Catholic Exchange

Why the Culture Wars Don’t Evangelize Souls

I recently started reading Bishop Robert Barron and John L. Allen Jr.’s book To Light a Fire on the Earth: Proclaiming the Gospel in a Secular Age. I’ve read quite a few of Bishop Barron’s more theological books and I own both the Catholicism series and the most recent Pivotal Players series. He approaches evangelization in a deeply human and intuitive way. Many of his experiences are similar to my own. He emphasizes the beauty, depth, and richness of our Catholic Faith.

As I’ve written here before, beauty has had a foundational and significant impact on not only my reversion, but my spiritual journey as a whole. All of these experiences of beauty are grounded in Christ, most especially through an encounter both body and soul with Him in the Holy Eucharist. Barron leads with the beauty of the Faith fully realized in an encounter with Jesus Christ. It is a message that is so desperately needed in a culture that largely does not know how to relate to the beautiful, the good, and the true.

For Catholics one of the biggest mistakes we make in evangelization is getting too caught up in the culture wars. I made this mistake for a few years after my reversion. I thought: “If only we could explain Theology of the Body to people, then people would stop contracepting, ignoring Church teaching, the young would come back to the Church, etc.” Theology of the Body did have a profound impact on both me and my husband, but it didn’t cause my reversion. It took me a while to understand what took place within me that led me to give my life over to Christ and fully accept what the Church teaches.

The answer quite simply is that I had a real and tangible encounter with Jesus Christ. I saw Him through the beauty of the Mass. I wanted to give my life to Him because He had pierced me utterly at the deepest levels of my soul. I fell in love with Him and His Church. Only then was I ready to say: “Here, Lord. I give everything to you, even my sexuality.” Far too often, we lead with the Church’s doctrine and it doesn’t work. People are not converted by great moral theology, they are converted because they fall in love with Jesus Christ. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI put it best in Deus Caritas Est:

Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and decisive direction.

Those of us who are actively following Christ as disciples did not become Christian or remain Christian because we fell in love with ethics and the moral law. Instead, we fell in love with Christ and came to understanding all the demands placed upon us through Love. When we love others, we seek to empty ourselves. In our relationship with Christ, we are not only turning to Him in self-emptying love, we are conforming ourselves to Him, we are becoming more like Him. It is this self-emptying and desire to be in conformation to Him that leads us to throw our birth control pills away, give up lying and cheating, seek chastity, stop stealing, turn away from materialism and the lies of the culture in order to repent.

The most common approach Catholics take today in evangelizing the culture is engaging in the culture wars. This is well and good as far as it goes. Certain voices are adept at engaging intellectually with the culture on issues related to human sexuality especially since these are the most prevalent issues of our day. We need those voices. Our culture is obsessed with sex and in turn we have allowed ourselves to become obsessed with it, so much so that people only see the Catholic Church as a list of rules limiting how people can engage and live their sexuality. We cannot effectively evangelize from this vantage point and it is an error we all seem to make across the board.

Bishop Barron’s approach to evangelization is the same approach used by the Apostles. It is to declare the Good News of Christ risen from the dead and to lead people to an encounter with Our Living God. Our Faith is about Jesus Christ. He is the center of our Faith. He is the reason for our Faith. He is the One we love even to the point of death. We must draw people into this dynamic relationship between God and humanity. To do so, we must introduce people to the beauty of our faith and we must show them Christ. We ourselves must be actively living holy lives and seeking day-in-and-day out to lay down our lives in love to God and our neighbor.

Our example is one of the most effective evangelical tools at our disposal. Joy is infectious and people will begin to be drawn in because they will see Jesus Christ alive within us.

In order to evangelize effectively we also need to make sure we understand the centrality of our faith: Christ. Have we become obsessed with sex, the Liturgy wars, politics, etc. to the point that we are a stumbling block to others? Are our own preferences or even destructive ideologies getting in the way of our ability to lead others to Christ? Social media is a cacophonous din of competing ideologies. We cannot possibly help people encounter Christ if all we are doing is screaming at one another about pieces of the puzzle that is Catholicism, a good part of which is merely our own preferences.

Are we leading with Christ? Not in a beating people over the head with morality sort of way, but rather, with the gift of salvation that He wants to offer to all peoples. We have far too little faith if we assume that people must understand the Church teaching on sexuality first. No. People need to know Christ first. Only then can they give up those disordered desires in love to the One Who made them. It is our job to plant seeds. The Holy Spirit tends the garden. We cannot possibly help people who are struggling with certain sins if we come at them in attack mode all of the time.

Yes, the moral teaching of the Church matters. We must proclaim it boldly in all of its truth, beauty, and depth. It is a gift and it helps lead us to the happiness we are made for: beatitudo. We must always remember, however, that the moral teaching of the Church comes from Christ Himself through an encounter with Him. It is a relationship. One that is dynamic, exciting, and life-giving. We ourselves must be living the great adventure of holiness and drawing people on the path, not because we primarily want people to submit on sexuality, but because we want people to live the joy they are made for. The joy that can only come from loving God and accepting the gratuitous love He pours out on us each day. A love that leads us to abandon our lives to Him, even our sexuality. Let’s put Him at the center of our evangelical mission so that the world can hear the Good News.

