With Barack Obama’s second inauguration, liberals are touting an altogether new epoch: the end of the Reagan era.The End of the Reagan Era?
With Barack Obama’s second inauguration, liberals are touting an altogether new epoch: the end of the Reagan era.Comments
2 responses to “The End of the Reagan Era?”
-
Whew ! For a minute there, I thought you were going to conclude that we’re doomed to a liberal takeover. I think it all comes down to $$$. Just a little investigating into how much is invested into liberal ideologies by people like George Sorros & the like, shows that this is where the power is. People may disagree with certain tenets of the left, but if it “SEEMS” more likely one group will bring food & medical assistance to them, they will overlook ideologies that only deal with future bills – not current situations. [Bk of Revelation points to a time when “the children of God” will be hindered in buying & selling.] Do you suppose there could ever be a paradigm that practises the Jewish tradition of erasing debts every 7 years ?
-
Politics 101. Two key factors are personal likability and philosophy burnout. The voters go “left right” back and forth because they simply get tired of the same philosophy after 8 years (or in Reagan’s – Bush’s case 12 years). Couple that w/ the candidates being very adept at “running to the middle” in the general election to garner the swing voters (those w/out firm convictions or principles). Finally, it’s a popularity contest. Who do I want to see in my face on TV for the next 4 years? Who do I “like” the most between these two as a person? Obama has a lot of charisma like Reagan. That’s why two very different political philosophy’s have prospered. Both left and right have their “core” constituency, but charisma is what carries the SWING voters. That’s it. Not rocket science. Ask the political architects. They raise the marketing monies and then create the product that will sell to the swingers. You’re confusing principle/core voters with product marketing to swingers. That’s why parties and politicians work so hard to find and build “coalitions” that will get them elected. Conservatives won’t be successful again until they (a) find a candidate that can unite both core and enough “swingers” to have a majority of the electoral college and (b) the opponent is less popular in likability. The conservatives have an advantage going into 2016: Liberal philosophy burnout will be high after 8 years. Swingers will be interested, more open to “change” as long as they candidate is “more likable”. The politicians know this. That’s why so many “good candidates” for a party don’t run against a sitting president. Odds are strongly against winning. Those are the ingredients for American political gumbo.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.