Catholic Exchange

Biting Back Against Malaria on Africa Malaria Day

Every night, after a day bent in half weeding her peanut and pepper patch, Aminata Senesie pumps water, bathes her children, and then puts them to bed. Then she gets in with them.

It's a little crowded, but Aminata doesn't mind. The 20-year-old mother of three can finally sleep peacefully. Jusu, her three-year-old, is on one side. And Sao and Jinnah — her 7-month-old twins — are on the other. And all of them are under an insecticide-treated mosquito net, thanks to CRS. But unfortunately, this is something rare in Kailahun, a humid, crumbling province in Sierra Leone that its residents share with hoards of mosquitoes.

You can't escape them in Sajilla, where Aminata lives. In this mining village near the Liberian border, mosquitoes are everywhere. They come out at night and invite themselves into the beds of couples and kids. And if you listen closely, between clicking insects and the crashing rain, you may hear the fleshy slaps of someone's nocturnal battle with them. Mosquitoes, for many, are just a fact of life.

But for Aminata, it became too much. She couldn't stomach seeing the bites on Jusu. "Jusu was always sick with malaria," she says. "He would get very hot, become pale and refuse food. We would take him to the health post and spend a lot of money on medicine, but he would just get sick again."

In fact, according to the World Health Organization, a poor family like Aminata's living in a place like Kailahun may spend 25 percent or more of its annual income on prevention and treatment. What's worse, fewer than 5 percent of kids in Sierra Leone under five-years-old sleep under treated bed nets. Across the continent, millions don't use them. That's where Catholic Relief Services comes in, along with its donors — including the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in Sierra Leone and other countries and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

 Each year, at least 300 million people contract serious cases of malaria worldwide, with more than 1 million people dying — the majority of them being young children in Africa. Africa Malaria Day, observed April 25th this year, highlights the commitment of African governments to roll back this debilitating disease. And from The Gambia to Ethiopia, CRS is helping to do its part.

In The Gambia, CRS is distributing free insecticide-treated bed nets and increasing malaria awareness. CRS' five-year Global Fund program aims to decrease by 30 percent malaria-related sickness and deaths among pregnant women and children under five. That's good news for mothers such as Fatou Dibba, who has received a free bed net. "The net has made a big difference to me and my family," she says. "Not even flies or cockroaches can come inside once the net is down."

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, CRS is working with local partners and government agents in 25 underserved rural health zones to reduce the number of children and mothers falling sick and dying from common diseases, including malaria. With funding from USAID and the United Nations, CRS initiatives will impact more than 1 million people over five years.

CRS is also working with district and national health departments and the diocese of Embu in Kenya to prevent deaths of children primarily from malaria, pneumonia and malnutrition. As part of the USAID-funded child survival program, CRS has helped to upgrade health services at the district level in Embu. Health professionals are being trained to better manage cases of childhood malaria. In addition, community volunteers are teaching households to spot the danger signs of malaria, and families are gaining greater access to treated bed nets.

Across Africa, most people accept malaria as a fact of life. CRS aims to change this. A new initiative in Ethiopia helps community members — many of whom can't read — take malaria prevention into their own hands. An innovative manual shows community members how to work together to determine how malaria is spread and, more importantly, take action to stop its spread locally.

It's CRS programs like these that help people like Aminata. But CRS also educates African medical professionals so they can help their own community members.

Take Nemah Ellie. She is a traditional birth attendant who works with expecting mothers in Sierra Leone. Nemah says the lack of information is a major part of the problem.

"People used to believe that malaria came from sucking too many oranges or eating too much palm oil," she says. "Some people even believed that witchcraft caused children to die from malaria."

Now Nemah, trained by CRS, instructs expecting mothers to take at least two doses of oral medication during their pregnancy. This helps clear the parasite from their bodies and helps their unborn children grow. This education works. Just ask Aminata. "My children do not have the rash any longer from mosquito bites," she says.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Another treatment that has saved millions from malaria is DDT. But thanks to Silent Spring, we decided that our raptors were more important than the millions worldwide who die from malaria, ever since the manufacture of DDT was outlawed and the stockpiles ran out.
    And the science of Silent Spring has been debunked. Reports of raptors crushing soft-shelled eggs in the nest by brooding on them predate the introduction of DDT.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Actually, Silent Spring author Rachel Carson made an explicit exemption for the legitimate use of DDT in the fight against malaria – while at the same time pooh-poohing the exception. Her modern followers are actually more radical by far than what her writings represent. Katherine Mangu-Ward writes Suffering in Silence, published this past weekend by the Wall Street Journal, in which she rightly points out that "threats to human health were central to [Ms. Carson's] argument, and Carson was wrong about those." At the same time, Ms. Mangu-Ward also reports the following:

    Carson cannot be blamed directly for these deaths. She didn't urge total bans in "Silent Spring." Instead, on the single page obliquely acknowledging DDT as an anti-malarial agent, she writes, "Practical advice should be 'Spray as little as you possibly can' rather than 'Spray to the limit of your capacity.'"

    Indeed, there is a specific exception contained in the Stockholm Convention that bans DDT and other chemicals. Again, it is Ms. Mangu-Ward who provides the research:

    The convention contains a tightly circumscribed exception for continued public health use, but even that exception almost didn't make it into the final document. Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund and more than 300 other environmental groups fought tooth and nail against it. In recent years, many such groups tried to get a complete ban on all DDT uses by 2007–in time for Carson's birthday.

    One is forced to conclude that the reason DDT is no longer used as a preventive is the pressure of developed countries imposed upon the developing world. Again, let's listen to Ms. Mangu-Ward:

    In the mid-'90s, the only South American country that continued to use DDT, Ecuador, was also the only country to experience a significant decline in malaria. Many countries, like Uganda, remain hesitant to use DDT because European nations have threatened to refuse their agricultural exports if they do.

    It's a shame. Nevertheless, the global ban on DDT use, along with the decisions by most nations not to make use of the exception to the ban, must be understood as no different than the colonialism so vehemently decried by the modern environmentalist movement, a movement far more radical and intolerant than anything Ms. Carson ever envisioned.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I wholeheartedly applaud CRS for its valiant and effective humanitarian efforts in Africa and many other regions of the world.  I have heard that another large component of the malaria problem is the fact that the use of DDT as a pesticide was banned a few decades ago, due to concerns about DDT's effects on the environment.  Some say that reports of its harm to the environment were overblown and that we were on the verge of eradicating malaria when the ban was implemented.  I would be interested to hear anything that Mr. Hartill or any other knowledgeable person might know about this issue.

Leave a Reply