are not alone in defending our faith which is very much original and ancient. I am one of your fans catholic exchange because I realize that through the exchange of ideas and comments below the article clarify our true faith. One thing I can promise with you is the prayer. I promise to help you touched and convert more people in our catholic faith in the world through this social media by prayers and sharing your articles in facebook and twitter. God bless!

Leave a Reply