Catholic Exchange

NY Times Says Pro-Abortion Will Lead to Democrat Defeat

One of the most liberal newspapers in the country, the New York Times, has run an op-ed piece that argues that by standing immovably by the "pro-choice" position, the Democratic Party and presidential candidates are alienating the fundamental voter demographic that might ensure the party victory in 2008.

In a piece entitled "Why Pro-Choice is a Bad Choice for Democrats," Melinda Henneberger (author of "If They Only Listened to Us") points out that the common belief of the liberal Democrat — that abortion is a settled issue and is only opposed by an "extreme" minority — is false.

"Over 18 months, I traveled to 20 states listening to women of all ages, races, tax brackets and points of view speak at length on the issues they care about heading into '08," writes Henneberger. "They convinced me that the conventional wisdom was wrong about the last presidential contest, that Democrats did not lose support among women because ‘security moms' saw President Bush as the better protector against terrorism. What first-time defectors mentioned most often was abortion."

Many die-hard women Democratic Party members, says Henneberger, have been alienated by the party by a void of candidates that are on-side with what they perceive to be an issue of life and death, a void that is filled by Republican candidates, such as Fred Thompson.

Instead the Democratic Party must begin to win back pro-life voters, says Henneberger, in the first place by giving such voters "respect." "As it turns out," she writes, "you cannot call people extremists and expect them to vote for you. But real respect would require an understanding that what supporters of abortion rights genuinely see as a hard-earned freedom, opponents genuinely see as a self-inflicted wound and — though I can feel some of you tensing as you read this — a human rights issue comparable to slavery."

While Henneberger stops short of saying that perhaps Democrats might consider actually siding with pro-life advocates on the issue, she does point out that the liberal devotion to the "right" to abortion on demand in all circumstances is damaging to the public view of Democrats.

"Today…the leading Democratic presidential contenders are condemning the Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold a ban on the procedure known as partial-birth abortion." And yes, she says, "An overwhelming majority of Americans, polls show, support a ban."

She concludes, "What are we to make of all this? Surely at a minimum that our enduring reluctance to acknowledge the complexity of the abortion issue has only prolonged and hardened the debate." Instead, says Henneberger, Democrats should recognize, at the very least, that the abortion debate is complex, and perhaps in doing so Democratic candidates will win back some of the money and supporters that have defected to the Republican Party.

"This issue has been very, very good to the Republican Party — and there is plenty more where that came from."

Read the New York Times op-ed article.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    This is very true, and I'm glad that the Times printed it.  This issue is the biggest factor in my decision to vote Republican.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I read the original article a few days ago.  I was amazed that it was printed in the NY Times.

    The light is slowly turning on.  Christ's message is the only message of value in all of time.  The creator gave His Word and everyone knows it.  Eventually neither party will be able to run on pro-choice.  It may take another 30 years but the truth will float to the top.

    GK – God is good!

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

     "Instead, says Henneberger, Democrats should recognize, at the very least, that the abortion debate is complex"

    What is complex? Either the child lives or the child dies?

    "Do not try to please everybody. Try to please God , the angels, and the saints. These are your public. If you are afraid of other people's opinion, you should not have become Christian." St John Vianney

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I agree with Bambushka: the "abortion issue" is not complex at all!  It is a question of future generations living or dying on a whim. 

    I'm often accused of being a "single-issue voter", and I proclaim that truth by reciting the first line of the Bill of Rights where "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are guaranteed!  And, the first of these is life!  The Democrats have (had–there's been a dearth lately!) some great ideas for social programs, but what good is an education, a job, a home, health care, etc. if I don't have LIFE to enjoy them?!  Life comes first!  Then, we'll talk.

    Meanwhile, I will not–cannot!–vote for a baby-killer.  And, that includes you, Mr. Guillani.

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I would also be accused of single issue voting and i reply by saying,

    "well,you would no doubt vote on the single issue of Gay Marriage.

    In addition,why doesn't your Party Election candidate admit where he or she stands on ALL issues at Elections,instead of just bragging about the

    wonderful things he or she is going to do about the Economy?"

    We have been conned by the past tendency of these political parties to say there is no official line on the religious issues.It was just a dodge to avoid having to answer.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Beware of wolves …

    This article sounds nice, but reminds me of the propaganda from the USSR in the 70's and 80's.  They'd get caught with their hand in the proverbial cookie jar, and then rush out a bunch of "acceptable good guys" to tell the public how wrong they were, etc.

    It's a ploy to get people thinking "… gee! Maybe they're getting the message – now I can vote Dem again!".  It will probably be moderately successful.  Meanwhile, read what Obama had to say at the UCC in California the other day.  The culture of death is alive and well, the destruction of family and morals is still at the top of their agenda!

    For public consumption they'll say what they need to say; the real deals are made in the backroom, and you can bet they're not changing their platform.

    This is a standard ploy, used effectively by defense lawyers, politicians, etc. – move on folks, nothing to see here … and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

    Unfortunately the other side is just as deceitful – As Gen. "Chesty" Puller would say, we've got them right where we want them – we're surrounded!

Leave a Reply