Catholic Exchange

Faithful Citizenship

The approaching November elections in the Commonwealth of Virginia provide us with the privileged opportunity to participate in this important public duty.

I reaffirm what we Roman Catholic bishops recently stated in Faithful Citizenship: A Catholic Call to Political Responsibility (USCCB 2003): “In the Catholic tradition, responsible citizenship is a virtue; participation in the political process is a moral obligation. All believers are called to faithful citizenship, to become informed, active and responsible participants in the political process. As we have said, 'We encourage all citizens, particularly Catholics, to embrace their citizenship not merely as a duty and privilege, but as an opportunity meaningfully to participate [more fully] in building the culture of life. Every voice matters in the public forum. Every vote counts. Every act of responsible citizenship is an exercise of significant individual power.' Even those who are not citizens are called to participate in the debates which shape our common life.”

As Catholics and American citizens, our unique Catholic morality does not easily fit into the “left” or the “right” nor to any political platform. Moreover, we are called to be a “community of conscience” and to focus on values shaping public life from the perspective of Sacred Scripture and the principles of Catholic social teaching. “Our responsibility is to measure all candidates, policies, parties, and platforms by how they protect or undermine the life, dignity, and rights of the human person " whether they protect the poor and vulnerable and advance the common good” (cf. “Faithful Citizenship,” 2003).

As Catholics, we have a duty to share our values, raise our voices, and use our votes to form a society that protects human life, promotes family life, pursues social justice and practices solidarity. We Catholic Bishops stated clearly: “For Catholics the defense of human life and dignity is not a narrow cause, but a way of life and a framework for action. " Catholics in politics must reflect the moral values of our faith with clear and consistent priority for the life and dignity of the human person” (“Faithful Citizenship,” 2003).

There are seven themes at the heart of Catholic social teaching: life and dignity of the human person, the call to promote family life, community and participation, rights and responsibilities, option for the poor and the vulnerable, the dignity of work and the rights of workers, and solidarity and care for God's creation. The Catholic approach to faithful citizenship begins with these essential Catholic moral principles, not with a party platform.

I ask you to consider the full range of issues facing us in Virginia in the light of the foundational principles of the sacredness of human life and the dignity of the human person who has been created in the image and likeness of God. I urge you to assess the positions of candidates on critical questions where human life and human dignity are threatened, especially in the following areas:

" abortion

" capital punishment

" family, children and at risk youth

" health care

" housing and homelessness

" immigration

" living wage

" poverty and the working poor

All of these concerns are inter-related while simultaneously being rooted in the right to life from its very beginning at conception. As we read in “Living the Gospel of Life”: “Good people frequently disagree on which problems to address, which policies to adopt, and how best to apply them. But for citizens and elected officials alike, the basic principle is simple: We must begin with a commitment never to intentionally kill, or collude in the killing of, any innocent human life, no matter how broken, unformed, disabled or desperate that life many seem (21). We cannot simultaneously commit ourselves to human rights and progress while eliminating or marginalizing the weakest among us (20).”

In closing, to protect the legitimate separation of church and state I ask parish leaders to observe the enclosed guidelines as you encourage participation in the political process.

One with you in prayer and in the exercise of our privileged right to vote, I am

Faithfully in Christ,

Most Rev. Paul S Loverde

Bishop of Arlington

(This letter appears courtesy of the Arlington Catholic Herald.)

Comments

  1. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    TO LITTLE, TOO LATE!!!

    Most Catholics haven't got a clue that they are supposed to have their Faith inform their conscience which in turn directs their actions in the public arena.

    Kent C. Bois

  2. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    That is so true Kent.  Furthermore, very few priests will mention this document from the pulpit.

    Ray

    Rio Vista, CA

  3. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I am glad that the pro-life issue is finally addressed.  It hurts me to watch Catholics vote for pro-choice candidates because they feel that pro-life is one issue of many, all equal in importance.  That is not the case as shown by the statement.  Without life, no other social justice can be improved or changed.  Now if we can only let the American Catholics know this amazing truth!   

  4. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    God loves you .

    Kent, Ray, let’s give it a few months – say, until primaries get close in one locale or another – to see how this is handled, ordinary to diocese, and to pastor to congregations.

    I think that we should see, be able to expect, concerted, multi-faceted efforts over three or four Sundays just prior to primaries – OR, yes, their latest document is one more piece of dithering self-service.

    From this document’s length and cautiousness, I must say that I still prefer Catholic Answers’ pointedly short, straightforward pamphlet. They measure out the preeminent factors, and make it clear that any candidate must get through this ‘gauntlet of obedience to moral law’ first. Once right with God on the life, marriage and family issues, Catholics can look judiciously into the rest of issues.

    Remember, I love you, too .

    In the Suffering of Christ, and in His hope of His Resurrection,

    Pristinus Sapienter

    (wljewell @catholicexchange.com or … yahoo.com)

  5. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    I think this is awesome. Call me old fashioned but I still believe that when bishops unite and teach in unity with the pope it has great power. This document is a case of that. It clearly mentions abortion as having much more gravity than other issues.  I would not describe it as cautious at all. Will priests and Catholic religion educators teach this document? Well if they ignore something almost all US bishops have agreed to then you wonder what they are waiting for. I am not as cynical about the church as many here are. I think the bishops are getting strong and stronger all the time. I think it is making a difference on the ground. We need to praise God for what is happening and support the leaders He has given us.

  6. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    MFeeney,

         I share your frustration, especially because I used to be one of those Catholics who thought that abortion was just one of many life issues, all of equal weight. Poor catechesis is part of the problem.  As I became better catechized, I began to realize that an unborn baby is the ultimate in innocence and the bottom line when it come to life values.  (Not to mention that in sheer numbers, abortion bears more weight than any other life issue.) 

