Catholic Exchange

ND Prez Comment on USCCB Document Prohibiting Honoring Pro-Abortion Politicians

LifeSiteNews.com has obtained a copy of University of Notre Dame President Fr. John Jenkins’ commentary on the U.S. Bishops Conference (USCCB) document, “Catholics in the Political Life,” which was sent to Notre Dame’s Board of Trustees at the beginning of this month. In the commentary Jenkins explains how he believes that the university’s invitation of President Obama to be this year’s commencement speaker and receive an honorary law degree is in keeping with the “letter and the spirit” of the recommendations included in the USCCB document.

The USCCB issued “Catholics in Political Life” in 2004. The document directs Catholic schools not to honor pro-abortion politicians.  Many of the 29 bishops who have so far spoken out against the scandal, including Notre Dame’s Bishop John D’Arcy and USCCB President Cardinal Francis George, have indicated that the school’s invitation to President Obama to speak at commencement and receive an honorary law degree was in violation of the bishops’ directive.  (To view the USCCB document, go to: http://www.usccb.org/bishops/catholicsinpoliticallife.shtml)

The following is the complete text of Jenkins’ commentary:

In June 2004, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement, “Catholics in Political Life.”  A number of people have quoted this document with regard to Notre Dame’s invitation to President Obama to be its Commencement Speaker and receive an honorary degree.  Our interpretation of this document is different from the one that has been imposed by those criticizing us, and I wanted to explain our understanding.

The 2004 document was clearly adopted by the Bishops as provisional.  As the document says, “[h]aving received an extensive report from the Task Force on Catholic Bishops and Catholic Politicians, and looking forward to the full report, we highlight several points from the interim report that suggest some directions for our efforts….”  Nevertheless, despite its provisional character, this document has been used by all the people at Notre Dame who recommend speakers for commencement or others for honorary degrees since its publication.  We have tried to follow both the letter and the spirit of its recommendations.

Two key sentences of the document have been frequently quoted regarding the invitation to President Obama:

“Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles.  They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.”

Because the title of the document is “Catholics in Political Life”, we understood this to refer to honoring Catholics whose actions are not in accord with our moral principles.  This interpretation was supported by canon lawyers we consulted, who advised us that, by definition, only Catholics who implicitly recognize the authority of Church teaching can act in “defiance” of it.  Moreover, fellow university presidents have told me that their bishops have told them that in fact it is only Catholic politicians who are referred to in this document.

In addition, regardless of how one interprets the first sentence, the second is also important.  It reads: “They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions. [My italics]”  In every statement I have made about the invitation of President Obama and in every statement I will make, I express our disagreement with him on issues surrounding the protection of life, such as abortion and embryonic stem cell research.  If we repeatedly and clearly state that we do not support the President on these issues, we cannot be understood to “suggest support”.

Finally, the document states that “we need to do more to persuade all people that human life is precious and human dignity must be defended.  This requires more effective dialogue and engagement with all public officials….”  However misguided some might consider our actions, it is in the spirit of providing a basis for dialogue that we invited President Obama.

On May 17 we will welcome the ninth President who will receive an honorary degree from Notre Dame.  It will be an important opportunity to bring the leader of our nation to Notre Dame, and, I hope, a joyful day for our graduates and their families.

Fr. John Jenkins, C.S.C.

Comments

6 responses to “ND Prez Comment on USCCB Document Prohibiting Honoring Pro-Abortion Politicians”

  1. wgsullivan Avatar
    wgsullivan

    Translation: Fr. Jenkins and crew were looking for loop holes and they have exploited what they found.
    Never mind what the Pope told Nancy Pelosi. I’m paraphrasing, but something along the lines that ALL and especially politicians have the duty to uphold the sanctity of life.
    Fr. Jenkins and crew sound like one of my teenagers trying to justify their positions with everything but the full truth.
    Mother Mary, pray for us.

  2. Mary Kochan Avatar
    Mary Kochan

    Here is an excerpt from one canon lawyer’s response:

    It is paradigmatic of the theological Left to ignore canon law when it poses the slightest inconvenience for its plans, but to hide behind canons (or at least behind canonists, even anonymous ones) when they afford some cover (however thin) for obvious blunders or malfeasance. And so Jenkins, invoking unidentified canon lawyers, holds that the USCCB’s 2004 statement, “Catholics in Political Life”, merely restricts Catholic institutions from honoring Catholics whose public record evidences disdain for fundamental moral principles.

    Is the man serious?

    Read the rest here: http://www.canonlaw.info/2009/04/fr-jenkins-discovers-canon-law-not.html

  3. fatherjo Avatar
    fatherjo

    Arizona State University in Phoenix is having President Obama deliver its commencement address, but is not giving him an honorary degree because he has not yet proven himself in his role as President of the United States.

  4. plowshare Avatar
    plowshare

    Edward Peters, the canon lawyer you reference, Mary, did indeed do a good job of exposing the weakness of Jenkins’s argument, but I hope he amplifies it by addressing the claim that the document was “provisional”. About 5 years have passed since that provisional document was promulgated; hasn’t there been a permanent one to replace it yet?

    Jenkins’s hiding behind anonymous canon lawyers reminds me of a column by “Diogenes” on the last page of Catholic World Report a few years ago.
    It had to do with a bishop (or Cardinal) defending himself against charges that he was sheltering priests who were guilty of sex with minors. Always he hid behind the lawyers that he consulted. Does anyone remember which issue that appeared in?

  5. Lucky Mom of 7 Avatar
    Lucky Mom of 7

    It’d be an awful shame to have to boycott one’s own college graduation. That’s what I’d be planning to do if I was a soon-to-be ND grad.

    Lucky

Leave a Reply