Comments

8 responses to “Why the Culture Wars Don’t Evangelize Souls”

  1. Pax Avatar
    Pax

    I think it is very important that we preach the good new as it is presented in the bible.

    Paul is very specific, we do not preach the gospel of Christ ‘risen from the dead’ the gospel is primarily centered on Christ crucifixion. The resurrection is a result of the crucifixion not the other way around. The Crucifixion is where and when Christ is ‘lifted up ‘ to ‘heal the world’. If you read the acts of the apostles you will find Paul preached about the resurrection in Athens with little success. He later states ‘we preach Christ crucified,…. ‘

    St. Augustine wrote that sin is choosing a lesser good over a greater good because human beings by nature do not choose evil. What we choose is to avoid suffering , to avoid the cross. The crucifixion of Christ is the cure for suffering, it provides the courage needed to win the race.

    We also have to remember, that at the end of the day we can provide opportunities for people to meed Jesus , but that is ‘our best’ the rest is up to the two people meeting.

  2. Constance Avatar
    Constance

    Thank you for your thoughts! We definitely need a Christ centered scriptural approach. Both Bishop Barron and I would view the Good News in light of the entire Paschal Mystery, especially as Catholic theologians; with him being vastly superior to myself. Neither of us would leave out the Cross, and I say that confidentially without knowing him personally. I have written extensively on the necessity of the Cross over my years writing for CE.

  3. Rusty Avatar
    Rusty

    Evangelizing is hard, isn’t it? It is hard to plant mustard seeds, water them, and walk away, trusting in God to determine the result. Most of us have professional and personal lives where we solve problems and “fix” things, but God doesn’t allow us to bring Him to others that way. Just as nobody reaches out to God in prayer without God having called them first, we can’t expect our efforts to share our faith to have immediate results, no matter how badly we might want to help someone who doesn’t (yet) have that personal relationship with Christ.

    Suffering can truly be the time of trial, perhaps the (only?) time when our broken hearts are most open to the Holy Spirit; without suffering we believe in our own self-sufficiency. When we believe in the efficacy of our own will, God knows what we truly need, and He sends it our way. Whether we like it or not.

  4. Melissa47 Avatar
    Melissa47

    I think there’s a bit of a false dichotomy going on in your argument. You seem to suggest that either we Evangelize with beauty and encounter OR we engage in fighting for truth and justice in the culture.

    As a Church we have an obligation to do both. Evangelization is a step in the process of Christian initiation. It is followed by sacramental initiation and full communion in the Church Militant. An evangelized, initiatiated Catholic has a mission that Christ gives them. These missions, lived through various vocations, involve evangelizing others, yes, but also other battles to be fought.

    Unfortunately, the term New Evangelization has become so wide as to encompass all and have less and less concrete meaning. I think we need to recover our focus, and respect that people are at different places and have different calls, rather than judging all with one set of expectations, and setting up either/or’s where there should be both/and’s.

  5. john meyer Avatar
    john meyer

    Yes, I tend to disagree with Bishop Barron’s intuition on this matter. What he calls for in discretion is a denial of existential exigency, I would guess.

  6. Constance Avatar
    Constance

    For some reason people assume arguing for beauty precludes truth when beauty in fact leads to truth. Christ is Beauty, Truth, and Goodness itself. The assumption that one is isolated from the other is to be either/or. In fact, you did just that and ignored how I pointed out that truth matters.

    Beauty leads to truth. Hammering moral theology into people who are caught up in nihilism, utilitarianism, relativism, reductionism, and materialism doesn’t work. The data coming out of various studies shows that what we are doing—focusing on morality over introducing people to Christ—is failing. Not to mention that beauty moves people outside of themselves.

    Beauty and truth go together, but the people who solely focus on morality as if that’s the only form of truth that matters are the ones who cast aside beauty. I’m not the one being either/or. I mentioned the importance of Doctrine more than once, by the way.

    Not to mention that folks on the Internet really need to stop reading articles like this as if they offer a complete critique or answers. Its a gist of a complex topic. It’s a 1500 word essay. Read the book I reference to get a more complete picture. Nobody is being either/or. Rather it’s a re-arranging of both/and so we can truly introduce people to Christ in an age that is at war with truth.

  7. Constance Avatar
    Constance

    Since you seem to only be able to guess, perhaps reading his books would be helpful for clarity? His understanding and theology is quite clear when the effort is made to read his work. I disagree with him on some theological matters, but he has a very good read on why going at our culture focused on morality will continue to fail.

  8. Pax Avatar
    Pax

    thank you, that’s good to know. I was writing this as I’m dealing with some clerics who would rather never discuss sin and do not use a crucifix during the mass. One of whom claims Jesus did NOT say we should be holy and that the word ‘perfect’ in the beatitudes should be translated ‘inclusive’. I’m praying about what I should do. So I guess it seems to me as important to at least mention both in passing together as we would say Jesus is man and God.

    It can give excuse to confusion to some who want to embrace only 1/2 of the mystery.

Leave a Reply