Catholic Exchange

Rubbing Salt in the Wound

In the wake of the mass slaughter at Virginia Tech, National Review's John Derbyshire labored to help grind the faces of survivors by writing:

Where was the spirit of self-defense here? … It's not like this was Rambo, hosing the place down with automatic weapons. He had two handguns for goodness' sake—one of them reportedly a .22.

At the very least, count the shots and jump him reloading or changing hands. Better yet, just jump him. Handguns aren't very accurate, even at close range. I shoot mine all the time at the range, and I still can't hit squat. I doubt this guy was any better than I am. And even if hit, a .22 needs to find something important to do real damage—your chances aren't bad.

Yes, yes, I know it's easy to say these things: but didn't the heroes of Flight 93 teach us anything? As the cliche goes—and like most cliches. It's true—none of us knows what he'd do in a dire situation like that. I hope, however, that if I thought I was going to die anyway, I'd at least take a run at the guy.

 Permit me to answer.  The heroes of Flight 93 taught me that ex-Christian Derbyshire believes the pagan error of Stoicism: the notion you can do always what you can do sometimes. It is an error not very far from the far graver error of Pelagianism: the belief that you can pull yourself up to sainthood by your own bootstraps.

The heroes of Flight 93 are remembered because they did something exceptional and rare, not because they typify the norm. They represent not the ordinary level of American Can-Do Courage, but an act of heroism extraordinary anywhere in human history.  And they also had some distinct advantages over the people at VT. They had time to reflect, to realize the full gravity of their situation, to realize there was no escape, to coordinate with others, to gather themselves emotionally and mentally, and to formulate a desperate plan—even to say their goodbyes. And they were up against box cutters and men distracted with trying to fly an airplane.  At VT, death burst in the door and opened fire.

A few years ago two military jets collided and crashed at an air show in Stuttgart, killing several people on the ground. We have excellent videos of this because, not just the cameraman, but most of the crowd stood stock still as the fireball engulfed its victims. Why? Because planes don't crash and kill people right in front of you. You don't move. You don't know what to do. Nothing in your life prepared you for this. 

It's moments like this when I especially prize the Catholic revelation for its mercy. I honor and revere the heroes of Flight 93. But I don't hold the victims and survivors of Virginia Tech to that standard and I think it cruel of Derbyshire to burden the survivors with his pagan guilt as they grapple with their entirely normal and human actions in a crisis. St. Paul himself tells us that acts of heroic self-sacrifice are not the norm and never have been when he notes of Christ's self-sacrifice, "Why, one will hardly die for a righteous man — though perhaps for a good man one will dare even to die.  But God shows his love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us." (Romans 5:7-8).

Likewise, if there's anything that scripture pounds into our heads concerning huge promises of courage and deliberate action in crisis situations, it's the story of Peter's triple denial of Christ at cock crow. In a moment of extreme pain and shame, Derbyshire uses the power of his pen to suggest that he would not have failed. Oh sure, he qualifies it with "none of us knows what he'd do…" blather. But the point is that he picks a moment when survivors are reeling with shock and shame to cluck his tongue at them. He'd be far better employed using it to clean their boots.

The Church began with the boast "Though everyone else deny you, I will never deny you," ringing in its ears. Derbyshire's brave words, boldly punched into a laptop from the comfort of his cubicle, are cheap indeed. What survivors need far more than the scolding of a pagan Stoic is the mercy of the Christ who forgave Peter's failure in a crisis and gave him a chance to cooperate with grace in his redemption.

Some will complain that this makes weakness, cowardice and sin the default position of the human race. It most certainly does. Didn't we learn anything when they taught about original sin in Sunday school? That's why we need a Savior—a merciful one.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    John Derbyshire incorrectly applies the Flight 93 scenario to this one. They are not the same. In the former there was time to consider multiple resolution scenarios, in the VT case there was only a second or two to make a choice.

    A few years ago I had read about something called the "fireman's scenario" which studied firefighters to determine how many different strategies they considered when they approached a particular fire. The answer was only one. Hence, it emphasized the importance of training so that the one choice would be the right one.

    When I was in the military I was trained that if ambushed the highest survival choice was to charge the ambushers which, of course, went against my own instincts to hide. The VT students were not military trained and thus did not have any experience to fall back on during this ambush. Had Cho Seung-Hui attacked a room full of Marines the outcome would have been much different not because of a difference in courage, but in training.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thanks Mark : )

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Derbyshire is quick to place blame and JohnCWalker is very reluctant to do so. But they both agree that if people had reacted differently that it is possible that less people would have died at VT. We're not in a position where we can know enough to decide on the culpability of anyone who was there. But at the very least it should sadden us that lives could have been saved if a small handful of students had reacted differently.

     Mr Shea wrote that "some will complain that this makes weakness, cowardice and sin the default position of the human race.It most certainly does. Didn't we learn anything when they taught about original sin in Sunday school? That's why we need a Savior—a merciful one." This is true, but the fact that we have a Savior should not lead us to take weakness, cowardice, and sin less seriously. It should lead us to take them more seriously because Christ's death shows the horrible cost of our sins.

    We probably should not react with anger towards the individuals who did not make an attempt to stop the VT shooter. It does seem appropriate to react with anger to the situation itself. How could it be the case that out of a builiding full of students a handful couldn't be found who somehow knew how to react appropriately? The shootings are made even more horrible because it would have taken comparatively little for this incident to be much less severe than it was.