  7. Guest Avatar
    Guest

     

    Does this "get in the way" of the "proportionate reason" mentality?

  8. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    MFeeney,

    May I humbly ask if you, too, are an American Catholic?

    Remember, the Sun is always shining!

  9. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    To all,

    And I will preface this statement with the fact that I am right there in the trenches with you, weapon in hand{thank you dear Mother}, defending the unborn, but may I ask what sin will send us to hell first or fastest? Lack of respect for the unborn or the born?

     

    Remember, the Sun is always shining!

  10. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    wljewel  Giving it a couple of months is silly. It takes time to inform the faithful and give them a chance to really absorb what is going on. We already know that there is serious dissent amongst our cardinals, bishops and priests. Seeing who moves on this now will speak volumes. We  have already had several decades of inaction leading to an unchatechized lay faithful and a rebelious presbyterate.

     

    Kent C. Bois

  11. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    Someone did their homework.

     http://defendlife.blogspot.com/2007/11/evaluation-of-presidential-candidates.html

    God Bless this guy.

    Here is how the candidates fared (revised 11/21):

    1. Ron Paul (R): 99 points
    2. Alan Keyes (R): 70 (not on the ballot in all states)
    3. Mike Huckabee (R): 69
    4. Duncan Hunter (R): 50
    5. Tom Tancredo (R): 48
    6. John McCain (R): 36
    7. Chris Dodd (D): 25
    8. Dennis Kucinich (D): 22
    9. Mitt Romney (R): 10
    10. Joe Biden (D): 5
    11. Fred Thompson (R): 4
    12. Hillary Clinton (D): (-11)
    13. John Edwards (D): (-13)
    14. Bill Richardson (D): (-15)
    15. Barack Obama (D): (-15)
    16. Rudy Giuliani (R): (-28)

    In an analysis based on criteria found in the "Faithful Citizenship" document recently issued by the US Catholic Bishops, I attempted to complete a somewhat objective comparison of 2008 Republican and Democrat presidential candidates.

    I evaluated their positions on 30 different issues, eight of which were the issues involving potentially "intrinsically evil" positions and 22 which were other important issues. I marked each candidate as supporting the Catholic position ("Y"), not supporting the Catholic position ("N") or unknown position ("?"). I then weighted the positions as follows: +10 per "Y" and -10 per "N" on "intrinsically evil" issues and +1 per "Y" and -1 per "N" on the other issues. Unknown positions were counted as zero points.

    Here is how the candidates fared (see revised standings above):

    1. Keyes, Alan: 60 points (not on the ballot in all states)
    2. Paul, Ron: 60
    3. Hunter, Duncan: 50
    4. Huckabee, Mike: 49
    5. Tancredo, Tom: 48
    6. McCain, John: 16
    7. Thompson, Fred: 14
    8. Dodd, Chris: 5
    9. Kucinich, Dennis: (-8)
    10. Romney, Mitt: (-10)
    11. Biden, Joe: (-15)
    12. Richardson, Bill: (-25)
    13. Giuliani, Rudy: (-28)
    14. Clinton, Hillary: (-31)
    15. Edwards, John: (-33)
    16. Obama, Barack: (-35)

    The "intrinsically evil" (10 points each) issues were:

    • Protect all unborn (no exceptions; unborn protected under the Constitution)
    • Oppose Euthanasia
    • Oppose Research that Results in Embyonic Destruction
    • Oppose all Human Cloning
    • Oppose targeting of Noncombatants (Use of nuclear weapons or landmines)
    • Marriage is One Man, One Woman; Oppose "domestic partnerships"
    • Oppose Use of Torture (added 11/20/07)
    • Oppose Racism (added 11/20/07)

    The other issues (1 point each) were:

    • Oppose the Death Penalty
    • Support a "Responsible Transition" in Iraq & Afghanistan
    • Work to avoid war and promote peace while dealing with terrorism
    • Ethical treatment for undocumented immigrants & family reunification
    • Temporary worker program with clear path to permanent residency for immigrants
    • Secure borders from illegal immigration
    • Support responsible use of media
    • Affordable health care
    • Health policies allow for conscientious objection
    • No contraceptive or abortive mandates in health programs
    • Choice in education
    • Support for religious schools
    • Support fair wages & programs to decrease unemployment
    • Support affordable housing
    • Welfare should reduce poverty & dependence
    • Support good social security program
    • Support sustainable agriculture & food security for all
    • Good environmental policies that respect God's creation
    • Support faith-based groups
    • Work to alleviate global poverty
    • Promote religious liberty and other basic human rights worldwide
    • Peaceful resolution in Israel, support Palestinian State & Lebanon's sovereignty

    If you have a Google account

  12. Guest Avatar
    Guest

    What matters most in the upcoming American Presidential election is for the Electorate to cast a vote for who will best fulfill the Executive branch of the American federal government.  The most pressing concerns in that endeavor is first, who can execute the power of the singular Constitutional mandate of that office, that of Commander-in-Chief.  Second, the President serves as the nation's implemeter of federal law and as such it is important to consider who among the field of candidates will nominate and/or hire the right people for that mandate of office.

     

    This is why it is imperative for Christians everywhere to intercede for Providence to be upon this nation.  Every issue that comes up during an election cycle is secondary to fulfilling the Constitutional mandate of the office in question.  Thus, Christians have a special obligation to pray about it and above all else, cast your vote

     

     

    Joseph Bailey 

     

     

Leave a Reply