Catholic Exchange

The Conversion of Saul

Among the Church’s persecutors, Saul was singular in his zeal, unabashed in his purpose. He went about “breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord” (Acts 9:1). Ravaging the Church, and “entering house after house, he dragged off men and women and committed them to prison” (Acts 8:3). The mere mention of Saul’s name was enough to strike fear in the heart of those who followed Jesus’ way (see Acts 9:13-14).

From his earliest days, Saul had sense of divine calling. His birthplace, Tarsus, was a bustling coastal city and administrative center for the Roman province of Cilicia (what is now southeastern Turkey). Like his father, Saul was a tradesman — a tent­maker. Like his father, he held Roman citizenship, a coveted privilege. Like his fa­ther, he observed the doctrine and discipline of the Pharisees.

his article is from the Catholic Viewer’s Guide to AD: The Bible Continues (airs Sundays at 9/8c). Read more of this fascinating history in Ministers and Martyrs.

A prodigy, he went early to Jerusalem to study in the great center of Jewish learn­ing, where he studied under the renowned rabbi Gamaliel. He also fell under the influence of radical ideas. Some teachers believed that faithful observance of the Torah was the pre-condition of God’s saving action — and that sectarians like Jesus were discouraging people from keeping the Law. Jesus, after all, had repeatedly vio­lated the laws regarding the Sabbath — healing people, encouraging His disciples to pick grain, and so on. He had even declared Himself to be “Lord of the Sabbath” (Mt. 12:8). thus putting Himself in the place of God. Saul believed that Jesus’ disciples should be

given a choice. They should adopt a strict obser-vance of the Law — or they should die, so that they would not bring divine judgment down on the rest of the nation.

The disciples fled Jerusalem, but they were not cowed into silence. St. Luke reports that “those who were scattered went about preach­ing the word” (Acts 8:4). This new persecution, like the death of Jesus before it, just exacer­bated the problem for the Jerusalem author­ities. Wherever the disciples fled, they made new disciples.

The growth of the Church surely fueled Saul’s fury. He believed he was on a di­vine mission — “as to zeal a persecutor of the church, as to righteousness under the law blameless” (Phil. 3:6). As he traveled to bring the persecution to Syria, however, something happened.

Struck to the ground, he received a revelation from God. And he learned that Je­sus was the Messiah he had sought. He ceased to be a persecutor of Jesus and began to be a disciple. He converted, but he did not abandon the religion of Israel. Long after his incident on the road to Damascus, he made it clear that he was still a Jew (Acts 21:39) and still a Pharisee (Acts 23:6). The people of Israel would always be, for him, “my brethren, my kinsmen by race” (Rom. 9:3). Accepting the Messiah was not something alien to his Jewishness. Indeed, for all the time he was a Pharisee, it was what he had been waiting for.

Editor’s note: This article is the seventh part in a 12-part series exploring the Catholic background behind NBC’s A.D. The Bible Continues (watch on Sundays at 9/8c). Check back each Friday for a new entry. As well, you can get The Catholic Viewers Guide for A.D. as well as Ministers and Martyrs, or order both as a set to save 25%.

Comments

3 responses to “The Conversion of Saul”

  1. noelfitz Avatar
    noelfitz

    I love the articles by Mike Aquilina as they are solid and thought-provoking. However I have just returned from a week-end conference on ‘Martn Luther and Catholic Theology’, and am confused.

    Reading here “that sectarians like Jesus were discouraging people from keeping the Law” has added to my reflections. The conference stressed that we are saved by the merits of Jesus, not by our works, or even or our acceptance of grace. Great is the mystery of our religion.

  2. johnnysc Avatar
    johnnysc

    You are confused and make the mistake of many by not considering context. The law that was talked about in your example is the old covenant law. Jesus himself tells us we must pick up our cross daily and follow Him. He tells us if we love Him we will obey His commandments. And of course St. James tells us that Faith without works is a dead faith. If you are getting your theology from Martin Luther you will be just as confused as he was.

  3. TerryC Avatar
    TerryC

    Our salvation is a very nuanced proposition. Certainly our salvation is dependent upon the salvitic actions of Christ in the Crucifixion. However while all were saved by Christ, we as creatures given free will by God are capable of rejecting salvation. The freely given grace with which God blesses us can help us to accept salvation.
    No deed by us is capable of earning salvation, but certainly we can through our deeds reject salvation.
    Likewise, if we accept salvation, then our actions, that is our works, should reflect this state.
    Luther’s beliefs were certainly closer to Catholic theology than the beliefs of his spiritual descendants in the present day Protestant groups; particularly his beliefs on the Real Presence and Mary.

Leave a Reply