    I'm a seminarian who had taken part in the Army's Chaplain Candidate training. Because of what I've learned from conversations with other military personnel and from what I've read about combat I can say that my most likely reaction if I had been there would have been to try to rush the shooter, and if there was any time to do so try to gather a few others to do it with me. I can't say for certain that I actually would have done this, but if fear had kept me from doing so it would have been a tragic failure on my part.

    Deacon Ryan Larson

    1Lt US Army Reserves (Chaplain Candidate)

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mr. Shea strikes again, and again without logic.  Mr. Derbyshire was correct in his assessment- WHERE HAVE ALL THE REAL MEN GONE?????????  Other than that poor instructor who SACRIFICED his life for those of his students, what males (I would not call them men) defended the lives of others in this attack?  What about the new breed of super women, foisted upon society by the feminazis?  The females of this generation eschew all that is feminine, yet they can't stop one intruder?  

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Darkness has gathered below this article.  Come on, stop abusing the dead.  Reality is the psycho killer had nothing to live for and he had guns, untrained victims and surprise to help him.  Stop picking at this wound.  It shows lack of respect, pride and presumption.  We were not there.  It is a shame some of us were not there who might have been able to stop it sooner.  But we were not there.

    Mark Shea's point wasn't that no one in the same exact situation would not have been able to bum rush the psycho killer.  And no one knows if anyone actually tried and the psycho got lucky and stopped them.  Mark's point was that we should watch our tounges when human life is involved.  We should weigh our words.  We should try to understand what the survivors are going through and let them bury their loved ones.  When the blood has dried, if someone wants to work up something like this, it might be appropriate so that we learn something for the future. 

    But, if all we have to say is negative hogwash then we should clam up for a while and respect life and death and a tragedy that impacts an entire country.  And I think Mark said it best when he wrote "But the point is that he picks a moment when survivors are reeling with shock and shame to cluck his tongue at them. He'd be far better employed using it to clean their boots."

     

    GK – God is good!

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    trainwife1962, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for your rudeness!  I am a 25 year old young woman, and I'm proud of my God-given femininity.  I have many other young women among my acquaintance who are grateful for their femininity and don't need to be "feminazis" as you term them.  I know many wonderful Catholic young men who are strong men.  Is there a problem in our society with masculinity and femininity?  Absolutely, but you are not using logic when you cite that as the reason the death toll was so high.  Before making a broad-sweeping generalization, it is wise to pause – that brand of statement is rarely part of a wise decision, especially when stated with extreme emotion.

    Mark Shea did not state that cowardice is acceptable.  But criticizing it in this situation is wrong for many reasons.  Here are a few reasons I would mention:

    • These students were victims and did not cause the killings – they were not culpable for the crimes; the shooter was.
    • Just because the shootings were happening in one area of the building does not mean that the entire building understood what was happening.  People are not endowed with God's omniscience.  So, most individuals were probably faced with a short amount of time to determine their actions.  Not everyone is given the gift of thinking quickly, especially under the most extreme of pressures.
    • There are other stories of people who took initiative and made sacrifices besides the professor you mention.  For example, two young men barricaded a door with desks and kept the shooter from entering that room.  I believe they saved everyone in that room.  Do they fit your definition of "real men"?

    As a final note, don't point fingers unless you are willing to handle criticism.  Would a truly feminine woman SHOUT, treat others rudely, and be so very disrespectful as you were in your response?  Something to ponder…

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I teach in a Catholic high school. I immediately raised this point: What if everyone, enmasse, threw tables, chairs, books, whatever they had, screaming at the top of their lungs, as they lurched toward him.

    I have attempted to engage the conversation of whether or not this reaction could be learned through training. It seems that it could. This is not to cast a shadow on the victims in Virginia, only to see our way clear to less casualties in similar situations.

    I think the conversation must address the Christian issue of no greater love than giving one's life; not all will be called to this sacrifice. But to those who would, let the training begin.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Here is a good piece about how to prepare a school for such attacks. But there are no guarantees. It is the exceptional who run toward the sound of gunfire — that's why we give them medals.

    And Mr. Shea is right — the Church established by Jesus came into being with "Even though everyone else should deny You, I will never deny You!" ringing very recently in its ears.

    And yet He still loves us so much in our weakness that He willingly suffered and died to call us all to be with Him.

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Protect the Rock,

    Thanks for the link to the article from Col. Grossman's  website. It's because I've read his books that I have any confidence that there's a chance I might react in a helpful manner in a situation like this,

    Deacon Ryan

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Thank you, thank you, thank you Mark Shea. You are the voice of reason against John Derbyshire’s ravings. Thanks too for GK’s and Princess P’s and Davedecleene’s compassionate words, as well as ProtecttheRock’s. It is a cruel person to call teenagers “cowardly” for not comprehending what was going on and “rushing” the gunman as they looked up at the barrel of a gun that was about to be shot at close range. One wonders what he would do in a similar situation, say, sitting at a fast food restaurant or even a WalMart, with a handgun barrel against his forehead. Talk about blaming the victim(s)! From the mother of a VT Engineering student who just came home for the summer. We are still grieving. God bless all coping with the shocking losses. So many of us are still trying to wrap our minds around what happened, even weeks after the violence . . .

Leave a Reply