Catholic Exchange

Christian Camp Loses Tax-Exempt Status over Refusal of Same-Sex Civil-Union Ceremony

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) announced on Monday that it was stripping the Methodist Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association of its tax-exempt status for part of its property. The Methodist camp made the news earlier this year after it refused, for religious reasons, to allow a lesbian couple to hold a "civil-union" ceremony at a pavilion on the camp's property.

The pavilion, said Scott Hoffman, the camp's chief administrative officer to LifeSiteNews, "is a facility we have used exclusively for our camp meeting mission and worship celebrations since 1869."

Until recently the camp held tax-exempt status on its entire boardwalk property under a New Jersey program that gives tax-breaks to organizations that open up their property to the general public.

In June, however, Harriet Bernstein and Luisa Pester, a lesbian, filed a complaint with the state attorney general's office on the basis of sexual orientation discrimination, after Ocean Grove refused to allow them to hold their "civil-union" ceremony at the camp's pavilion. A second lesbian couple has also sued Ocean Grove. New Jersey's anti-discrimination laws currently forbid those who "offer goods, services and facilities to the general public" from "directly or indirectly denying or withholding any accommodation, service, benefit, or privilege to an individual" on the basis of sexual orientation.

"It is clear that the pavilion is not open to all persons on an equal basis," DEP Commissioner Lisa Jackson, wrote to the camp on Monday, in announcing the DEP's decision to revoke the camp's tax-exempt status.

"When people hear the words 'open space,' we want them to think not just of open air and land, but that it is open to all people," Jackson continued. "And when the public subsidizes it with tax breaks, it goes with the expectation that it is not going to be parsed out, whether it be by activity or any particular beliefs."

Currently, however, there is some confusion over just how much of the camp's property no longer has tax-exempt status. As such, one homosexual advocacy group is threatening to appeal the DEP's decision, saying that it doesn't go far enough, reports the AP. "We're looking for a bigger victory here," said Steve Goldstein, the chairman of Garden State Equality. "We have the symbolic victory of the state telling Ocean Grove they're wrong, but there is a bigger victory to be had by having the entire tax-exemption removed. We're happy, but there's a lot more happiness to be had."

According to the Neptune Township tax assessor, the revocation of the tax-exempt status on the pavilion will only cost Ocean Grove about $175 a year, although Scott Hoffman has reportedly issued a statement claiming that the DEP's decision in fact appears to revoke tax-exempt status for "over 99 percent of the land." Hoffman said that Ocean Grove's lawyers are currently reviewing the decision.

In August, the Christian camp preempted the complaints currently pending against it by itself suing New Jersey state officials. According to the Alliance Defense fund, which is representing the camp, the attorney general's office is violating First Amendment protections by investigating Ocean Grove. "Religious groups have the right to make their own decisions without government interference," said Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. "The government can't force a private Christian organization to use its property in a way that would violate its own religious beliefs."

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Does this mean that churches are going to lose their tax-exempt status for not allowing gay weddings?

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Tax exempt status is based on availability to the public, that seems odd.  I thought that tax exemptions were tied to the non-commercial nature of (in this case) religious entities.

    And yes, Claire, the push is to make churches lose all of their status, in whatever arena, for not bowing to the gay agenda.
  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I think it's probably Protestant churches that allow anyone to use their facilities for a wedding  that are more at risk than Catholic Churches which only allow Catholics to get married in their buildings.  After all there are all kinds of restrictions for Catholic weddings, including Pre-Cana, posting off the banns, one party at least being a baptized Catholic, etc.  Most Protestant churches I know don't have any particular requirements for people using their churches other than sometimes they have to use the pastor to officiate and non-members have to pay a higher fee.  Of course that's not to say that once gay marriage laws get passed there won't be some baptized Catholics who are gay who won't sue the Church.  The legislators may not have that in mind (most of them see marriage as a civil not Church matter anyway), but we've seen what hash the courts have made out of previous legislation.  Currently, the local UCC hasn't had any gay marriages or civil unions take place in the church building because the congregation hasn't approved it, but the pastor is open to performing civil unions.  Since it's one of the most desirable locations in the area (lovely building, gorgeous green outside), I'm sure it's just a matter of time before someone makes an issue of it.

