Catholic Exchange

The “Timidity” of the Holy Father

Pope Benedict XVI's critics say he's timid, overly cautious, slow to make decisions. Against that background, and without suggesting the criticism has no basis in fact, it's enlightening to observe that in recent days, Benedict has taken the following steps: reversed important policy decisions of two of his predecessors, taken a big gamble aimed at healing a dangerous schism, reminded the world's bishops that he's boss, risked offending ecumenical dialogue partners — and then headed off cheerfully on vacation.

If this is timidity, one might reasonably ask, what must boldness look like?

The matters involved in these recent papal moves are well known. First, on June 26, the Vatican released a document from Benedict that makes a potentially crucial change in the procedure for electing a pope.

Back in 1996, in a departure from long tradition, Pope John Paul II decreed that after a conclave had spent 13 days trying unsuccessfully to elect someone by a two-thirds majority vote, the cardinals could switch to election by a simple majority if they wished. Many people felt this was a bad idea, since potentially it allowed a determined group composed of just half the electors plus one to stand pat on its candidate and resist compromise until the time arrived when it could get what it wanted. That's no way to choose a pope, it was privately said.

Evidently, one of those who shared that view was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — now, Pope Benedict XVI. His new rule for the conclave insists that, come what may, a pope must have the votes of two-thirds of the cardinals. That also involves potential difficulties, but at least it guarantees that whoever gets is elected will be a true consensus choice.

 Benedict followed up on July 7 with a second document, in effect restoring the old form of the Mass to a position of virtual parity with the new form. In doing so, he was, for practical purposes, reversing Pope Paul VI's decision back in 1970 which virtually banned celebration of Mass in the old form.

Not only that — Paul VI had allowed for continued celebration of Mass the old way by elderly priests, but only if they got special permission. John Paul II expanded authorization of the old form in 1984 and 1988, while also insisting on the local bishop's permission. Not any more. Under Benedict XVI's regulations, starting September 14 any priest who wants to celebrate Mass in the old form can do so, with no further permission required.

Pope Benedict's intention is clear. "Internal reconciliation" in the Church, he calls it — in other words, reconciliation with traditionalists who yearn for Mass in the old form and, especially, with the 600,000 members of the Society of St. Pius X, the schismatic group of followers of the late, breakaway Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

Will it work? Hard to say. Unhappiness with the new form of Mass isn't the Lefebvrists' only complaint. They also have problems with things like ecumenism and religious liberty. Significantly, the Vatican, on July 10, issued a statement from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, reaffirming the salvific uniqueness of the Catholic Church — a principle traditionalists believe has been obscured by ecumenical excesses.

The point isn't that Pope Benedict has suddenly found the key to resolving all these difficulties. But — patient, methodical, fond of consultation as he is — he has the moxie to try. The critics need to let this man be pope his own way. He's going to do that anyway, after all, whether they like it or not.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I have a great love for this current pope. Raymond Arroyo showed some clips of an interview with him from 2003 the other night on EWTN. I had never heard him speak in a language I could understand before, and several things struck me: 1) His great humility that manifested itself in an endearing gentleness (one might even call it a bit of shyness), 2) his great knowledge and passion for the Truth evidenced by his choice of words, 3) his impish playfulness and sense of humor, 4) his brilliance shown in his uncanny command of the English language. This man may not have been an actor prior to becoming a priest, as JPII did, but he is no less a warrior.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I could not agree more.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Ditto to the above comments.  My husband and I were at a Wed audience over a year ago, you could see Pope Benedict's gentle grandfatherly eyes at any distance! He playfully waved with various groups in the audience too.  I have a deep love for him and a deep respect, also, because he epitomizes the strength, wisdom, and humility of a man's man!

    Ironically, my husband was very upset today because the local,well respected, protestant minister authority here and his radio host were bashing Pope Benedict for returning the Church to the Dark Ages for reaffirming the salvific uniqueness of the Catholic Church!  I guess they don't think he's timid!

    To quote a bumper sticker, "I love my German Shepherd!" 

    "Viva il Papa!"

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Count me in on the cheering section!  German shepherds (the dog breed) tend to be quiet, unassuming, and take their time making decisions.  However, when they've made up their mind, they brook no resistance.  And, just try attacking those they "shepherd" (their families, their work)…..they don't have teeth and massive neck muscles for no reason!  Sounds a lot a certain Papa we've come to know and love in the last 2 1/2 years, doesn't it?  I've known and loved several German Shepherds in my life, but this one will always be my favorite!

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Amen to all of the above comments.  I know someone who has German shepherds, and everything they say about the breed is true.  They're real sweethearts — and so is our Holy Father.  After all, you have to love a man who's a musician, loves Mozart, and appreciates cats!  A man after my own heart.  Viva il Papa!Laughing

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I began reading his books when he was still a Cardinal, so I was absolutely delighted upon his election to 'Papa'.  If you haven't read one, I recomment any of them.  My reaction upon finishing one is usually, "Wow!  That was good," followed by "Wow!  I have to think about that for about a week and a half."  At least for me, I start thinking down channels I haven't gone before.  We are absolutely blessed to have two singular men follow each other in leading the Church.  One a philosopher, the other a theologian, both brilliant.

    Timidity can be confused with sure-footedness, especially in this culture of instant gratification when people never take the time to weigh the consequences of their actions.   In a Church that thinks in terms of centuries, this should be an applaudable trait.

Leave a Reply