Catholic Exchange

UNICEF Sponsors Abortion under Guise of Protecting Women

A new global initiative was launched by various UN agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in New York last week that includes a call for legal abortion. Among the sponsors of the initiative called "Deliver Now for Women and Children" is the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), a UN agency that persistently denies they support abortion in any way, shape or form.

Marketed as a campaign to raise awareness of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on maternal and child health, the agenda of "Deliver Now" includes a call for "safe abortion" which is synonymous with legal abortion. The campaign is coordinated by The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health, chaired by Kul Gautam, the deputy executive director of UNICEF and assistant secretary-general of the UN, and whose members include among others: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, International Planned Parenthood Federation, government development agencies from the US, UK, Canada and Bangladesh, as well as WHO and UNFPA.

The campaign lists a number of severe maladies that effect maternal health and concludes "most maternal deaths could be prevented if women had access to and could use professional care." "Deliver Now" defines "quality care" as including "services before and during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period, as well as safe abortion."

The "Deliver Now" website features the stark tagline, "More than 10,000,000 deaths per year. Too many to ignore." This enormous number is the conflation of two numbers; the total number of childhood deaths per year from all causes, said to be 10 million, and the number of deaths women suffer from maternal causes, a highly suspect number claimed by some UN agencies to total 500,000 per year.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the child mortality numbers are calculated from official sources including birth and death data derived from vital registration, census, and/or household surveys. On the other hand, the maternal mortality statistics are questionable estimations at best. According to the WHO, the primary source for maternal mortality statistics, "data on maternal mortality and other causes of death are often unavailable or, where available, are unreliable due to deficiencies in vital statistics registration systems." Dr. Joseph Chamie, the former head of the UN Population Division, official statisticians of the UN, states the 500,000 number used for maternal deaths cannot substantiated and he refused to use it.

Pro-family UN watchers are concerned that the disproportionate focus on unsafe abortion based upon questionable maternal mortality figures detracts from addressing the major health risks to pregnant women in the developing world. Experts say these are severe bleeding, eclampsia and obstructed labor. By UNFPA's own admission in a 2004 report, the most important means of reducing maternal mortality is not access to contraceptives and legal abortion but the presence of skilled birth attendants and access to emergency obstetric care.

Abortion proponents often link unsafe abortion and maternal mortality to push for legal, so-called "safe" abortion. Critics of this argument are quick to point out that in Poland, when abortion was severely restricted in 1993, the country showed a sharp decline in the abortion rate and a decline in maternal deaths. In Ireland, where abortion remains illegal, the country reports one of the lowest maternal mortality rates in the world. By contrast, while the United States has had abortion on demand since 1973, this year the US reported a rise in maternal deaths.

The next scheduled event in the "Deliver Now" campaign is the Women Deliver Conference in London from October 18-20 which also focuses heavily on abortion rights.

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    "The agenda of 'Deliver Now' includes a call for 'safe abortion' which is synonymous with legal abortion."

    It follows that when the thinking is convoluted so is the language. Move the UN to Africa where they'll be closer to their work. They're a stain on our soil.

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Actually legal abortion and safe abortion are not identical terms.  Given the abortion activists that want abortuaries to be exempt from the standards for other outpatient clinics, some activists do not give a tinkers' dam about safe abortion, so long as legal abortions remain available.

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    goral,

    I hate to be the one to tell you but the UN in New York is NOT in the US. Rather, it is the sovereign territory of the UN. We gave it to them. We can't turn around and try to take it back. That would be EXACTLY the same as the US government did to numerous Native American tribal nations.

    I wouldn't want to be linked to something THAT dispicable.

    Additionally, I wouldn't want to give the rest of the world the same idea. Could you imagine what could happen to Vatican City if Italy got the same idea? And then what would you say? If we can take the sovereignty away from the UN, then Italy would be within its rights to do the same to the pope.

    Sucks how international politics works, huh?

Leave a Reply