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I've been to Ocean Grove a number of times for Jars of Clay and other concerts. It's a beautiful little town on the Jersey shore that is really a meeting place for the tri-state area's Christian communities (NY, NJ, CT).

    It also has a neat little history. Billy Sunday, among many other American preachers (including Charles Stanley) has spoken at the grand old Pavillion. If you like Victorian architecture and little shops by the ocean, you'll love the place. Yes, Catholics are treated wonderfully there.

    They host many different events throughout the year; the best one being the Beach Festival where literally thousands of Christians gather on the sandy beaches for fun, with star991 fm live on the boardwalk.  

    That said, there are a million other places for homosexuals to hold their 'ceremonies'. It's literally a shame and a disgrace that people like Bernstein, Goldstein and Pester would flaunt their totalitarian, and yes, 'evil' values on the Christian community.   

    http://www.ogcma.org/pages/ogbeachfestival

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Mallys, that's what I always thought constituted tax-exempt:  the non-commercial, non-profit status of an organization.  I knew that tax-exempt organizations weren't allowed to make political endorsements, but it's ridiculous for their tax-exempt status to be removed because they have some values!

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "We're happy(gay), but there's a lot more happiness(gayness) to be had." Perversion is insatiable until it self-destructs. Isn't there a pavillion at a Synagogue somewhere that would let them do it?

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Let's retaliate by refusing to support Government or secular run charities.

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I crossed United Way off my list. Actually now I only do Catholic charities. My business however, participates in the St. Jude Telethon. I'd like some feedback on that organization because I've heard nothing but good.

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "We're happy, but there's a lot more happiness to be had." Whatever happened to the Gay/Lesbian community's assertion that they just wanted to be left alone to live their lives in peace without harassment? Now they are on the offensive and in full proselytizing mode. Reminds me of the old saying, "Give them an inch …….." As they once stated that they desired to be left alone by the heterosexual community, so that they could live their lives in peace …… I so too wish they would leave the heterosexual community alone, to let us live our lives in peace.

    BTW, goral, St. Judes Children Hospital, was founded by Danny Thomas as a promise to St. Jude for a favor granted with the help of his intercession. It is an excellent charity with ALL proceeds going to research childhood cancer and related diseases. I'm probably biased though, as my Mom gave me Jude as my middle Baptismal name. I try to donate to them whenever I can, as part of my tithe.

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    For what it's worth, I think the exemption being struck down by this suit is a property tax exemption, not an income tax exemption.  Though they do not have to pay income tax on tithes, pastors, abbots, abbesses, and bishops still have to pay property taxes on Church property.

    If Caesar again decides to impose a temple tax, then we are far better off paying it than letting our faith be bent by conforming it to the requirements he imposes for a tax-exempt status. And if this means we get taxed for speaking the truth about marriage, life, or any other moral issue, then that is far better than the alternative.

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    That's a good point, Arkanabar.  Thanks for clarifying.

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Paying taxes is tantamount to paying homage. The church should not pay homage to any gov't, because it has a different master. As authorities they are equals. That's the principle. Reasonable govt's and those that derive their power from the consent of the governed understand and abide by this principle for the most part; recognizing that the charitable and moral service that the church provides is indispesable. Totalitarian and unjust govt's challange that arrangement because they're threatened by it. The Garden State Gays would have a lot more gayness if they could  have the church pay homage to a gov't of their own design.

  13. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    One thing that is missed here is that the homosexuals were not denied use of the facility becasue they were homosexual, but because of what they wanted to do there. If they wanted to hold a family reunion and were told "no you're a homosexual" then there case would make more sense.

     

    The study of God is a study of Love

  14. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Good point, Minardi.

    It seems like that is th opint for the other side of this issue as well.  It is actually normal for most establishments to allow homosexuals to do what the place is designed for.  So it seems the idea is to do something spectacular there instead.  Hence, same-sex "weddings" out on the steps or the street and so forth.

     

Leave a Reply